지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The most fundamental difference between Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and formal linguistics is that, while the latter treats language as a composite of syntagmatically related elements, the former bases its linguistic analysis on paradigmatic aspects of language. In this paradigmatic view of SFL, its main focus is on accounting for relations that exist between content and expression, where expression is treated as an end result of myriads of content related choices provided by language.
A complete discussion of language and its use should deal not only with the way that class elements are used but with how language is the way it is and how its users understand it the way that they do. That is, studying language must involve multi functional aspects of language, because the nature of language at any given time is such that it always does more than one thing at a time.
Adopting the Prague School Linguists' tenets as the main source of language study, Halliday and the many other functionalism linguists have studied these multi functional aspects of language and defined lexico grammar as a meaning making process, and language as social semiotic. It is in understanding this meaning making process that we come to understand language as social semiotic.
In this paper, I give a brief overview of the basic three metafunctions of language as proposed by Halliday, and discuss the ways in which these metafunctions are played out in language and how this meaning making process is approached in Systemic Functional Linguistics.
A complete discussion of language and its use should deal not only with the way that class elements are used but with how language is the way it is and how its users understand it the way that they do. That is, studying language must involve multi functional aspects of language, because the nature of language at any given time is such that it always does more than one thing at a time.
Adopting the Prague School Linguists' tenets as the main source of language study, Halliday and the many other functionalism linguists have studied these multi functional aspects of language and defined lexico grammar as a meaning making process, and language as social semiotic. It is in understanding this meaning making process that we come to understand language as social semiotic.
In this paper, I give a brief overview of the basic three metafunctions of language as proposed by Halliday, and discuss the ways in which these metafunctions are played out in language and how this meaning making process is approached in Systemic Functional Linguistics.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
【참고문헌】
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
말을 두고 말해본다
중국조선어문
2017 .03
-
The Making of the Korean Language
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
광고 언어의 연구는 언어의 힘에 대한 연구이다
한국어학
2016 .11
-
국어교육에서의 언어정체성과 문법 교육의 역할
국어교육연구
2016 .06
-
Language Context and Language Experience : Adult Language Learners' Self-Concepts in Second Language Academic Context
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2007 .05
-
The Effects of Language Difference on L2 Learners’ Language Performance
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .12
-
어문운동의 교육적 함의와 실현 양상 연구
국어교육연구
2013 .08
-
고등학생들의 비규범적 통신 언어 사용과 국어 교육의 과제
어문연구
2006 .01
-
Development of Korean Language
Korea Journal
1963 .07
-
Language Policy and Language Education in North Korea
Korea Journal
1991 .03
-
언어와 비어(非語)
동서인문학
2008 .12
-
중국인 학습자의 한국어 억양 발달 과정에서 나타난 언어 보편성과 모국어 전이-억양의 문법적 기능을 중심으로-
이중언어학
2019 .01
-
Language Play and Language Learning in an Immersion Language Camp
응용언어학
2011 .09
-
Language Use and Development of a Bilingual Child Learning Two Languages Simultaneously
언어학 연구
2012 .07
-
언어 사용 원리에 입각한 한국어교육의 과제
언어학 연구
2011 .12
-
한국 국어 정책의 미래
어문학
2013 .12
-
세대간 소통을 위한 언어정책의 방향
국어국문학
2013 .08
-
표준어 선정 원칙에 대한 새로운 방향 모색
한국어학
2015 .05
-
근대계몽기 국문 담론 양상과 언문일치
어문연구
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-001-015589051