메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 대한건축학회논문집 - 계획계 제20권 제8호
발행연도
2004.8
수록면
114 - 121 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is prescribed in the provision of Article 2 of Architects Regulation that the definition of "Field Administration" is: to
supervise and affirm whether the building, architectural equipment, or structure is being constructed in accordance with
contract documents to guide and direct quality and progress of work, and its safety management. Since the "Provision of
Architects Regulation" was enacted in 1962, it has been compulsory to conduct field administration for any building of
certain size by a qualified licensed architect to affirm whether the building was constructed in accordance within the
legal parameters of the contract documents. However, the intention of the above legislation has become nominal since the
government mitigated provisions for duties and requirements of construction engineers, construction progress and safety
in October 1998. There have been constant disputes among many parties since the limitation of responsibility for field
administration was never clearly established legally even after the enactment of provisions on field administration.
The objective of this study is to build transparency in the construction process by clarifying the limit and extent of
field administration. I hope that this study can establish a basis to promote national competitiveness in the construction
industry.

목차

Abstract

1.서론

2.감리규정현황과 문제점

3.외국의 현황

4.현황분석 및 대안제시

5.결론

참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-014284911