지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is on the criterion of the subcategorization on some
conjunctive endings in contemporary Korean language. Especially this article focuses on the confrontation conjunctive endingsC -una, -jiman) and compromise conjunctive endings(-odo, -dorado, -uljirado) that are similar to each other in there meaning. It has been said that compromise conjunctive endings have the meaning of 'denial of expectation'. It as also said that the meaning of 'denial of expectation' is the meaning of pragmatic confrontation conjunctive endings as well. This is repetitive description. Except for the 'denial of expectation', the only distinct criterion of sub
categorization on the compromise endings is that they can be used in the situation of an assumption. But this meaning of 'certainty' is the aspectual meaning which cannot be the criterion of subcategorization on conjunctive endings. In the subcategorization of some conjunctive endings, the only useful criterion could be the meanings based on the relation of two conjuncts. To clear up this obscure situation, I propose to put the meaning category of compromise to the subcategory of confrontation. Actually, an ending has the two meanings according to circumstances. For example, the confrontation ending '-una' can be interpreted as compromise in some cases. It is the same to he other con-frontation or compromise endings.
Their common property is 'contrast', which is slightly different from 'noninterference, nonrestraint, reverse' according to the magnitude of awareness on divergence between preceding and following sentences or the direction of the awareness or the place of it. In the common property of 'contrast', the endings can be interpreted in prepositional in the case that the contrast between preceding and following sentences is superficial or in implicational in the case that the contrastis originated from the implication, the 'denial of expectation'
conjunctive endings in contemporary Korean language. Especially this article focuses on the confrontation conjunctive endingsC -una, -jiman) and compromise conjunctive endings(-odo, -dorado, -uljirado) that are similar to each other in there meaning. It has been said that compromise conjunctive endings have the meaning of 'denial of expectation'. It as also said that the meaning of 'denial of expectation' is the meaning of pragmatic confrontation conjunctive endings as well. This is repetitive description. Except for the 'denial of expectation', the only distinct criterion of sub
categorization on the compromise endings is that they can be used in the situation of an assumption. But this meaning of 'certainty' is the aspectual meaning which cannot be the criterion of subcategorization on conjunctive endings. In the subcategorization of some conjunctive endings, the only useful criterion could be the meanings based on the relation of two conjuncts. To clear up this obscure situation, I propose to put the meaning category of compromise to the subcategory of confrontation. Actually, an ending has the two meanings according to circumstances. For example, the confrontation ending '-una' can be interpreted as compromise in some cases. It is the same to he other con-frontation or compromise endings.
Their common property is 'contrast', which is slightly different from 'noninterference, nonrestraint, reverse' according to the magnitude of awareness on divergence between preceding and following sentences or the direction of the awareness or the place of it. In the common property of 'contrast', the endings can be interpreted in prepositional in the case that the contrast between preceding and following sentences is superficial or in implicational in the case that the contrastis originated from the implication, the 'denial of expectation'
목차
1.서론
2.본론
3.결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 대학생들의 영어 동사 하위범주화 자질 습득 정도 및 양상에 대한 연구
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
-
접속조사의 분류와 목록
우리말글
2006 .08
-
상적 의미에 따른 연결어미의 결합 제약 연구: 메타언어를 활용한 연결어미 교육을 위하여
이중언어학
2009 .01
-
한국어 접속문의 구조
국어국문학
2004 .12
-
영어권 외국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 접속 조사 용법 연구
외국학연구
2014 .01
-
한국어 교육을 위한 준말 연결형식 연구 : 종결어미와 연결어미의 결합형을 대상으로
동악어문학
2014 .08
-
부사형 어미와 접속어미
한국어학
2002 .08
-
조사 통합형 접속어미의 특징
국제언어문학
2011 .10
-
한국어 연결어미 ‘-지만’의 특성과 기술 방안 : 한국어 교육에서의 활용을 위한 ‘시제’, ‘상’, ‘문법 제약’을 중심으로
인문과학연구
2013 .06
-
접속부사 ‘그리고’와 접속어미 ‘-고’의 의미 비교 연구
언어사실과 관점
2019 .01
-
접속문의 성립조건과 접속성의 정도에 대하여
언어
1994 .12
-
한국어 교재에서 제약 중심의 연결어미 기술의 방향과 그 교육에 대한 연구
언어학 연구
2014 .04
-
목적 범주의 의미기초와 중국어 목적 범주의 문법 표현 형식에 대하여
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
소설 텍스트의 중한 번역방법 연구 : ST의 ‘문화소’와 TT의 ‘접속 표지’를 중심으로
번역학연구
2018 .03
-
초등학생의 접속부사 사용 양상과 특성
한국어학
2015 .11
-
Prosodic Subcategorization of Suffixes and Stress Preservation Effects in Morphologically Complex English Words
영어학
2014 .12
-
한국어 연결어미와 중국어 관련사에 대한 분류
이중언어학
2016 .01
-
A Corpus-based Study of Complex Conjunctive Adverbials
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2018 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014054012