지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 김선웅
- 발행연도
- 2021
- 저작권
- 충북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수5
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The primary objective of this study is to elicit the region-of-origin effect on agri-food purchase. Soybean, apple, pork and its processed food product such as tofu, apple juice and sausage are considered as the research targets. The questionnaire was structured based on choice experiment(CE). Respondents were asked to choose among four alternatives, each described by varying the prices, the cultivation methods, the production areas, and the stores. Respondents were randomly divided into treated and control groups with/without providing the social benefits for using locally grown foods. The random parameter logit model and latent class model were applied to estimate the consumers'' willingness-to-pay (WTP) for the attributes with considering preference heterogeneity.
The results are as the follows: there is no statistical difference in WTP for each attribute between treated and control groups, and these results indicate that providing the social benefits of local foods doesn’t have significant effect on local food purchase. Roughly speaking, consumers have higher WTP for local/domestic agri-food than the imported one, but there is no statistical difference in WTP between ‘local’ and ‘domestic’ except for sausage. Interestingly, the consumer with local food experience in ‘education’ and ‘purchase’ indicates the higher WTP for ‘local’ and ‘domestic’ than the other. Based on the results of LCM, it was found that there were classes with the higher WTP for locally grown products than the domestic one except for pork.
The results are as the follows: there is no statistical difference in WTP for each attribute between treated and control groups, and these results indicate that providing the social benefits of local foods doesn’t have significant effect on local food purchase. Roughly speaking, consumers have higher WTP for local/domestic agri-food than the imported one, but there is no statistical difference in WTP between ‘local’ and ‘domestic’ except for sausage. Interestingly, the consumer with local food experience in ‘education’ and ‘purchase’ indicates the higher WTP for ‘local’ and ‘domestic’ than the other. Based on the results of LCM, it was found that there were classes with the higher WTP for locally grown products than the domestic one except for pork.
목차
차 례표 차례 ⅰ그림차례 ⅲAbstract ⅳⅠ. 서론 1Ⅱ. 선행연구 검토 31. 로컬푸드 구매에 관한 연구 32. 농식품 속성에 관한 연구 43. 선택실험법을 이용한 농식품 관련 연구 54. 농식품의 구매에 지역성이 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 6Ⅲ. 분석자료 71. 실험 설계 72. 표본 추출 153. 분석 자료 16Ⅳ. 분석모형 221. 확률효용모형 222. 로짓 모형 24Ⅴ. 분석결과 291. 척도모수 조정 292. 모형의 적합도 비교 303. 조건부 로짓 모형(CLM)과 랜덤파라미터로짓(RPL) 324. 잠재계층모형(LCM) 분석결과 375. 속성 수준별 지불의사금액 추정 결과 43Ⅵ. 결론 및 시사점 54참고문헌 56※부록 61
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0