메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제15권 제3호
발행연도
2002.12
수록면
103 - 126 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The two main actions in Ashes to Ashes are evolved from the stories told by the two main characters, Rebecca and Devlin. The first action is the power game between the two characters, and the second is the awakening process of Rebecca and the audience, that human history which mainly consists of violence and oppression is the result of human agency. These two actions are mutually involved and struggle with each other to be dominant in the play. The agent of these two actions is storytelling. The aim of this paper is to study the functions of stories told by the characters.
This paper assumes that the stories told by the two characters are used as weapons when they struggle against each other to be dominant while they allow characters as well as the audience to reveal deep and difficult thoughts and feelings. Furthermore, a series of stories told by the female character makes herself as well as the audience not only gain power not to be controlled by power-oriented fascists, but also to have a social and shared responsibility for political violence and oppression that has been committed throughout history.
In the beginning of the play, the female character Rebecca presents “an ego ideal” in private as well as in public through storytelling to her partner Devlin. She deliberately tells stories concerning her former lover to use them as a means to confess herself that she is and was involved in violence such as the Holocaust where such people as her former lover as well as her present partner committed atrocities. What is ironical is that Devlin shows desire to know all about Rebecca’s former lover. That desire comes out of his wish to become like her former lover in his relation with Rebecca. Thus, the stories have different effects on the narrator Rebecca and the listener Devlin. Rebecca fights not to be manipulated by such power-oriented people while Devlin struggles to have the same position as Rebecca’s former lover.
As the play develops, Rebecca’s stories are no longer used as weapons for the power games but transforms her and the audience to face what could happen when they let the fascist-oriented people do what they want to do and to acknowledge their social and shared sense of responsibility for atrocities committed through history. The more Rebecca’s storytelling gains power and the more the audience becomes involved in Rebecca’s story, the less influencial Devlin’s voice becomes.
What is interesting in this play is the final part. Pinter returns the play to the starting point by making Rebecca deny her final confession “I gave him the bundle.” By doing this, Pinter reveals himself to live in a postmodern world where anything cannnot be said definitely.

목차






인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-842-015466010