메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제16권 제2호
발행연도
2003.8
수록면
45 - 70 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Joe Orton's What the Butler Saw is labelled as a subversive farce which challenges the generally accepted conventions and ideas of a society. It, however, never rejects the tradition of western comedy. Rather it actively uses the western comedy's common themes and structures. This paper pursues how Orton uses and subverts both the tradition of literature and the traditional ideas of his society in the play. For instance, The Butler deals with 'a search for identity' and 'a search for family and reunion,' which have been found in western comedy since Plautus. In the play, however, multiple losses of identities are observed but not the searches. Geraldine Barclay after struggling with forced, multiple identities, recovers her own identity and reunites with her lost parents and her twin brother. Here, the reunion with real identity and family is achieved by accident and with the help of Prentice's whimsical confession. The structure of 'search' remains, but without the contents. In this play, identity changes, especially sexual identity, but the traditional idea that identity is immovable is not challenged. All the characters, in spite of frequent and confusing costume changes, keep their own ideas of selfhood.
In this play, Geraldine is continuously abused by powerful men such as Prentice and Rance. She is certified many times and eventually strapped in a strait jacket. The abuses of the underdogs such as Geraldine and Nick are persistent and women's subjection to men is permanent. So whether this play challenges patriarchy is questionable. Rather, this play strengthens, in many ways, the patriarchal and authoritative social structures. In the end of the play, Sergeant Match recovers the cigar(a symbol of penis) of Churchill's statue, which he has been looking for. As family is reunited, Churchill's statue becomes a whole body. In this chaotic play, the only thing it matters to find seems to be neither one's identity nor family but Churchill's penis in both literal and symbolic ways. This play does not subvert but repeats what a patriarchal society has endorsed.

목차

1. 들어가기
2. 가족과 나
3. 나가면서

인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-842-015464965