메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

이해인 (경북대학교, 경북대학교 산업대학원)

지도교수
최상헌
발행연도
2023
저작권
경북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수4

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Acoustic-induced vibration in piping system leads to premature wear and failure of
the system and equipments. If a vortex shedding frequency due to the dead-end pipe
branch is overlapped with a pipe natural frequency, the magnitude of the amplitude is
increased, allowing for a fatigue failure. This paper has investigated computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) based assessment to predict the vortex shedding frequencies of
the Main steam Atmosphere Dump Valve (MSADV) and the Main Steam Safety Valve (MSSV)
in the main steam line of nuclear power plants. The CFD-based evaluation method has
been validated by measuring the vibration of the branch pipe under the 100% power
operation of the nuclear power plant, as well as by reviewing the deviation from the
evaluation result. The major vibration frequencies were predicted to be 171.4 Hz and
185.7 Hz in the MSADV branch pipe and four MSSV branch pipes of the main steam piping
through CFD analysis. The major vibration frequencies from the vibration measurements
were found to be 172.8 Hz and 193.2 Hz, showing a difference of approximately 3.9%
between the CFD analysis and measurement results. It is concluded that the difference
between the design drawings and the actual installation, as well as differences in
vibration measurement location and method, may have caused the discrepancy.
Therefore, reducing the discrepancy between the modeled and actual installed pipe
shapes, and minimizing the difference between the monitoring location in the CFD
analysis and the actual measurement location, would lead to a decrease in the
discrepancy between the analysis and measurement results.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론 1
Ⅱ. CFD 해석 3
2.1 CFD 해석 절차 3
2.2 CFD 해석 모델 생성 4
2.3 격자 생성 5
2.4 CFD 경계조건 및 해석 7
2.5 CFD 해석 결과 10
Ⅲ. 실험 측정 18
3.1 측정 위치 선정 및 측정 18
3.2 측정 결과 18
3.3 측정 결과 분석 22
Ⅳ. CFD 해석 결과와 측정 결과 비교 24
4.1 CFD 해석 결과와 측정 결과 비교 24
4.2 CFD 해석 결과와 측정 결과 편차 발생 요인 분석 27
Ⅴ. 결론 28
참고문헌 29

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0