메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

박성일 (부산대학교, 부산대학교 대학원)

지도교수
정재준
발행연도
2022
저작권
부산대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수3

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
증기발생기 세관파단사고(SGTR, Steam Generator Tube Rupture)는 원자력발전소 설계
시 중요하게 고려되는 설계기준사고 중 하나이다. SGTR 사고가 발생하게 되면 파열된 증
기발생기 세관을 통해 1차측 냉각수(Reactor Coolant)가 2차측으로 누설된다. 사고 완화
를 위해 운전원은 비상운전 절차서에 따라 누설 차단을 위해 파열된 증기발생기를 격리
하고, 압력 평형이 될 때까지 1차측을 감압한다. 그 후 정지냉각계통을 사용할 수 있도록
냉각 및 감압 운전을 수행하게 된다. 이때, 격리된 증기발생기를 냉각하는 방법 중 하나
인 역유입에 의한 방법은 2차측 냉각수가 1차측으로 역유입되면서 냉각하는 방법으로, 붕소농도가 낮은 2차측 냉각수가 1차측으로 유입되기 때문에 붕소희석에 의한 재임계에
주의하여야 한다. 본 연구에서는 MARS Simulator를 활용하여 다양한 운전조건 하에서 역유입에 의한 냉
각을 수행하여 운전모드4까지 냉각하였을 때, 2차측 냉각수에 의한 1차측 붕소희석 영향
을 최적평가를 통해 평가해 보았다. 평가 결과, 붕소희석에 영향을 줄 수 있는 다양한 운전조건 하에서도 추가적인 반응도
사고(제어봉 인출 등)가 없다면 역유입을 이용한 운전모드4까지 냉각운전 수행 시 정지
여유도 제한조건을 만족할 수 있음을 확인하였다.

목차

1. 서 론
1.1 연구배경 ·················································································································· 1
1.2 연구목표 ······················································································································ 1
2. 최적평가 방법 및 초기조건 가정
2.1 시뮬레이션 방법 ········································································································ 3
2.2 초기조건 가정 ············································································································ 4
2.3 붕소희석 영향 인자 선정 ························································································ 5
2.4 운전원 조치사항 ········································································································ 6
2.5 정지여유도 평가 방법 ······························································································ 8
3. 증기발생기 세관파단사고 시뮬레이션 진행
3.1 증기발생기 세관파단사고 전개 ············································································ 10
3.2 주요 운전변수 변화 ································································································ 11
4. 붕소농도 변화 및 정지여유도 평가
4.1 주기 초 역유입 운전 시 붕소희석 평가 ···························································· 22
4.2 주기 말 역유입 운전 시 붕소희석 평가 ···························································· 26
4.3 붕소주입운전 영향 평가 ························································································ 31
4.4 냉각률에 의한 영향 평가 ······················································································ 34
4.5 낮은 냉각률에서 붕소주입운전 영향 평가 ························································ 41
5. 결 론 ··································································································································· 46
참고문헌 ····································································································································· 47
Abstract ····································································································································· 48

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0