지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this thesis I suggest a hypothesis on early modem korean novel. That hypothesis is there are dual modernity in the nation falling into the colonial state at the door of modernizing. There are two different interpretive community on modernity in that society. The one is continuity, the other is interruption. As is generally known, the former is embodied in the theory of transplant.
The transplant theory of modem culture raised by Lim, wha is a dominant paradigm based on the evolution theory or the literary universality. It emphases the creativity of the writer. The writership is newly fanned by the students who study aboard like Lee, Kwang-su. They also emphasis the creativity of the production of literary work. They think that their writing has to form out of nothing.
But this attitude is very dangerous because in the concept of literary universality there are imperialistic orders in the form of aesthetics. The other side, it is dangerous to us only differences and specialities of our literary history are subjectively and mythically emphasize. The real values of 'Sinsosul' are just here.
In some aspects, 'Sinsosul' is represented as a true picture of the modernity of that society. 'Sinsosul' is more meaningful than a transitional form from ancient narratives to modem novel. Until now the study of 'Sinsosul' Limited to a few writers, especially Lee, In-jik, are problematic.
The major part of 'Sinsosul' is not the writership but the readership. It is also gradually changing into a new literary environment, but it acts only on already existing facts.
There are the reasons why many of the 'Sinsosul' are published and having read together with modem novel. The real end of 'Sinsosul' is not coming with the birth of modem literature, but with the replace of the old-reader to the new reader at the middle of 1920. Someone accepted this as very venturous one without actual proofs, but this already arouses enough sympathy from many other researcher of modem literature.
The transplant theory of modem culture raised by Lim, wha is a dominant paradigm based on the evolution theory or the literary universality. It emphases the creativity of the writer. The writership is newly fanned by the students who study aboard like Lee, Kwang-su. They also emphasis the creativity of the production of literary work. They think that their writing has to form out of nothing.
But this attitude is very dangerous because in the concept of literary universality there are imperialistic orders in the form of aesthetics. The other side, it is dangerous to us only differences and specialities of our literary history are subjectively and mythically emphasize. The real values of 'Sinsosul' are just here.
In some aspects, 'Sinsosul' is represented as a true picture of the modernity of that society. 'Sinsosul' is more meaningful than a transitional form from ancient narratives to modem novel. Until now the study of 'Sinsosul' Limited to a few writers, especially Lee, In-jik, are problematic.
The major part of 'Sinsosul' is not the writership but the readership. It is also gradually changing into a new literary environment, but it acts only on already existing facts.
There are the reasons why many of the 'Sinsosul' are published and having read together with modem novel. The real end of 'Sinsosul' is not coming with the birth of modem literature, but with the replace of the old-reader to the new reader at the middle of 1920. Someone accepted this as very venturous one without actual proofs, but this already arouses enough sympathy from many other researcher of modem literature.
목차
1. 서사(書肆)의 풍경과 식민지 근대의 이중성
2. ‘연속‘과 ‘단절‘의 해석공동체 : 신소설과 근대소설의 경계
3. 신소설이 끝나는 곳 : 소설「박명한 미인」의 문학사적 의미
4. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1930년대 작가적 자기 인식과 그 문학적 생산력에 관한 고찰
한국현대문학연구
1999 .12
-
미국 〈독자〉의 중국현대문학 〈읽기〉: 문학원론적 고찰
외국문학연구
2000 .12
-
Rethinking Korean Literary Modernity
Korea Journal
1995 .12
-
[특집/한국근대문학사 연구의 반성과 전망] 중심을 향한 동경 - 한국근대문학연구의 정치적 무의식
한국근대문학연구
2000 .04
-
김규동 초기시의 특성과 그 의미
비평문학
2018 .06
-
설창수론 : ‘전인(全人)’의 문학과 의지의 언어
우리문학연구
2016 .07
-
근대계몽기 『경향신문』소재 "쇼셜"의 특성 연구
현대소설연구
2004 .12
-
[특집/한국근대문학연구 비판] 한국근대문학사론과 근대성의 담론들 - 1930년대 후반 비평사 연구를 중심으로
한국근대문학연구
2001 .04
-
문학적 가치 판단의 객관성 문제
새한영어영문학
2003 .11
-
사회제도 속의 문학생태계와 문학교육의 과제
문학교육학
2013 .01
-
[특집/한국근대문학사 연구의 반성과 전망] 지워진 여성, 반쪽의 문학사 - 근대문학연구에 나타난 '여성'의 부재
한국근대문학연구
2000 .04
-
《가톨릭 靑年》의 문학 의식과 문학사적 가치 연구 : 1933년 6월 창간호부터 1936년 12월 폐간호를 중심으로
교회사연구
2006 .12
-
한국 근대성의 정당성 위기
동양철학연구
2009 .01
-
근대초기영어와 현대영어에서의 시간에 대한 개념적 은유
새한영어영문학
2008 .11
-
근대성 비판으로서의 "형식" : 김남천의 경우
현대소설연구
2001 .12
-
陶南 국문학사의 근대문학 서술과 근대인식
고전문학연구
2005 .01
-
신소설에 나타난 통속성의 전개 양상 : 〈귀의성〉에서 〈장한몽〉까지
국어국문학
2006 .12
-
근대성 논의에서 패러다임과 방법론의 혁신 문제 : 식민지근대화론과 내재적 근대화론을 넘어 差異와 異種의 근대성으로
국어국문학
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-013765507