메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
호서사학회 역사와 담론 湖西史學 第44輯
발행연도
2006.9
수록면
237 - 261 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of South Africa is well known as the model case in dealing with the past. TRC, based on the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act in 1995, was conceived as 'part of the bridge-building process designed to help lead the nation away from a deeply divided past to a future founded on the recognition of human rights and democracy(TRC Report Vol. 1)'. TRC had tried all the efforts to uncover the truth about past gross violations of human rights in the belief that this was necessary for reconciliation and national unity. However, the road to reconciliation and healing was neither smooth nor short.
I've researched the various ways of healing and reparations during and after TRC in South Africa society. There are three main categoriesreparations in money or other financial aids, psychological approaches to heal the suffered relationships among people and communities, and building or removing historical sites to make the past memorable. It is very meaningful and needed to adopt reparations in different levels even though the dead and the past cannot be returned. Any reparations without justice cannot heal the internal wound. I also emphasize that the perpetrators and the benefiters need to be educated and healed to live in a 'reconciled' new community.

목차

1. 아파르트헤이트 체제와 과거청산문제
2. 경제적 보상을 통한 치유
3. 피해자의 치유
4. 가해자의 치유
5. 상징적 보상을 통한 치유
6. 결론: 치유를 위한 사유
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017407460