지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Korea, study on product liability has been conducted for a long time, at last the Product Liability Act was established last December 1999 by the influence of many legislation of the world, and it is planned to be enforced from July 2002. Todays, the problem of product liability has been one of serious social problems in the world. In the modem society, the deep concern has been focussed on the legal liability against damages arised from defective products. However, as a large number of consumers' damages brought by defective products are the result of unequal transaction between two parties, the manufacturers that dominate the market through sales network and the consumers who have lost their right to be forced by products just relying on the seller.
Therefore, how will solve this problem as sort from defect. Generally speaking, The terms of defect in product liability means unsuitable condition regarding products safety. It is the most important thing at present for product liability to discuss defect. There are three kinds of defect in large.
It contains a manufacturing defect, defect of design, and defect of warnings. A manufacturing defect applys to no-fault liability, but a design and warning defect apply to fault liability. The Product Liability Act defines classified defects, but the statutory provision on the judgement standards of each type of defect is lacking. Manufacturing defect is relatively definite, so it does not cause any problem, but in judging design defect and warning defect, any judgement standards should beset up by risk utility test and consumer expectation test from the viewpoint of reasonable person's behavior. The concept of categorized defects by American Case and the type of three defects in our Product Liability Act are similar, so they will be useful data to us who have no accumulated data for this judgement standards. The judgement standards of defect is compelled to have limit in its statutory provision, so case collection and research have to be continued.
Therefore, how will solve this problem as sort from defect. Generally speaking, The terms of defect in product liability means unsuitable condition regarding products safety. It is the most important thing at present for product liability to discuss defect. There are three kinds of defect in large.
It contains a manufacturing defect, defect of design, and defect of warnings. A manufacturing defect applys to no-fault liability, but a design and warning defect apply to fault liability. The Product Liability Act defines classified defects, but the statutory provision on the judgement standards of each type of defect is lacking. Manufacturing defect is relatively definite, so it does not cause any problem, but in judging design defect and warning defect, any judgement standards should beset up by risk utility test and consumer expectation test from the viewpoint of reasonable person's behavior. The concept of categorized defects by American Case and the type of three defects in our Product Liability Act are similar, so they will be useful data to us who have no accumulated data for this judgement standards. The judgement standards of defect is compelled to have limit in its statutory provision, so case collection and research have to be continued.
목차
I. 서설
II. 책임요건으로서의 결함
III. 결함과 유사개념
IV. 결함의 유형별 검토
V. 결함의 판단기준
VI. 끝맺음
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제조물 결함의 유형과 판단기준에 관한 고찰
원광법학
2009 .01
-
임베디드 소프트웨어의 결함과 제조물책임 적용에 관한 고찰
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
식품사고와 제조물책임
법과 정책연구
2007 .01
-
제조물 결함의 유형분석을 통한 제조물 책임 예방 활동의 전개 방법에 관한 연구
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2010 .06
-
독일의 제조물책임에 관한 법적 연구
한양법학
2014 .02
-
제조물책임법 입증책임에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2019 .12
-
중국의 제조물책임 관련법규에서의 제조물결함에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2007 .05
-
제조물책임법의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구
법학연구
2013 .09
-
제조물책임보험에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2004 .02
-
공동주택의 하자담보책임 : 판례를 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .04
-
製造物責任紛爭을 위한 ADR(재판외 분쟁처리)제도의 활성화 방안
法學論文集
2008 .01
-
[Poster SESSION 포스터 발표]제조물책임법 시행에 따른 중소기업 품질경영시스템에 관한 연구
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2001 .10
-
새로운 환경하의 제조물책임보험
재산법연구
2003 .01
-
제조물책임에서의 설계상 결함판단기준으로서의 제품분류책임
아주법학
2017 .01
-
자율주행자동차에 대한 제조물책임의 적용에 관한 연구
아주법학
2016 .01
-
미국법상 제조물책임의 입증책임에 관한 판례동향 분석
통상정보연구
2018 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-013557419