Domestic livestock manure production continues increasing to 139,753 ton/d as of 2020. Among them, cattle manure accounts 41.3% showing the largest amount of total livestock manure production. Approximately 94.9% of the generated cattle manure is treated as compost and sprayed on agricultural land, but compost spraying area will be limited due to the continuous decrease in agricultural land. In addition, environmental problems such as excessive nutrient supply of agricultural land, odor, and greenhouse gas emission are serious. Above-mentioned problems can be solved by switching treatment methods to anaerobic digestion, but the cattle manure includes some non-biodegradable substances such as lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose, resuling in low biodegradation and digestive efficiencies. Therefore, this study aimed to improve the anaerobic digestion efficiency of cattle manure by deriving optimal conditions for pretreatment, anaerobic co-digestion, and stable continuous operation. The central composite inscribed using Minitab''s response surface methodology was introduced to efficiently derive optimal pretreatment conditions. To select optimal conditions for thermal hydrolysis, microwave, and ultrasound pretreatments, BMP(Biochemical Methane Potential) test were applied with factor conditions derived by Mititab''s central composite inscribed, and then the results were compared. The optimal conditions for thermal hydrolysis pretreatment was deriven under 145.5 ℃ and 45 minutes showing biodegradability of 40.2%. Optimal conditions for the microwave and ultrasound pretreatments were deriven from the conditions of 818 W, 7.4 minutes and 471 W, 41.6 minutes, resulting in 38.9% and 39.2% of methane conversion efficiency, respectively. Methane conversion efficiency were improved when optimal conditions of each method were applied. Methane conversion efficiency were respectively 32%, 28%, and 29% higher in thermal hydrolysis, microwave, and ultrasound pretreatments than that in control. It is well known that the anaerobic digestion of cattle manure is not efficient due to its low C/N ratio and low biodegradability. To solve this problem, food waste(FW) and pig manure(PM) were mixed for anaerobic co-digestion, and the simplex lattice design was introduced to confirm optimal mixing ratio. As a result, anaerobic co-digestion of co-substrate combined with mixture ratio of 30.5:42.5:27.0 (CM:FM:PM) showed the highest performance. The synergy index analysis results showed that the synergistic effect was reinforced as the compositions of cattle and pig manures in co-substrate were increased. Continuous experiment for anaerobic digestion of optimally pretreated and mixed co-substrate was tested under OLR(Orgarnic loading rate) fluctuation condition. For the continuous tests, TCM(Treatment Cattle Manure)+FW+PM reactor was operated with co-substrate mixed at optimal mixture ratio (30.5:42.5:27.0). CM and TCM reactors were operated with single substrate of pretreated and non-pretreated cattle manures, respectively. All continuous reactors were operated under different OLR of which ranges were gradually changed from 1 kg-VS/m3·d (T1) to 7 kg-VS/m3·d (T4). As a result, the organic matter removal rate in CM reactor was decreased during the stage T2, and then pH drop and VFAs(Total Volatile Fatty Acids) accumulation in CM reactor were occurred when the OLR was further increased during the stage T3. For the TCM reactor, although the efficient organic matter removal was maintained during the stage T2, it could not avoid the pH drop and VFAs accumulation at stage T3. In contrast, the TCM+FW+PM reactor maintained efficient performances even OLR increased to 5 kg-VS/m3·d (stage T3), showing stable methane yield and organic matter removal efficiency. However, TCM+FW+PM could not overcome inhibition of pH drop and VFAs accumulation at the stage T4 of which OLR further increased showing drastic decrease in biogas production.
Ⅰ. 서 론 11. 연구 배경 및 목적 12. 연구범위 및 내용 4Ⅱ. 문헌 고찰 51. 축산환경 정책현황 52. 가축분뇨 관리현황 132.1 가축분뇨 발생현황 142.2 가축분뇨 처리현황 162.3 가축분뇨 특성 212.4 가축분뇨 처리방법 개선 243. 혐기성 소화 원리 273.1 가수분해 단계 293.2 산 생성 단계 303.3 메탄 생성 단계 324. 혐기성 소화 영향인자 334.1 pH 334.2 알칼리도 344.3 휘발성유기산(VFA) 364.4 온도 374.5 C/N비 394.6 암모니아 404.7 유기물 부하율(Orgarnic loading rate, OLR) 425. 혐기성 소화 효율 향상 방안 435.1 전처리 기술 455.1.1 열 가수분해 전처리 465.1.2 마이크로파 전처리 495.1.3 초음파 전처리 525.1.4 전처리 기술 비교 555.2 통합소화 56Ⅲ. 실험재료 및 방법 571. 실험재료 571.1 전처리 방법에 따른 우분의 소화효율 평가 성상 571.2 혼합비에 따른 통합소화 효율 평가 성상 582. 통계적 실험계획법 592.1 실험계획법 진행원리 및 절차 602.2 반응표면법 612.3 혼합물 실험설계 652.3.1 심플렉스 격자 설계(Simplex lattice design) 662.3.2 심플렉스 중심 설계(Simplex centroid design) 672.3.3 꼭지점 설계(Vertices design) 683. 분석 방법 693.1 원소분석 693.2 성상 분석 693.3 이론적 메탄수율(Theoretical methane yield) 693.4 누적 메탄수율(Cumulative methane yield, CMY) 703.5 메탄 전환 효율(Methane conversion efficiency, MCE) 703.6 BMP test 714. 실험 장비 734.1 열 가수분해 전처리 장비 734.2 마이크로파 전처리 장비 744.3 초음파 전처리 장비 754.4 회분식 반응조 76Ⅳ. 결과 및 고찰 781. 전처리 방법에 따른 우분의 소화효율 평가 781.1 실험설계 781.1.1 열 가수분해 781.1.2 마이크로파 791.1.3 초음파 801.2 누적 메탄수율 및 메탄 전환 효율 811.2.1 열 가수분해 811.2.2 마이크로파 851.2.3 초음파 891.3 Modified Gompertz 모델을 이용한 메탄 수율 특성 평가 931.3.1 열 가수분해 931.3.2 마이크로파 941.3.3 초음파 951.4 초기 모델 및 분산분석표 검토 961.4.1 열 가수분해 961.4.2 마이크로파 971.4.3 초음파 981.5 적합 모델 구축 및 최적 조건 도출 991.5.1 열 가수분해 991.5.2 마이크로파 1011.5.3 초음파 1031.6 재현성 검토 1051.7 전처리 방법 비교 1071.8 우분 열 가수분해에 따른 효과 분석 1081.8.1 온실가스 감축량 1081.8.2 경제적 효과 1121.9 결과요약 및 고찰 1142. 우분/돈분/음식물류폐기물 혼합비에 따른 통합소화 효율 평가 1162.1 실험설계 1162.2 누적 메탄수율 및 메탄 전환 효율 1172.3 Modified Gompertz 모델을 이용한 메탄 수율 특성 평가 1202.4 혼합비율에 따른 최적 혼합비 도출 1212.5 결과요약 및 고찰 1273. 유기물 부하에 따른 통합소화 효율 평가 1283.1 pH 및 Alkalinity 1283.2 TVFA(Total Volatile Fatty Acids) / Alkalinity Ratio 1313.3 유기물 제거량 1343.4 메탄 발생량 1363.5 결과요약 및 고찰 138Ⅴ. 종합결론 140참고문헌 142감사의 글 152