개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2002.12
- 수록면
- 65 - 90 (26page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Despite the importance and necessity, the 3PL has not been activated to date. Among many views, customers claim that logistics service provider(LSP) are not prepared or capable of offering satisfactory 3PL services, while LSP emphasize the lack of mutual trust, closed corporate culture of the customer and excessive demand for reducing the costs. With this keeping in mind, it surveyed difference of perception between users and providers of 3PL services in terms of the actual status of using 3PL services, the degree of satisfaction and key factors for selecting 3PL provider through the questionnaire.
As shown in this study, 43.3% of the respondents outsourced logistics services. However, Most company outsourced only inland transportation (49.5%) which is a simple and limited scope of 3PL services, but it also indicated that the percentage of users have ranged was less then 10% in outsourcing their whole logistics sector to 3PL provider and employing other logistics functions.
Among respondents, a majority of the service provider stated that they offered satisfactory cost-saving to the customers, while users felt that the degree of satisfaction for using 3PL services was evaluated as at an average level and they more highly regarded the strong partnership of their 3PL provider rather than the saving of cost and improvement of customer's services. Moreover, in contrast to the 3PL providers which regard the most important factor for selecting 3PL service provider is the logistics cost quoted, users of 3PL services felt that the quality of services was more significant than the reduction of cost, and this tendency for selecting 3PL providers was shown in more advanced countries. While users of 3PL services indicated that the main reason for not using 3PL services was to avoid disclosing information of their business and it costs much for employing 3PL providers than doing themselves, 3PL providers thought it was due to reluctancy of opening information and resistance from the logistics division engaged in logistics activities concerned.
Accordingly, providers and users of 3PL services should trust each other and prepare plan to activate 3PL services under the collaborative relationships as soon as possible.
As shown in this study, 43.3% of the respondents outsourced logistics services. However, Most company outsourced only inland transportation (49.5%) which is a simple and limited scope of 3PL services, but it also indicated that the percentage of users have ranged was less then 10% in outsourcing their whole logistics sector to 3PL provider and employing other logistics functions.
Among respondents, a majority of the service provider stated that they offered satisfactory cost-saving to the customers, while users felt that the degree of satisfaction for using 3PL services was evaluated as at an average level and they more highly regarded the strong partnership of their 3PL provider rather than the saving of cost and improvement of customer's services. Moreover, in contrast to the 3PL providers which regard the most important factor for selecting 3PL service provider is the logistics cost quoted, users of 3PL services felt that the quality of services was more significant than the reduction of cost, and this tendency for selecting 3PL providers was shown in more advanced countries. While users of 3PL services indicated that the main reason for not using 3PL services was to avoid disclosing information of their business and it costs much for employing 3PL providers than doing themselves, 3PL providers thought it was due to reluctancy of opening information and resistance from the logistics division engaged in logistics activities concerned.
Accordingly, providers and users of 3PL services should trust each other and prepare plan to activate 3PL services under the collaborative relationships as soon as possible.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국내 제3자물류의 현황
Ⅲ. 제3자물류에 대한 화주기업과 물류기업의 인식차이 분석
Ⅳ. 제3자물류의 활성화 방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Application of the AHP for Evaluating Third-Party Logistics Service Quality: Shipper's Perspective
한국항만경제학회지
2005 .09
-
국내 기업의 4PL 육성방안
해양정책연구
2001 .06
-
제조물책임(PL)이란 무엇인가?
식품공업
1998 .01
-
Effects of Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) on Growth and Yield of Oriental Melon (Cucumis melo L. var. makuwa Mak.)
HORTICULTURE ENVIRONMENT and BIOTECHNOLOGY
2007 .04
-
Business and Logistics Strategies of Global Logistics Firms Responding to the Changing Logistics Environment in China
한국항만경제학회지
2005 .09
-
농업인의 PLS 인식도 조사분석
한국농약과학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2019 .10
-
미국 제조업체의 3PL 이용에 관한 연구
월간 해양수산
2001 .09
-
미국 3PL 제공업체의 동향
월간 해양수산
2001 .10
-
PL법과 HACCP
육가공
2002 .01
-
소비자와 식품산업 -PL법을 중심으로-
식품공업
2001 .01
-
기업의 제조물책임(PL) 대응방안
식품공업
2002 .01
-
생산수명(Productive Life, PL)형질에 대한 이해
종축개량
2007 .01
-
[PL-6] Health/Functional Food and the Concept of Risk Analysis
한국식품영양과학회 학술대회발표집
2005 .10
-
국내 물류기업(3PL)의 중국 물류시장 진출 방안
해양정책연구
2003 .12
-
제조물책임법(PL법)이란?
물만 먹고 자라요
2002 .01
-
국내외에서의 PL법 판례동향
한국축산식품학회 학술발표초록집
2002 .01
-
대구 · 경북지역 기업의 물류특성 분석
한국항만경제학회지
2011 .06
-
PL법 시행 1년, 현주소를 파악한다.
사료산업
2003 .01
-
PL법의 해석과 법적측면에서의 업계대응
한국축산식품학회 학술발표초록집
2002 .01
-
Current status and prospects of Positive List System (PLS) of Japan
한국농약과학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2018 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
An Empirical Study of Customer Satisfaction in Chinese Third-Party Logistics Services (3PLS)
Liu Yu
,
Bae Jung Han
중국과 중국학
2011
.02
우리나라의 제3자 물류현황과 개선방향에 관한 연구
최관식
문화산업연구
2007
.06
국내 무역기업의 제3자 물류 활성화 방안
이신규
관세학회지
2005
.05
제3자물류 파트너십의 장기지속성에 관한 구조적 관계 연구
박이숙
,
소순후
산업경제연구
2012
.06
THE EVALUATION OF DECISION FACTORS IN LOGISTICS OUTSOURCING
Tseng-Cheng Lin
,
Wu-Yen Wen
,
Yu-Ling Ting
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2007
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-326-014541759