메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서양미술사학회 서양미술사학회논문집 서양미술사학회 논문집 제20집
발행연도
2003.12
수록면
7 - 20 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study is concerned with the practice and theory of colour in Italy at the critical point of time with emphasis on the beginning of ‘Alberti System’ ; the term referred to the colour modeling based on tonal emphasis in the exchange of chromatic beauty in Italian Renaissance.
Modern colour theory shows that all the colours have three categorical dimensions; 1) hue(色相), 2) saturation(彩度), and 3) value(明度). In the history of European painting, however, it is of great interest to observe that these three dimensions did not constitute the system of colour experience simultaneously; they were practiced with much various modes, depending on time and place. In Medieval paintings, for instance, it is difficult to separate the idea of value from the idea of hue. More precisely, it can be said that Medieval painters had only a tentative knowledge of value in the understanding of colours. Evidently, it is Quattrocento Italian painters who were for the first time aware of the importance of value in colour and made the intensive use of it in picture-making, conceiving colour as representing light as well as modeling. The preoccupation of colour as the representation of light, together with the analysis of space by the newly-developed rule of linear perspective, remained as the dominant tradition of European painting next coming five centuries.
In conclusion, I will propose that it was grey which did not only play an important role of the development of naturalistic paintings, but also gave them dignity in their looks, which might help to modernize the visual world of a city republic Florence, for instance­with growing interest in classical civic world.

목차

서론
1. 빛의 구현과 색채
2. 알베르티와 회색의 재발견
결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-017290068