메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 語文學 第93輯
발행연도
2006.9
수록면
499 - 530 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article is focusing media and novels in 1910’s through the code of ‘women in gender’. This is the preparation for the purpose of a study on the process of the formation about modern novel readers in 1910’s. Especially the subject of this study concentrate on an intellectual’s magazines and clarifying man’s attitude in their novels with an criterion of ‘women in gender’. And then it is come clear to bring undue pressure upon ‘women’, since ‘women in gender’ was under the nationalism dicourse. Moreover, a lack of ‘women in gender’ didn’t just remain in male writers in colonized Chosun. As it pulled ‘women movement’ out of the private, ‘women readers’ in 1910’s were the mainspring of activity in women movement in 1920’s.
The paper is founded on two basic ideas. One is the difference of modern media between magazines and newspapers. It is gaps that universality of newspaper and taste of magazine. Another is that ‘modern woman’ didn’t come to lignt suddenly in early 1920’s, but was previously shaped as a ground work of in colonized Chosun inside 1910’s. Both of all meet the issue of ‘readers’; specially related with ‘women readers’. Namely, Two basic ideas is connected from a angle of ‘women readers’ desire and ‘written readers’. First of all, it is made a inspection to the foundation of colonized Josun in 1910’s leading literatures in 1920’s.
Therefore this paper investigated『Hakjiguang』and『Chungchun』which were published by male intellectual in Chosun in 1910’s thoroughly with the code, “women in gender”. ‘Women’ in their literature, however, bended their knees to the name of ‘nation’. To crown it all, ‘women’ described by male writers were far from the real society Chosun those days. That’s why ‘male writers’ and 『Hakjiguang』and『Chungchun』didn’t accord with ‘imaginary readers’ and ‘written readers’. ‘Imaginary readers’ are the concept of composition by the publisher in media. ‘Written readers’ are the concept that a magazine or a newspaper recorded their media practically. ‘Imaginary readers’ were popular colonized people, but ‘written readers’ were male intellectuals in『Hakjiguang』 and『Chungchun』. On the contrary,『Maeilsinbo』which was the only newspaper in 1910’s was completely different. ‘Imaginary readers’ and ‘written reader’ were same. Accordingly『Maeilsinbo』wrote down real women’s life through ‘written readers’. The women movement in 1920’s was a cornerstone which is laid by the ‘women readers’ in 1910’s.

목차

1. 서론
2. 민족주의 담론의 이중성과 여성 계몽 담론
3. 관습과 민족에 갇혀있는 ‘여성’
4. 지식인 독자층의 강화와 타자화된 여성 독자
5. 결론
참고문헌
저자소개
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017363923