메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

이하나 (평택대학교 )

지도교수
구자경
발행연도
2021
저작권
평택대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수13

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
본 연구는 병영생활전문상담관의 역할수행 경험 이야기를 탐구하는 것
을 목적으로 하였다. 연구퍼즐은 첫째, 연구참여자는 이전의 삶에서 어떠
한 역할수행을 하였으며, 병영생활전문상담관의 역할수행에 대하여 어떠한
기대가 있었는가, 둘째, 연구참여자는 병영생활전문상담관 역할수행 경험
에 대해 어떠한 이야기를 하며, 역할수행 경험의 의미를 어떻게 재구성하
는가이다.
본 연구를 위해 현재 병영생활전문상담관으로 재직기간이 5년 이상이
되어 무기계약으로 전환된 정수연(가명), 신아름(가명), 김보은(가명)을 연
구참여자로 선정하였다. 자료수집은 2020년 12월 21일부터 2021년 7월 6일
까지 면담 전 사전 설문과 3∼4회의 심층면담, 수차례의 전화통화, 이메일,
카카오톡 문자 등의 방법을 통해 이루어졌다. 연구참여자들의 병영생활전
문상담관의 역할수행 경험과 그 의미의 분석은 시간성, 사회성, 장소를 고
려한 3차원적 내러티브 탐구 공간에서 이루어졌다.
연구참여자들은 자신이 수행하게 될 병영생활전문상담관 역할에 대한
새로운 준비나 오리엔테이션 없이 전문상담자로서 성장하게 될 좋은 기회
라고 생각하며 병영생활전문상담관으로서의 직무를 시작하였다. 초기에 연
구참여자들은 현역복무 부적합 여부에 대해 지휘조언하는 역할을 마주하
고 역할 정체성의 혼란을 경험하였으나 점차적으로 전문상담자로서의 정
- iv -
체성을 유지하면서 동시에 부대 안정화와 전투력 향상이라는 특수한 환경
적 요구에 부응하며 군 조직에서의 시냅스 역할을 수행하고 있었다. 본 연
구자는 연구참여자들의 역할수행 경험의 의미를 <기대와 다른 역할에 대
한 당혹스러움>, <적절한 지휘조언을 통한 병력관리의 등대역할>, <장병
들의 정서적 안정을 돕는 5분 대기조>, <전문상담자와 군 조직의 시냅스
로서의 역할 정체성>, <역할수행에 대한 재인식 및 확장>으로 구성하였
다. 연구에 참여한 병영생활전문상담관들의 역할수행 경험 이야기가 병영
생활전문상담 제도의 효과적 운영에 기여할 수 있기를 바란다.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론 ······································································································· 1
1. 내러티브의 시작 : 연구자 내러티브··················································· 1
2. 연구의 필요성 및 목적······································································· 12
3. 연구 퍼즐····························································································· 18
Ⅱ. 선행 연구 고찰 ···················································································· 19
1. 역할 및 역할수행에 대한 이해·························································· 19
1) 역할과 역할기대, 역할수행의 개념················································ 19
2) 역할수행과 역할기대, 역할갈등과의 관계····································· 22
2. 병영생활전문상담관의 직무 및 역할················································· 24
1) 군상담의 포괄적 정의와 분류························································ 24
2) 병영생활전문상담관 직무와 역할수행··········································· 29
Ⅱ. 연구방법 및 절차 ················································································ 37
1. 내러티브 탐구····················································································· 37
2. 연구절차······························································································· 39
1) 연구참여자······················································································· 39
(1) 연구참여자 선정········································································· 39
(2) 연구참여자 기본 정보······························································· 41
2) 연구절차·························································································· 42
(1) 연구 현장 한가운데로 들어가기··············································· 43
- vi -
(2) 현장 텍스트 구성하기······························································· 44
(3) 연구 텍스트 작성하기 ······························································ 46
3. 연구의 신뢰성과 타당성····································································· 47
4. 연구의 윤리성····················································································· 49
Ⅳ. 병영생활전문상담관 역할수행 경험 이야기 ···································· 52
1. 정수연의 이야기 ················································································ 52
1) 또래에서도 든든한 언니································································· 52
2) ‘병아리 감별사’ 역할 요구로 정체성 혼란을 겪다······················· 54
3) 병영생활전문상담관의 전문적 역할을 찾아서······························ 56
4) 자살예방교육 및 상담관련 교육 실시··········································· 66
5) 불의에 대항하며 스스로 인권을 지키다······································· 68
6) 상담하면서 통찰을 통해 성장하다················································ 71
7) 받쳐주는 ‘토스 포지션’의 역할······················································ 72
2. 신아름의 이야기 ················································································ 73
1) 집안의 중재자이며 해결사····························································· 73
2) 신교대에서 사례개념화로 임상적 폭을 넓히다···························· 76
3) 임상적 진단과 심층상담을 병행함················································ 77
4) 지휘관의 불안에 전략적으로 대처하다········································· 84
5) 맞춤식 교육을 통해 부대 안정화에 기여····································· 87
6) 회복 탄력성이 생기다···································································· 89
7) ‘자동차의 후방센서’ 역할······························································· 90
3. 김보은의 이야기 ················································································ 91
1) 편견 없이 잘 들어주는 친구·························································· 91
2) 주변의 지지체계를 이용한 상담개입············································· 94
- vii -
3) 또래상담병 활성화 및 자살예방교육 실시···································· 99
4) 삶의 방향을 찾도록 돕는 일에 보람··········································· 100
5) 차가운 ‘마음을 데워주는 티팟’ 역할··········································· 101
Ⅴ. 병영생활전문상담관 역할수행 경험의 의미 ································· 104
1. 기대와 다른 역할에 대한 당혹스러움············································· 104
2. 적절한 지휘조언을 통한 병력관리의 등대역할······························· 105
3. 장병들의 정서적 안정을 돕는 5분 대기조······································ 107
4. 전문상담자와 군 조직의 시냅스로서의 역할 정체성······················ 111
1) 전문상담자로서 역할 정체성 형성··············································· 111
2) 전투력 향상을 돕는 군 조직의 시냅스······································· 112
5. 역할수행에 대한 재인식 및 확장····················································· 115
1) 직업인에서 전문가로 자긍심을 갖다··········································· 115
2) 역할에 대한 객관적 시각과 새로운 책임감을 갖다··················· 116
3) 간부와 군무원까지 상담계획을 세우다······································· 117
Ⅵ. 결론 ···································································································· 119
1. 요약 ·································································································· 119
2. 논의 ·································································································· 122
1) 개인적 정당성················································································ 123
2) 실제적 정당성················································································ 125
3) 사회적 정당성················································································ 131
3. 의의 및 후속연구에 대한 제언························································ 133
4. 내러티브 탐구의 여정을 마치며······················································· 135
- viii -
참고문헌 ··································································································· 137
부록 1 ········································································································ 144
부록 2 ········································································································ 145
Abstract ·································································································· 150

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0