에너지효율기준이 에너지사용 기자재의 전생애비용과 판매량에 미치는 영향 :Effect of Energy Efficiency Standards on the Life Cycle Cost and Market Shares of Energy-use Equipment

박민구

추천

검색

자료유형: 학위논문

저자정보: 박민구 (울산대학교 )

지도교수: 오석영

발행연도: 2023

저작권: 울산대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수14

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

2023

에너지효율기준이 에너지사용 기자재의 전생애비용과 판매량에 미치는 영향

박민구 건설환경공학과 2023.01 학위논문

2021

비용-효율적인 에너지기자재의 효율기준 수립 제도화 방안 연구

박민구 , 박흥석 , 오석영 에너지기후변화학회지 2021.06 학술저널

이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

인류는 산업화 이후 지속적인 경제발전을 이루어 왔으나 화석연료 사용의 급격한 증가는 지구 에너지 자원 고갈 문제뿐 아니라 온실가스로 인한 기후변화라는 또 다른 문제를 유발하였다 이러한 배경에서 에너지 효율 향상은 에너지 사용 절감, 온실가스 감축 및 지속가능한 발전을 위한 비용 효과적인 수단으로 인식되고 있으며 최근 국제에너지기구에서는 에너지 효율 향상을 제 의 에너지원으로 분류하는 것은 이와 같은 맥락이라 할 수 있다 특히 에너지 사용 기자재의 경우 산업, 건물, 수송 등 많은 부문에서 기저 에너지 사용원으로 기자재의 에너지 효율 향상은 그 파급 효과가 매우 크다 할 수 있다.
미국의 경우 1977 년 캘리포니아 주정부에서 기자재별 에너지 효율 기준을 처음 도입하여 현재 미국 전역에서 시행하고 있으며 에너지 효율 제도를 통하여 에너지 효율 향상 및 에너지 절감 효과를 확인한 바 있다 이러한 정책적 효과로 인해 기자재 효율 제도는 많은 국가에서 에너지 효율 제도를 수립 운영 중에 있다.
본 연구는 미국과 유럽의 에너지 효율 기준 수립 사례에 대해 연구하고 국내의 에너지 기자재 효율관리 방법과 비교 분석을 통하여 국내에 적용 가능한 에너지 사용 기자재의 비용 효과적인 에너지 효율 기준(Energy Efficiency Standards) 수립 방법을 제시하였다 또한 도출된 에너지 효율 기준 수립 방법론을 활용하여 에너지 기자재의 효율수준과 시장분포 형태에 대해 분석하고 가전기기 중에서 에너지 사용이 많은 전기냉장고 전기냉방기 텔레비전수상기 및 형광램프에 대해 각 기자재별 효율관리기자재 운용규정 에 따라 측정한 시험 데이터를 활용하여 사례 분석을 시행하였다.
주요 가전기기의 사례 분석을 통해 기자재 전생애비용(Life Cycle Cost, LCC)과 시장 판매량 분포를 확인하고 최적 가용 기술(Best Available Technology, BAT)과 ''효율관리기자재 운용규정''의 에너지 효율 등급을 함께 분석하였다 이를 통해 에너지 효율 기준 방법론의 적용성에 대해 평가하고 시장 유형 분석 시나리오에 대입하여 해당 에너지기자재에 대해 에너지 효율 기준의 적절성과 소비자 소비 행태에 대해 모의 진단을 수행하였다.
에너지 기자재 중 최저소비효율기준(Minimum Energy Performance Standards, MEPS)에 미달하는 제품은 국내 생산,수입, 판매가 불가하기 때문에 시장에서 강력한 규제로 작동하고 있다 그러나 과도한 규제는 관련 산업을 위축시키는 결과를 초래하므로 타당하고 합리적인 규제의 적정점을 찾는 것이 중요하다 또한 전기냉장고, 텔레비전수상기, 조명기기 등은 일반적으로 널리 보급되어 매일 사용되는 에너지 기자재로 이러한 기자재의 효율 관리를 통해 국가 에너지 사용량 절감을 유도하고 온실가스 감축이라는 시대적 과제 해결에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Since industrialization began, the rapid increase in fossil fuel usage has caused not only the depletion of global energy resources but also climate change due to greenhouse gases. Accordingly, energy efficiency improvement has been recognized as a cost-effective means for energy saving, greenhouse gas reduction, and
sustainable development. For this reason, International Energy Agency classified energy efficiency improvement as the first energy source. In particular, since energy-use equipment is a basic energy source in many sectors, such as industry, buildings, and transportation, improvement in the energy efficiency of energy-use equipment has a huge ripple effect.
In the United States, the energy efficiency standard for equipment was first introduced by the California state government in 1977 and is currently being enforced throughout the United States. It is confirmed that the implementation of the energy efficiency policy is effective for both energy efficiency improvement and energy saving. Due to the policy effects, energy efficiency standards is being established and operated in many countries.
The purpose of this study is to propose a method for establishing cost-effective energy efficiency standards for energy-use equipment. To find out an applicable method in Korea, we studied the cases of establishing energy efficiency standards in the US and Europe and conducted a comparative analysis of domestic energy
equipment efficiency management methods. In addition, with the use of the derived energy efficiency standard establishment methodology, we analyzed the level of efficiency and market shares of the major home appliances such as electric refrigerators, electric air conditioners, television receivers, and fluorescent
lamps that use a lot of energy and presented case analysis by using test data measured according to the ''Efficiency Management Equipment Operation Regulations'' for each equipment.
Through case analysis of major home appliances, we reviewed life cycle cost (LCC) and market shares and analyzed the best available technology (BAT) and the Energy Efficiency Grade of the ‘Efficiency Management Equipment Operation Regulations’.
Based on this, we evaluated the applicability of the energy efficiency standard methodology and performed a simulated diagnosis on the appropriateness of the energy efficiency standard and consumer consumption behavior for the corresponding energy equipment by substituting it into the market type analysis scenario.
Since energy-use equipment that does not meet the minimum energy performance standard (MEPS) cannot be produced, imported, or sold in Korea, energy efficiency standards are worked as strong regulations in the market. Therefore, it is important to find the optimal point of reasonable regulation, as excessive regulation results in shrinking related industries.
In addition, since electric refrigerators, television receivers, and lighting devices are generally widely distributed and used every day, energy efficiency management of these types of equipment can lead to national energy consumption reduction and contribute to solving the era''s challenges of reducing greenhouse
gas emissions.

#에너지사용 기자재 #효율 #효율기준 수립 #효율관리기자재 #전생애비용 #효율 등급

제 1 장 서 론 ······························································································· 1
1.1 연구 배경 및 목적 ················································································ 1
1.2 연구 내용 ································································································ 4
제 2 장 에너지 기자재 효율 기준 및 국외 사례 연구 ····················· 6
2.1 에너지 기자재 효율 기준 개념 ·························································· 6
2.2 국외 에너지 관련 기자재 효율 기준 수립 사례 연구 ············· 14
2.2.1 문헌 연구 ······················································································ 14
2.2.2 미국의 에너지 기자재 효율 기준 수립 ·································· 17
2.2.3 유럽의 에너지 기자재 효율 기준 수립 ·································· 27
2.3 소결론 ··································································································· 36
제 3 장 국내 에너지 기자재 효율 기준 수립 ····································· 38
3.1 국내 에너지 관리 법제 배경 ··························································· 38
3.2 국내 에너지 기기자재의 에너지이용합리화 법제 분석 ············· 41
3.2.1 효율관리기자재의 에너지이용합리화법 체계 ························ 41
3.2.2 효율관리기자재의 에너지이용합리화 법제 분석 ·················· 42
3.3 소결론 ··································································································· 52
3.3.1 효율관리기자재 에너지이용합리화 법제 분석 소결론 ··········· 52
3.3.2 제언 ································································································ 52
제 4 장 비용 효과적인 에너지 효율 기준 수립 연구 ······················ 55
4.1 효율 기준 수립을 위한 기초 자료 조사 ······································· 55
4.2 효율 기순 수립 방법론 ··································································· 59
4.2.1 에너지 효율 지표(Energy Efficiency Index) 결정 ········· 59
4.2.2 경제성 분석(Economical Impact) 방법 ···························· 60
4.2.3 환경적 영향(Environmental Impact) 분석 ····························· 63
4.2.4 비용 효과적인 에너지 효율 기술 설정 방법 ······················ 66
4.3 소결론 ································································································· 69
제 5 장 에너지 효율 기준 시나리오 분석 ··········································· 70
5.1 에너지 효율 기준 시나리오 분석을 위한 가정 ··························· 70
5.2 유형별 시나리오 분석······································································· 73
5.2.1 Case 의 분포를 나타내는 경우 ······································ 73
5.2.2 Case 의 분포를 나타내는 경우 ······································ 84
5.2.3 Case 의 분포를 나타내는 경우······································ 98
5.2.4 Case 의 분포를 나타내는 경우 ···································· 102
5.3 소결론 ································································································· 104
제 6 장 Case : 사례 분석 상업용 전기냉장고 ······················ 108
6.1 서론 ····································································································· 108
6.2 연구 방법 ··························································································· 109
6.2.1 에너지 효율 지표(Energy Efficiency Index) ·················· 109
6.2.2 전생애비용(Life Cycle Cost) ················································ 110
6.3 상업용 전기냉장고의 에너지 효율 기준 적합성 분석 결과 ··· 113
6.3.1 에너지 효율 등급(Energy Efficiency Grade) 조사 ········ 113
6.3.2 에너지 효율 지표(Energy Efficiency Index) 분석 ········ 113
6.3.3 전생애비용(Life Cycle Cost) 분석 ······································ 114
6.4 소결론 ······························································································· 116
제 7 장 Case : 사례 분석 전기냉방기 ···································· 124
7.1 서론 ····································································································· 124
7.2 연구 방법 ··························································································· 125
7.2.1 에너지 효율 지표(Energy Efficiency Index) ·················· 125
7.2.2 전생배비용(Life Cycle Cost) ················································ 126
7.3 전기냉방기의 에너지 효율 기준 적합성 분석 결과················· 128
7.3.1 에너지 효율 등급(Energy Efficiency Grade)조사 ········ 128
7.3.2 에너지 효율 지표(Energy Efficiency Index)분석 ········ 128
7.3.3 전생애비용(Life Cycle Cost)분석 ······································ 129
7.4 소결론 ······························································································· 130
제 8 장 Case 사례 분석 : 텔레비전수상기 ····························· 138
8.1 서론 ····································································································· 138
8.2 연구 방법 ··························································································· 139
8.2.1 에너지 효율 지표(Energy Efficiency Index) ·················· 139
8.2.2 전생애비용(Life Cycle Cost) ················································ 139
8.3 텔레비전수상기의 에너지 효율 기준 적합성 분석 결과 ········· 142
8.3.1 에너지 효율 등급(Energy Efficiency Grade)조사 ········ 142
8.3.2 에너지 효율 지표(Energy Efficiency Index)분석 ········ 143
8.3.3 전생애비용(Life Cycle Cost)분석 ······································ 143
8.4 소결론 ······························································································· 144
제 9 장 Case 사례 분석 형광램프 ········································ 158
9.1 서론 ····································································································· 158
9.2 연구 방법··························································································· 159
9.2.1 에너지 효율 지표(Energy Efficiency Index) ·················· 159
9.2.2 전생애비용(Life Cycle Cost) ················································ 160
9.3 형광램프의 에너지 효율 기준 적합성 분석 결과····················· 162
9.3.1 최저소비효율기준 조사(MEPS) ············································· 162
9.3.2 에너지 효율 지표 분석(Energy Efficiency Index) ········ 162
9.3.3 전생애비용(Life Cycle Cost)분석 ······································ 163
9.4 소결론 ································································································· 164
제 10 장 민감도 사례 분석 ································································· 168
10.1 민감도 분석 인자 ·········································································· 168
10.2 구매비용(Purchase Cost) 민감도 분석 ································· 169
10.3 에너지 비용(Energy Cost) 민감도 분석 ······························· 171
10.4 제품수명(Lifetime) 민감도 분석·············································· 173
제 11 장 결 론 ························································································ 175
Reference ··································································································· 178
부 록 ··································································································· 186
영 문 요 약 ······························································································· 217

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

목차

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)