메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와현실 제51권
발행연도
2004.3
수록면
255 - 282 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Korean economy faced a serious inflation as the Korean War destroyed production facilities and the cost of it surged up. Thus, Rhee Syngman elected Paik Tu Chin as the Minister of Finance and ordered him to counter the inflation,
Paiks financial stabilization policy [Paik-Chae-JeongJ was an ultra-retrenchment policy which was aimed to absorb the currency. Since the U,S. demanded economic stability of Korea as the precondition of providing economic aid.
By the execution of Paiks economic policy, which pushed the financial management by the criteria of Expenditure within Revenue, the Land Income Tax, the disposal of Vested Property and tax increase by selling foreign aid goods by market price. However, this policy required a huge amount of sacrifice from the people.
Paik Tu Chin executed the stabilization policy fulfilling the demand of the U.S., and asked for them to pay off the won advances to UN forces and to increase aids. The U.S. accepted these conditions and pursued an economic agreement by which they could control the Korean economy more directly.
By concluding the Meyer Agreement, the U.S. acquired the right to administer general Korean economic policy. It was the terminus where Paiks policy, which had premised to secure foreign aid, finally arrived.

목차

머리말

1. 전시인플레이션과 ‘백재정‘의 등장

2. ‘백재정‘의 담당자들

3. ‘백재정‘의 내용과 성격

4. 마이어협정과 ‘백재정‘의 귀결

맺음말

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-013793550