메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김혜진 (공주대학교, 공주대학교 특수교육대학원)

지도교수
임경원
발행연도
2021
저작권
공주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수31

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to present specific educational cases in the school field based on the experience of teachers who participated in the 4th Industrial Revolution Research School and to present a direction to special teachers who want to try the 4th Industrial Revolution education. In fact, I would like to explore the meaning of how the 4th Industrial Revolution education is operated in special schools, what educational programs were used, problems and difficulties in the operation process, and what to keep in mind.
As for the research method, focus group interviews were mainly used as qualitative case study methods, and common questions and questions corresponding to each group were separately presented by selecting three groups. Participants in the study are 13 special teachers in the middle school course of a special school that operated the 4th Industrial Revolution education program based on the free school year system.
As a result of the study, 4 upper categories, 14 lower categories, and 41 semantic units were derived.
As a result of the first top category, problems and improvement measures were presented regarding five representative class cases: Ozobot, drone, smart farm, robot cleaner, and artificial intelligence speaker. Educational experiences on five class programs conducted by special schools were presented.
As a result of the second upper category, teachers emphasized the need to organize and operate a curriculum for special schools considering the conditions of students, parents, and schools while operating the 4th Industrial Revolution education program. In order to organize and operate the curriculum of special schools, the operation and achievement standards of the curriculum in various aspects such as learner diversity, teacher competency, and school characteristics must be different, and specific and systematic standards are needed.
As a result of the third upper category, special teachers at this special school participated in a number of professional learning communities and related training to enhance the education expertise of the 4th industrial revolution. As a result of participation, short-term one-time participation in training was difficult to lead to the enhancement of teacher expertise, and showed mental burden and regret in educational quality to apply to students. In order to enhance the professionalism of teachers related to the 4th Industrial Revolution, various professional opportunities such as expanding teacher training and operating a pilot school selection research group should be improved, and active support from the government and education offices is needed.
As a result of the fourth upper category, changes in future job groups and job losses in the changing era of the fourth industrial revolution are expected, and specific measures for future job jobs for disabled students should be sought. Most of the career vocational education for students with disabilities is still very biased toward simple assembly or service, and career education for the fourth industry is insufficient. Accordingly, it was required to provide administrative, financial, and institutional support such as exploring new occupational groups, establishing career and vocational education plans based on 4th industrial technology, and protecting job creation for the disabled.
Through these research results, it is intended to present the experience of special teachers who operated and guided educational programs related to the 4th Industrial Revolution in special schools. Various trials and errors have been experienced through practical educational cases in the educational field of special schools, and the current location and direction of special education related to the 4th industrial revolution can be improved.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론 1
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
2. 연구 질문 3
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 5
1. 연구의 동기 5
2. 일반교육에서의 4차 산업혁명 교육 6
1) 4차 산업혁명에 따른 교육과정의 변화 7
2) 4차 산업혁명 시대 교사의 역할과 역량 10
3. 특수교육에서의 4차 산업혁명 교육 12
1) 특수교육에서의 4차 산업혁명 교육 선행연구에 따른 현황 12
2) 4차 산업혁명 시대에서의 특수교육 교육과정 13
3) 4차 산업혁명 시대 특수교사의 역할과 역량 16
4) 특수교육에서의 미래 교육 가능성과 기대 17
5) 미래의 일자리와 진로직업교육 19
4. 질적 사례 연구 21
Ⅲ. 연구 방법 26
1. 질적 사례연구 26
2. 연구 참여자 27
3. 연구 일정 및 운영 과정 28
1) 선행연구 분석 30
2) 면담 질문지 개발 31
4. 자료 수집 34
1) 면담 35
2) 현지 문서자료 37
5. 자료 분석 37
6. 연구 윤리 및 진실성 38
Ⅳ. 연구 결과 및 논의 39
1. 4차 산업혁명 관련 교육프로그램과의 첫 만남 41
1) 작은 고추가 맵다, 오조봇 41
2) 조심조심 유리 공주, 드론 48
3) 아날로그 스마트팜 51
4) 우리 집 애완견 로봇청소기 54
5) 자주 꺼내 먹어요. 인공지능 스피커 57
6) 빠르게 적응하고 있는 학생들 63
2. 특수학교에서의 4차 산업혁명 관련 교육프로그램 시도, 그 뒷이야기 66
1) 프로그램 운영 과정에서 겪은 어려움 66
2) 교육과정과의 연결고리 탐색의 필요성 71
3) 직접 시도해보며 느낀 4차 산업혁명 관련 교육의 필요성 77
3. 4차 산업혁명 교육 연수와 전문적학습공동체의 필요성 80
1) 야! 너도 할 수 있어 : 스마트한 선생님 80
2) 단 한 번에 전문가 90
3) MZ세대 교사 살아남기 93
4. 4차 산업혁명 속 진로와 직업교육의 방향 95
1) 극한직업, 기계 속 일자리 찾기 95
2) 특수교육 미래 직업설계 97
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 103
참고문헌 108
ABSTRACT 113
부록 116

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0