메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이태숙 (단국대학교)
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 어문학 통권 제88호
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
381 - 399 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The attempt that determines the meaning of 'resistance' in the space of discourse don't use the text of literature as an implement in analyzing of society. The literary sociology in 80's is the method of analyze that emphasize an angle of the reflection theory in literary production. But the analysis of discourse in a literary text is a work of defining the sociality of language. Faucault gave his attentions to a distinctive feature of a literature that refined and excluded a special text as a literature or non-literature. He focused that system and structure in literary production. He thought the function of literature was a self-technique. In his point of view, the practical feature of literature that ignore a social standard and violate a social convention is the important factor that define a phase of an author. The attempt that analyze the literature of 'Kim Ji-ha' in the point of 'resistance' searches a special feature of 'resistance'. That attempt searches the relationship between Power and literature.
The discourse of modernization and ideology is a representation in the literature in 70's and the way of existence in the literature of 'Kim Ji-ha'. His theory of popular literature presented a direction of popular literature in 80's. But that presentation preserved a concept of people that based on reality in 70's. not a concept of people in the development of Marxist history. His literature deposits on a past and his ‘resistance’ cover the future with present. In that way, his literature explains the existence of literature. In the space of discourse, analyzing his phase of literature is very useful. Because it can overcome the breaking theory of connections in 80's and explains his literature in a absolute paradigm.

목차

1. 머리말

2. 근대화 담론과 대항 담론

3. 민중문학의 형식과 논리

4. 맺는말

참고문헌

저자소개

Abstract

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017799581