지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the rapid expansion of business activities and the scope of commercial transactions, it is common to see a wide use of bills and checks as means of a payment in modern society. A forged signature on an instrument does not impose any liability on the person whose signature was forged. However, if he consents to be bound by the forged signature or represents that it is his own, he is liable as if he had signed the instrument himself. With the modern expansion of the use of checks and bills, individuals' credit limits are becoming exceedingly great.
Forgery is the creation of a false written document or the alteration of a genuine one, with the intent to defraud.
The Bills Act inadequately deals with the problem of forgeries of bills because it has only a single article covering the validity of obligations.
New payment systems such as Credit cards and Electronic fund transfers system have been widely used, but Bills have their own sphere. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze and examine the theories and cases regarding the liability of the forgee and forger of bills, and to propose guidance for legislative and constructive solutions regarding the forgery of bills. Due to the negotiability of a forged bill, there arises a dispute between the holder in due course of bill and a principal, regarding who is liable.
When a signature is forged or made without the authority of the person whose signature it purports to be, it is wholly inoperative, and there is no right to retain the instrument. In this paper, I have explained the liability of a principal i.e. the one whose name is signed, law should protect the holder in due course.
If anyones name is forged, he is liable to no one in principle. If he confirms the forgery, he is responsible for the forgery under the Korean Civil Code article 756 or article 126 and he is liable. The purpose of this thesis is to research the liability of forged bills.
Forgery is the creation of a false written document or the alteration of a genuine one, with the intent to defraud.
The Bills Act inadequately deals with the problem of forgeries of bills because it has only a single article covering the validity of obligations.
New payment systems such as Credit cards and Electronic fund transfers system have been widely used, but Bills have their own sphere. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze and examine the theories and cases regarding the liability of the forgee and forger of bills, and to propose guidance for legislative and constructive solutions regarding the forgery of bills. Due to the negotiability of a forged bill, there arises a dispute between the holder in due course of bill and a principal, regarding who is liable.
When a signature is forged or made without the authority of the person whose signature it purports to be, it is wholly inoperative, and there is no right to retain the instrument. In this paper, I have explained the liability of a principal i.e. the one whose name is signed, law should protect the holder in due course.
If anyones name is forged, he is liable to no one in principle. If he confirms the forgery, he is responsible for the forgery under the Korean Civil Code article 756 or article 126 and he is liable. The purpose of this thesis is to research the liability of forged bills.
목차
Ⅰ 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 추인(Genehmigung)에 의한 책임
Ⅲ. 피위조자의 귀책사유로 인한 표현책임
Ⅳ. 사용자책임
Ⅴ. 신의칙에 의한 책임
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
被用者의 어음僞造와 使用者責任
기업과혁신연구
1990 .01
-
한ㆍ중 전자서명제도에 관한 비교 연구
통상정보연구
2009 .12
-
본인서명사실 확인 등의 제도에 관한 소고
과학기술법연구
2012 .01
-
국내ㆍ외 전자서명과 인증에 관한 연구 : 한국ㆍ미국ㆍ일본ㆍEU 중심으로
문화산업연구
2003 .12
-
전자 서명 법제 개선 방향 : 전자 서명 정의, 법적 효력 및 공인 인증 제도의 문제점
비교사법
2017 .11
-
중국 불법행위의 책임귀속원칙에 관한 연구－불법행위책임법(2009년)의 내용을 중심으로－
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
전자저명에 관한 법적 고찰
중앙법학
2004 .10
-
컴퓨터 소프트웨어의 오류와 민사책임
기업법연구
2006 .03
-
중국 불법행위법의 최근동향에 관한 연구 : 불법행위책임법(2009년)의 구성과 주요내용을 중심으로
비교사법
2010 .06
-
국세기본법상 과점주주의 제2차 납세의무에 관한 고찰
법학논집
2002 .01
-
理事의 제3자에 대한 責任에 관한 硏究
법학연구
1994 .12
-
어음의 僞造와 僞造어음 支給의 效果
기업과혁신연구
1983 .02
-
어음의 僞造와 僞造어음 支給의 效果에 관한 一考
법학연구
1981 .12
-
가맹업자의 제3자에 대한 대위책임
경영법률
2011 .01
-
Waspaloy 터빈디스크의 열간 단조시 결정립분포 해석에 관한 연구
한국군사과학기술학회지
2006 .01
-
The Future of Post-Integrated Korea : Forging the Architecture of Regional Prosperity in East Asia
한반도선진화재단 기타 단행본
2010 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-017792572