지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since 1920s Japanese Imperial Forces enforced the spiritual control on the Korean people through the popular cultural domination, enhancing the strategical interest on the traditional culture which underlay the Korean emotion and consciousness. Since the 1920s Japan conducted the survey and research on the condition of Korean society and culture in the view of colonial cultural strategy. Korean traditional culture was newly regarded as assimilative ideology to transform racial consciousness of the Korean public. That was not to abolish the traditional culture, but to use the national culture for spreading the colonial mind. To admit and emphasize the originality of Korean culture seemed to allow the racial independence of Koreans, but it could be dominative ideology when it transformed the contents of the originality. The form of 'respect for tradition' might justify the present on the basis of distorted past, enhancing the retrospective consciousness.
Japan invented and used the originality of the Korean traditional culture in two ways to spread 'assimilative ideology.' One is for assimilation in the view of Korean civilization, and the other is in the view of a hypothesis that Koreans and Japanese were from the same ancestor. Japan justified the civilized assimilation, focusing on the differentiation and inferiority of underdeveloped Korean culture compared to that of Japan. Japan also justified Korean colony, showing the similar cultural features of two countries. Such double aspects in treating Korean traditional culture was to show its cultural strategy of Japanese assimilative domination. 'Nae-Seon-Il-Che(內鮮一體)' and 'Whang-Min-Wha(皇民化)' are the slogans to emphasize the assimilation based on discrimination and at the same time to justify the discrimination. These slogans made the authority to consider assimilation natural. These two aspects were contradictory in some points, but they had the same goal to justify Japan's domination over Korean colony and establish the ideology of transforming Koreans to subjects of Japan. Japan used Korean culture as the way of enforcing Japanese national ideology, powering the cultural dominance over Korean public.
So Korean traditional culture was robbed of its original feature as 'national culture' and became 'colonial culture' in the 'false tradition' distorted by Japan's manipulative hands. In the history of modern and contemporary changes of Korea, the national and cultural consciousness which should have preserved in the traditional culture was transformed and deteriorated in the colonial cultural system.
Japan invented and used the originality of the Korean traditional culture in two ways to spread 'assimilative ideology.' One is for assimilation in the view of Korean civilization, and the other is in the view of a hypothesis that Koreans and Japanese were from the same ancestor. Japan justified the civilized assimilation, focusing on the differentiation and inferiority of underdeveloped Korean culture compared to that of Japan. Japan also justified Korean colony, showing the similar cultural features of two countries. Such double aspects in treating Korean traditional culture was to show its cultural strategy of Japanese assimilative domination. 'Nae-Seon-Il-Che(內鮮一體)' and 'Whang-Min-Wha(皇民化)' are the slogans to emphasize the assimilation based on discrimination and at the same time to justify the discrimination. These slogans made the authority to consider assimilation natural. These two aspects were contradictory in some points, but they had the same goal to justify Japan's domination over Korean colony and establish the ideology of transforming Koreans to subjects of Japan. Japan used Korean culture as the way of enforcing Japanese national ideology, powering the cultural dominance over Korean public.
So Korean traditional culture was robbed of its original feature as 'national culture' and became 'colonial culture' in the 'false tradition' distorted by Japan's manipulative hands. In the history of modern and contemporary changes of Korea, the national and cultural consciousness which should have preserved in the traditional culture was transformed and deteriorated in the colonial cultural system.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 1920년대 이후 文化政策의 轉換
3. 朝鮮文化 活用政策의 展開와 性格
4. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .03
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .04
-
Characteristics of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1963 .06
-
The Japanese View of Korean People and Culture
Korea Journal
1998 .09
-
우리나라 전통 문화 정책의 전개 과정과 그 의미
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .12
-
Korean Studies in Japan
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
다문화담론과 로컬리티의 이원성
로컬리티 인문학
2010 .04
-
조지훈의 민족문화 인식 방법과 그 내용
한국시학연구
2008 .12
-
Impact of Ancient Korean Culture upon Japan
Korea Journal
1972 .06
-
한국어능력시험에서의 한국 문화 내용 - 제11회부터 제21회를 중심으로 -
언어사실과 관점
2012 .01
-
해외 거주 한국어 초급 학습자 대상 한국 문화 교육 방안 연구
이중언어학
2014 .01
-
韓流以降の韓国社会における日本大衆文化の受容
일본문화연구
2014 .10
-
Japan"s Hidden History: Korean Impact on Japanese Culture
Korea Journal
1985 .03
-
한국 문화 교사 교육과정 개발을 위한 기초 연구
이중언어학
2013 .01
-
What Is Korean Culture Anyway? : A Critical Review
Korea Journal
2003 .03
-
Korean Studies Research in Japan
Korea Journal
1992 .06
-
개화기(1876~1910) 한국인의 일본관
사학연구
2004 .12
-
1990년대 한국 대중문화 담론 속의 ‘일본’ : 긍정적 일본 이미지의 형성 구조
일본연구
2014 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
근대 산업화 유적에 대한 한·일의 관점 비교 : 영도 조선소거리와 치쿠호오 탄전지대를 중심으로
김정하
비교민속학
2016
.12
전후 한국에서의 국가신도(國家神道) 시설의 변용 : 국내에 건립된 신사와 신사터를 중심으로
지영임
일어일문학
2016
.02
개항지 도시민속의 식민주의에 대한 비판적 고찰
김정하
동북아 문화연구
2013
.12
近代期 釜山 主要建築物의 立地 및 計劃的 特性에 관한 硏究
김영분
,
김기수
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2013
.03
호사카 유우지(保阪佑二)지음 『일본에게 절대 당하지 마라』 : 도서출판 답게, 2002년
오바타 미치히로
한일관계사연구
2002
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015490099