지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 정석연, 정경숙
- 발행연도
- 2020
- 저작권
- 대구대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수18
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
2020
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
과거의 양식을 인용하는 ‘복고’는 역사주의에 뿌리를 두고 있다. 역사주의는 이전의 역사적 양식 또는 모티브를 당시의 건축이나 생산품에 응용한 양식으로 과거의 역사성과 시간성을 가져오는 것을 내포하고 있다. 역사주의 양식은 단편적이고 일시적으로 생겨났다가 소멸하는 것이 아니라 지속적이고 반복적으로 등장하는 사회 문화적 현상으로 볼 수 있다. 우리나라에서도 실내디자인의 복고적 성향이 반복되며 최근에는 을지로, 익선동과 같은 지역의 카페·식당 등으로 확장되고 있다. 외식 공간은 소비자의 욕구와 트렌드 변화가 구체적으로 나타나는 공간이며 사람들은 외식공간에서 나타나는 ‘복고’적 디자인에 대하여 호감을 가진다. 외식공간은 실내디자인을 통해 과거양식을 인용하는 복고로 과거와 현재의 문화를 연결하는 감각적인 실현의 장으로서 역할을 함으로써 그 중요성이 대두되고 있다.
본 연구는 외식 공간의 실내디자인 요소와 복고유형에 대한 분석을 통해 실내디자인의 복고적 성향을 역사주의 관점에서 분석함으로써, 향후 우리나라 외식 공간에 대한 복고 디자인의 기초자료를 제공하는 것에 목적이 있다. 연구방법으로는 복고의 발생과 사회배경이 유사한 1970년대와 2010년대의 사례지를 도출하여 문헌조사와 현장조사를 실시하였으며, 조사한 내용을 바탕으로 복고가 나타나는 실내디자인 요소 3가지와 복고유형 3가지로 분류하여 외식공간의 복고를 분석하였으며 분석된 실내디자인 요소와 복고유형을 종합하여 결론을 도출하였다.
연구내용을 종합하면 3가지 특성을 알 수 있다.
첫째, 1970년대 외식공간을 분석하여 각각의 개체에서 적용된 구조, 가구, 장식요소들을 확인하였다. 또한, 각각의 개체를 복고유형에 따라 원형재현, 원형변형, 재조합으로 분류하였다. 분류 결과, 원형재현과 원형 변형유형의 비중이 비슷했으며 실내디자인 요소에 대하여 서양의 구조적 요소를 재해석하여 표현하였고, 장식적 측면에서는 고전적·전통적 재료의 현대적 사용, 이국적 식물의 도입, 한국전통요소의 재구성을 통해 나타났다. 1970년대 외식공간은 서양고전 양식을 재현하여 인용하는 경향과 한국적 패턴, 앞선 시대 가구를 인용하여 형태나 소재를 일부 변경하여 인용하는 경향이 나타났다.
둘째, 2010년대 외식공간을 분석하여 각각의 개체에서 적용된 구조, 가구, 장식요소들을 확인하였다. 또한, 각각의 개체를 복고유형에 따라 원형재현, 원형변형, 재조합으로 분류하였다. 분류결과, 원형변형유형의 비중이 높았으며, 실내디자인 요소에 대하여 한국전통 소품의 현대적 해석을 통한 기능의 변경. 고전가구 형태의 단순화, 구조벽체의 변경 등으로 나타났으며 원형변형·재조합유형은 한 과거시점보다 더 이전의 시점과의 시대공존을 마감재와 소재를 통해 표현하였다. 과거양식의 재현이 중심이었던 1970년대의 양식을 수용함과 동시에 시간의 흐름에 따른 ‘오래된 것’, ‘옛 것’의 가치가 표현된 것으로 볼 수 있다.
셋째, 1970년대와 2010년대의 복고적 성향을 분석한 결과, 복고가 나타나는 실내디자인의 요소와 복고유형의 변화를 유추 할 수 있었고, 반복적으로 나타나는 부분과 시대별로 부각된 특성을 발견할 수 있었다. 1970년대의 경우 구조적으로 ‘코니스’, ‘두꺼운 몰딩’, ‘아치’, ‘아케이드 구조’의 서양고전 양식이 나타났으며 가구적 요소는 ‘앞선 시대의 가구’, ‘서양고전가구’를 인용하였다. 장식적 요소는 ‘카펫 마감’, ‘우드마감’, ‘한국전통패턴 사용’이 다수 나타나는 경향을 보였다. 이에 대한 복고의 유형은 원형 재현의 ‘구조적 모방’, ‘장식적 모방’과 원형 변형의 ‘형태, 소재의 변화’가 확인되었으며 원형재현과 원형 변형의 비율이 비슷하게 나타났다.
2010년대의 경우 구조적 요소는 ‘기존구조(한옥·현대식) 지속’, ‘이중마감기법’ ‘장두리기법’의 이중 구조가 나타났으며 가구적 요소는 서양고전가구를 인용하였다. 장식적 요소는 ‘옛 소품’, ‘시간적 물성재료표현’, ‘브라켓 조명’, ‘샹들리에 조명’, ‘카펫마감’, ‘우드마감’이 다수 나타나는 경향을 보였다. 복고 유형은 원형변형이 원형재현보다 다소 높은 비중을 차지하고 있으며 그 중에서도 ‘형태, 소재의 변화’, ‘새로운 기능부여’의 유형을 확인할 수 있으며 재조합유형에서 ’전통구조에 과거 시점의 실내디자인 요소들이 재구성‘되는 경향이 나타나며 이는 원형 변형유형과 상호적인 조화를 이룬다. 외식공간에서의 복고적 요소는 시대별로 다소 차이가 있음을 발견할 수 있다. 1970년대와 2010년대의 외식공간을 비교 분석한 결과 시대의 변화에도 반복적으로 인용되는 실내디자인 요소가 존재했다. 구조적 요소의 ‘웨인즈코팅’, 가구적 요소의 ‘서양고전가구’, 장식적 요소의 ‘카펫마감’, ‘우드마감’, ‘한국 전통패턴’, ‘회벽마감’이 반복적으로 인용되고 있었다. 복고유형은 두 시대간 다소 차이를 보였다. 종합적으로 외식공간의 복고적 경향의 변화를 확인할 수 있었다. 1970년대 외식공간은 서양고전 양식을 재현하여 인용하는 경향과 한국적 패턴, 앞선 시대 가구를 인용하여 형태나 소재를 일부 변경하여 인용하는 경향이 나타나며 다소 시대 지향적 복고를 표현한다. 실내디자인 요소에서 이를 표현하기 위해 ‘코니스’, ‘몰딩’, ‘아치’, ‘아케이드’, ‘우물천장’과 같은 구조적인 요소를 중점적으로 사용했다. 가구적, 장식적 요소는 보조적인 역할로 우드,카펫과 같은 일부 마감과 한국전통 패턴이 나타나는 요소를 부분적으로 인용하였으나 규모가 큰 외식 공간 외에는 그 비중이 크지 않았다. 2010년대의 외식 공간은 1970년대 구조적 요소의 변화로 복고를 나타내는 경향에서 기존의 내부 구조를 최대한 유지하면서 유동적인 가구적, 장식적 요소로 복고를 표현하는 경향으로 변화하였다. 기존의 전통한옥의 구조를 유지하되 개방감을 위해 구조의 일부를 창으로 변형하는 것 외에는 큰 구조의 변화가 나타나지 않으며 기존의 구조를 노출시키는 방식을 취한다. 2010년대는 1970년대보다 ‘옛소품의 활용’, ‘샹들리에 조명’ ‘브라켓 조명’을 적극적으로 활용하고 있으며 기존 시대 양식을 표현하던 재료에서 ‘시간적 물성재료표현’의 경향을 보인다. 이는 과거의 양식을 인용함에 있어 과거양식의 재현이 중심이었던 1970년대의 양식을 수용함과 동시에 시간의 흐름에 따른 ‘오래된 것’, ‘옛 것’의 가치가 표현된 것으로 볼 수 있다. 복고의 유형은 1970년대에 비해 원형변형유형의 비중이 높아졌으며 원형변형과 재조합 유형, 원형재현과 재조합 유형과 같은 새로운 조합으로 나타남을 확인할 수 있다.
이상으로 본 연구를 통해 우리나라에 외식공간에 대한 역사주의적 특성과 실내요소에 대해 조사 분석하여 사람들의 니즈를 고려한 적합한 실내디자인을 계획하고 외식 공간을 방문하는 사람들의 만족도와 경험의 질을 향상시키며, 이윤 창출에도 도움이 될 것이라 예상한다. 연구를 진행함에 있어 과거의 복고를 분석하기 위해 이전시대의 자료를 수집함에 있어 시간의 흐름에 따라 현장유지가 어렵고, 개보수, 폐업 등의 여건으로 조사의 분석 범위가 한정되는 한계점이 있다. 이러한 이유로 인해 실내디자인의 개념이 정착되기 전과 1950대의 한국전쟁 전후의 실내디자인에 대한 추가적인 연구도 필요하다고 생각된다.
나아가 복고적 양상이 사회문화발전의 과정에서 용어의 변화는 있을 수 있으나 인간의 장식적 본능에 의한 역사주의의 본질은 변하지 않고 반복될 것이라 예상하며 4차 산업을 통해 생겨나는 실내디자인을 인용하는 방식에 대한 추후 연구가 있다면 본 연구가 더 좋은 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.
"Retro", which refers to past forms, is rooted in historicism. Historicism involves bringing the past historical style or motif to the past, in the style of applying it to the architecture and products of the time, and bringing historicality. The historical form is not fragmentary and occurring temporarily not disappearing, It can be seen in socio-cultural phenomena that appear continuously and repeatedly. In Korea, interior design has been reviving,Recently, it has been expanded to local cafes and restaurants such as Euljiro and Ixondon.. The dining area is where the needs and trends of the consumer are specifically represented, people like the "retro" design displayed in the restaurant. Dining space is gaining in importance by using interior design to serve as a sensational place to connect past and present cultures with retro quotations of past forms.
The purpose of this study is to provide basic data on the retro design of restaurant space in Korea by analyzing the retro trend of interior design from the viewpoint of historicalism through analysis of interior design elements and retro type of restaurant space. The research method derives from the case of the 1970s and 2010s, because appeared the occurrence of retro, literature survey and a field survey were conducted, and based on the contents of the survey, retrospects of dining spaces were analyzed by classifying them into three types of interior design elementsdisplaying retro and three types of retro types. A conclusion is drawn by combining the analyzed interior design elements and retrotypes. Comprehensively, we can learn three characteristics.
First, he analyzed the restaurant space in the 1970s and identified the structure, furniture, and decorative elements applied to each object. In addition, each object was classified into a the original form reappearance, the original form transform and recombination according to the retrotype.
As a result of the classification, the ratio of the original form reappearance and the original form transform type is similar and the interior design element is reinterpreted and expressed as a western structural element, and the decorative aspect is The modern use of traditional materials has been revealed through the introduction of exotic plants and the reconstruction of Korean traditional elements. Dining space in the 1970s tended to recreate the classic Western style and quoted Korean style advanced furniture, with some changes in shape and material.
Secondly, we analyzed the restaurant space in the 2010s and identified the structures, furniture and decorative elements applied to each object. In addition, each object was classified into the original form reappearance, the original form transform and recombination according to the retrotype. As a result of classification, the ratio of circular deformation type is higher than the original form reappearance. The function of interior design elements is changed through modern interpretation of Korean traditional accessories, appearing with simplification of classic furniture shapes and structural wall changes. The original form transform and recombination type expresses the coexistence of the era with a time earlier than the past time using finishing and materials. It contains the forms of the 1970s, which mainly recreated past forms, and can be seen as expressing the value of "old" and "old days" along the flow of time.
Third, as a result of analyzing the retro trend of the 1970s and 2010s, it was possible to infer the elements of the interior design where retro was and the changes in the retro type and Characteristics could be found. In the case of the 1970s, the Western classic style of "cornice", "thick molding", "arch", and "arcade structure" appeared, and the furniture elements were Quoted “furniture of the advanced era" and "Western classic furniture. The decorative elements tended to show a lot of “carpet finish”, “wood finish” and “use Korean traditional pattern”. In contrast, the retro type has been confirmed as ``structural imitation'''' of the original form reappearance, ``decorative imitation'''' and ``change in shape and material'''' of the original form transform. the ratio of the original form reappearance and the original form transform type appears similarly. In the case of the 2010''s, the structural elements are displayed as “continuous existing structure (Hanok / Modern)”, “double finishing technique” and “jeanpuri technique”, and furniture elements are Quoted Western classic furniture. Decorative elements show a tendency to display a large number of "old accessories", "temporal physical material expression", "bracket lighting", "chandelier lighting", "carpet finish", and "wood finish". In the retro type, the original form transform type accounts for a slightly higher percentage than the original form reappearance . Among them, the types of "changes in shape and material" and "addition of new functions" can be confirmed, and there is a tendency that "reconstruction of elements of past interior design into traditional structures" is a recombinant type. Reciprocal harmony with circular deformation type. It is possible to discover that the elements of the retro in the dining space vary slightly from one era to another. As a result of a comparative analysis of the restaurant space in the 1970s and 2010s, there were elements of interior design that were repeatedly quoted in the changing times. Structural elements "Wanes coating", furniture elements "Western classic furniture", decorative elements "Carpet finish", "Wood finish", "Traditional Korean pattern", "Fyebyeok finish" are repeatedly quoted Was. The retrotype showed some differences between the two eras. It was possible to confirm the change in the retrofitting tendency of the dining space comprehensively. In the 1970s restaurant space, there is a tendency to cite and recreate the classic Western style, and to quote Korean patterns and advanced era furniture with some changes in the shape and materials. The emphasis on structural elements such as "cornice", "molding", "arch", "arcade", "well ceiling" to express this in the elements of interior design. Furniture and decorative elements partially quote elements that display some finishing and Korean traditional patterns, such as wood and carpet, as ancillary roles, except for large dining spaces Was not big.1970s was maintaining the existing internal structure to the maximum. but, Restaurant space in the 2010s tends to show maintain in structural elements in the changing to the trend of expressing retro with flexible furniture and decorative elements did. Although the structure of the existing traditional Hanok is maintained, a large structural change is not displayed except for transforming a part of the structure for a sense of openness into a window, and the existing structure is exposed. In the 2010s, "Utilization of old accessories", "Chandelier lighting", and "Bracket lighting" have been actively used. In quoting the past form, this contains the form of the 1970s, which was mainly a reproduction of the past form, and expressed the value of "old" and "old days" along the flow of time Can be seen. As for the retro type, the ratio of the original form transform type is higher than in the 1970s, and it can be confirmed that the original form transform, the recombination type, the original form reappearance, and the new combination such as the recombination type.
Through this research ,analyzed the historicism characteristics and interior elements of the restaurant space in Korea.
Through this research, designed an appropriate interior design that takes into account the needs of the people, and improve the level of satisfaction and quality of experience for those who visit the restaurant space, We expectates that it will help improve profits and generate profits. In progressing the research, collecting data from the previous era in order to analyze the past retros, it is difficult to maintain the past restaurant space and site along the flow of time, there is a limit point that limits the analysis range. For these reasons, there is a need for additional research on 1950 pre-Korean war interior designs before the concept of interior design is established and more past era.
Furthermore, while the retrospective is in the process of the development of social culture, the terminology changes, but repeat the essence of historicalism is expacted due to the decorative instinct of human beings. If there is further research on the method of quoting the interior design generated through the 4th industry, this study can be used as a better data.
본 연구는 외식 공간의 실내디자인 요소와 복고유형에 대한 분석을 통해 실내디자인의 복고적 성향을 역사주의 관점에서 분석함으로써, 향후 우리나라 외식 공간에 대한 복고 디자인의 기초자료를 제공하는 것에 목적이 있다. 연구방법으로는 복고의 발생과 사회배경이 유사한 1970년대와 2010년대의 사례지를 도출하여 문헌조사와 현장조사를 실시하였으며, 조사한 내용을 바탕으로 복고가 나타나는 실내디자인 요소 3가지와 복고유형 3가지로 분류하여 외식공간의 복고를 분석하였으며 분석된 실내디자인 요소와 복고유형을 종합하여 결론을 도출하였다.
연구내용을 종합하면 3가지 특성을 알 수 있다.
첫째, 1970년대 외식공간을 분석하여 각각의 개체에서 적용된 구조, 가구, 장식요소들을 확인하였다. 또한, 각각의 개체를 복고유형에 따라 원형재현, 원형변형, 재조합으로 분류하였다. 분류 결과, 원형재현과 원형 변형유형의 비중이 비슷했으며 실내디자인 요소에 대하여 서양의 구조적 요소를 재해석하여 표현하였고, 장식적 측면에서는 고전적·전통적 재료의 현대적 사용, 이국적 식물의 도입, 한국전통요소의 재구성을 통해 나타났다. 1970년대 외식공간은 서양고전 양식을 재현하여 인용하는 경향과 한국적 패턴, 앞선 시대 가구를 인용하여 형태나 소재를 일부 변경하여 인용하는 경향이 나타났다.
둘째, 2010년대 외식공간을 분석하여 각각의 개체에서 적용된 구조, 가구, 장식요소들을 확인하였다. 또한, 각각의 개체를 복고유형에 따라 원형재현, 원형변형, 재조합으로 분류하였다. 분류결과, 원형변형유형의 비중이 높았으며, 실내디자인 요소에 대하여 한국전통 소품의 현대적 해석을 통한 기능의 변경. 고전가구 형태의 단순화, 구조벽체의 변경 등으로 나타났으며 원형변형·재조합유형은 한 과거시점보다 더 이전의 시점과의 시대공존을 마감재와 소재를 통해 표현하였다. 과거양식의 재현이 중심이었던 1970년대의 양식을 수용함과 동시에 시간의 흐름에 따른 ‘오래된 것’, ‘옛 것’의 가치가 표현된 것으로 볼 수 있다.
셋째, 1970년대와 2010년대의 복고적 성향을 분석한 결과, 복고가 나타나는 실내디자인의 요소와 복고유형의 변화를 유추 할 수 있었고, 반복적으로 나타나는 부분과 시대별로 부각된 특성을 발견할 수 있었다. 1970년대의 경우 구조적으로 ‘코니스’, ‘두꺼운 몰딩’, ‘아치’, ‘아케이드 구조’의 서양고전 양식이 나타났으며 가구적 요소는 ‘앞선 시대의 가구’, ‘서양고전가구’를 인용하였다. 장식적 요소는 ‘카펫 마감’, ‘우드마감’, ‘한국전통패턴 사용’이 다수 나타나는 경향을 보였다. 이에 대한 복고의 유형은 원형 재현의 ‘구조적 모방’, ‘장식적 모방’과 원형 변형의 ‘형태, 소재의 변화’가 확인되었으며 원형재현과 원형 변형의 비율이 비슷하게 나타났다.
2010년대의 경우 구조적 요소는 ‘기존구조(한옥·현대식) 지속’, ‘이중마감기법’ ‘장두리기법’의 이중 구조가 나타났으며 가구적 요소는 서양고전가구를 인용하였다. 장식적 요소는 ‘옛 소품’, ‘시간적 물성재료표현’, ‘브라켓 조명’, ‘샹들리에 조명’, ‘카펫마감’, ‘우드마감’이 다수 나타나는 경향을 보였다. 복고 유형은 원형변형이 원형재현보다 다소 높은 비중을 차지하고 있으며 그 중에서도 ‘형태, 소재의 변화’, ‘새로운 기능부여’의 유형을 확인할 수 있으며 재조합유형에서 ’전통구조에 과거 시점의 실내디자인 요소들이 재구성‘되는 경향이 나타나며 이는 원형 변형유형과 상호적인 조화를 이룬다. 외식공간에서의 복고적 요소는 시대별로 다소 차이가 있음을 발견할 수 있다. 1970년대와 2010년대의 외식공간을 비교 분석한 결과 시대의 변화에도 반복적으로 인용되는 실내디자인 요소가 존재했다. 구조적 요소의 ‘웨인즈코팅’, 가구적 요소의 ‘서양고전가구’, 장식적 요소의 ‘카펫마감’, ‘우드마감’, ‘한국 전통패턴’, ‘회벽마감’이 반복적으로 인용되고 있었다. 복고유형은 두 시대간 다소 차이를 보였다. 종합적으로 외식공간의 복고적 경향의 변화를 확인할 수 있었다. 1970년대 외식공간은 서양고전 양식을 재현하여 인용하는 경향과 한국적 패턴, 앞선 시대 가구를 인용하여 형태나 소재를 일부 변경하여 인용하는 경향이 나타나며 다소 시대 지향적 복고를 표현한다. 실내디자인 요소에서 이를 표현하기 위해 ‘코니스’, ‘몰딩’, ‘아치’, ‘아케이드’, ‘우물천장’과 같은 구조적인 요소를 중점적으로 사용했다. 가구적, 장식적 요소는 보조적인 역할로 우드,카펫과 같은 일부 마감과 한국전통 패턴이 나타나는 요소를 부분적으로 인용하였으나 규모가 큰 외식 공간 외에는 그 비중이 크지 않았다. 2010년대의 외식 공간은 1970년대 구조적 요소의 변화로 복고를 나타내는 경향에서 기존의 내부 구조를 최대한 유지하면서 유동적인 가구적, 장식적 요소로 복고를 표현하는 경향으로 변화하였다. 기존의 전통한옥의 구조를 유지하되 개방감을 위해 구조의 일부를 창으로 변형하는 것 외에는 큰 구조의 변화가 나타나지 않으며 기존의 구조를 노출시키는 방식을 취한다. 2010년대는 1970년대보다 ‘옛소품의 활용’, ‘샹들리에 조명’ ‘브라켓 조명’을 적극적으로 활용하고 있으며 기존 시대 양식을 표현하던 재료에서 ‘시간적 물성재료표현’의 경향을 보인다. 이는 과거의 양식을 인용함에 있어 과거양식의 재현이 중심이었던 1970년대의 양식을 수용함과 동시에 시간의 흐름에 따른 ‘오래된 것’, ‘옛 것’의 가치가 표현된 것으로 볼 수 있다. 복고의 유형은 1970년대에 비해 원형변형유형의 비중이 높아졌으며 원형변형과 재조합 유형, 원형재현과 재조합 유형과 같은 새로운 조합으로 나타남을 확인할 수 있다.
이상으로 본 연구를 통해 우리나라에 외식공간에 대한 역사주의적 특성과 실내요소에 대해 조사 분석하여 사람들의 니즈를 고려한 적합한 실내디자인을 계획하고 외식 공간을 방문하는 사람들의 만족도와 경험의 질을 향상시키며, 이윤 창출에도 도움이 될 것이라 예상한다. 연구를 진행함에 있어 과거의 복고를 분석하기 위해 이전시대의 자료를 수집함에 있어 시간의 흐름에 따라 현장유지가 어렵고, 개보수, 폐업 등의 여건으로 조사의 분석 범위가 한정되는 한계점이 있다. 이러한 이유로 인해 실내디자인의 개념이 정착되기 전과 1950대의 한국전쟁 전후의 실내디자인에 대한 추가적인 연구도 필요하다고 생각된다.
나아가 복고적 양상이 사회문화발전의 과정에서 용어의 변화는 있을 수 있으나 인간의 장식적 본능에 의한 역사주의의 본질은 변하지 않고 반복될 것이라 예상하며 4차 산업을 통해 생겨나는 실내디자인을 인용하는 방식에 대한 추후 연구가 있다면 본 연구가 더 좋은 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.
"Retro", which refers to past forms, is rooted in historicism. Historicism involves bringing the past historical style or motif to the past, in the style of applying it to the architecture and products of the time, and bringing historicality. The historical form is not fragmentary and occurring temporarily not disappearing, It can be seen in socio-cultural phenomena that appear continuously and repeatedly. In Korea, interior design has been reviving,Recently, it has been expanded to local cafes and restaurants such as Euljiro and Ixondon.. The dining area is where the needs and trends of the consumer are specifically represented, people like the "retro" design displayed in the restaurant. Dining space is gaining in importance by using interior design to serve as a sensational place to connect past and present cultures with retro quotations of past forms.
The purpose of this study is to provide basic data on the retro design of restaurant space in Korea by analyzing the retro trend of interior design from the viewpoint of historicalism through analysis of interior design elements and retro type of restaurant space. The research method derives from the case of the 1970s and 2010s, because appeared the occurrence of retro, literature survey and a field survey were conducted, and based on the contents of the survey, retrospects of dining spaces were analyzed by classifying them into three types of interior design elementsdisplaying retro and three types of retro types. A conclusion is drawn by combining the analyzed interior design elements and retrotypes. Comprehensively, we can learn three characteristics.
First, he analyzed the restaurant space in the 1970s and identified the structure, furniture, and decorative elements applied to each object. In addition, each object was classified into a the original form reappearance, the original form transform and recombination according to the retrotype.
As a result of the classification, the ratio of the original form reappearance and the original form transform type is similar and the interior design element is reinterpreted and expressed as a western structural element, and the decorative aspect is The modern use of traditional materials has been revealed through the introduction of exotic plants and the reconstruction of Korean traditional elements. Dining space in the 1970s tended to recreate the classic Western style and quoted Korean style advanced furniture, with some changes in shape and material.
Secondly, we analyzed the restaurant space in the 2010s and identified the structures, furniture and decorative elements applied to each object. In addition, each object was classified into the original form reappearance, the original form transform and recombination according to the retrotype. As a result of classification, the ratio of circular deformation type is higher than the original form reappearance. The function of interior design elements is changed through modern interpretation of Korean traditional accessories, appearing with simplification of classic furniture shapes and structural wall changes. The original form transform and recombination type expresses the coexistence of the era with a time earlier than the past time using finishing and materials. It contains the forms of the 1970s, which mainly recreated past forms, and can be seen as expressing the value of "old" and "old days" along the flow of time.
Third, as a result of analyzing the retro trend of the 1970s and 2010s, it was possible to infer the elements of the interior design where retro was and the changes in the retro type and Characteristics could be found. In the case of the 1970s, the Western classic style of "cornice", "thick molding", "arch", and "arcade structure" appeared, and the furniture elements were Quoted “furniture of the advanced era" and "Western classic furniture. The decorative elements tended to show a lot of “carpet finish”, “wood finish” and “use Korean traditional pattern”. In contrast, the retro type has been confirmed as ``structural imitation'''' of the original form reappearance, ``decorative imitation'''' and ``change in shape and material'''' of the original form transform. the ratio of the original form reappearance and the original form transform type appears similarly. In the case of the 2010''s, the structural elements are displayed as “continuous existing structure (Hanok / Modern)”, “double finishing technique” and “jeanpuri technique”, and furniture elements are Quoted Western classic furniture. Decorative elements show a tendency to display a large number of "old accessories", "temporal physical material expression", "bracket lighting", "chandelier lighting", "carpet finish", and "wood finish". In the retro type, the original form transform type accounts for a slightly higher percentage than the original form reappearance . Among them, the types of "changes in shape and material" and "addition of new functions" can be confirmed, and there is a tendency that "reconstruction of elements of past interior design into traditional structures" is a recombinant type. Reciprocal harmony with circular deformation type. It is possible to discover that the elements of the retro in the dining space vary slightly from one era to another. As a result of a comparative analysis of the restaurant space in the 1970s and 2010s, there were elements of interior design that were repeatedly quoted in the changing times. Structural elements "Wanes coating", furniture elements "Western classic furniture", decorative elements "Carpet finish", "Wood finish", "Traditional Korean pattern", "Fyebyeok finish" are repeatedly quoted Was. The retrotype showed some differences between the two eras. It was possible to confirm the change in the retrofitting tendency of the dining space comprehensively. In the 1970s restaurant space, there is a tendency to cite and recreate the classic Western style, and to quote Korean patterns and advanced era furniture with some changes in the shape and materials. The emphasis on structural elements such as "cornice", "molding", "arch", "arcade", "well ceiling" to express this in the elements of interior design. Furniture and decorative elements partially quote elements that display some finishing and Korean traditional patterns, such as wood and carpet, as ancillary roles, except for large dining spaces Was not big.1970s was maintaining the existing internal structure to the maximum. but, Restaurant space in the 2010s tends to show maintain in structural elements in the changing to the trend of expressing retro with flexible furniture and decorative elements did. Although the structure of the existing traditional Hanok is maintained, a large structural change is not displayed except for transforming a part of the structure for a sense of openness into a window, and the existing structure is exposed. In the 2010s, "Utilization of old accessories", "Chandelier lighting", and "Bracket lighting" have been actively used. In quoting the past form, this contains the form of the 1970s, which was mainly a reproduction of the past form, and expressed the value of "old" and "old days" along the flow of time Can be seen. As for the retro type, the ratio of the original form transform type is higher than in the 1970s, and it can be confirmed that the original form transform, the recombination type, the original form reappearance, and the new combination such as the recombination type.
Through this research ,analyzed the historicism characteristics and interior elements of the restaurant space in Korea.
Through this research, designed an appropriate interior design that takes into account the needs of the people, and improve the level of satisfaction and quality of experience for those who visit the restaurant space, We expectates that it will help improve profits and generate profits. In progressing the research, collecting data from the previous era in order to analyze the past retros, it is difficult to maintain the past restaurant space and site along the flow of time, there is a limit point that limits the analysis range. For these reasons, there is a need for additional research on 1950 pre-Korean war interior designs before the concept of interior design is established and more past era.
Furthermore, while the retrospective is in the process of the development of social culture, the terminology changes, but repeat the essence of historicalism is expacted due to the decorative instinct of human beings. If there is further research on the method of quoting the interior design generated through the 4th industry, this study can be used as a better data.
목차
목 차Ⅰ. 서 론 ··········································································································· 11. 연구 배경 및 목적 ·········································································· 12. 연구 범위 및 방법 ·········································································· 33. 연구 흐름도 ······················································································ 3II. 이론적 배경 ·············································································· 51. 역사주의(historicism) 이론 ························································· 51) 역사주의 등장 배경 ··············································································· 52) 역사주의와 원기능주의 ········································································· 53) 원기능주의의 한계 ················································································· 64) 역사주의 특징 ······················································································· 72. 현대 한국 사회 고찰 ······································································ 81) 1945 ? 1960년대 ··················································································· 82) 1970년대 ································································································· 93) 1980년대 ································································································· 104) 1990년대 ································································································· 115) 2000-2010년대 ······················································································ 123. 한국 실내디자인 양상 ·································································· 131) 1945- 1960년대 ···················································································· 152) 1970년대 ······························································································· 173) 1980년대 ································································································· 184) 1990년대 ································································································· 195) 2000년-2010년대 ·················································································· 21Ⅲ. 실내디자인의 복고요소 및 복고유형 분석 ·················· 251. 조사대상지 개요 ········································································ 251) 사례분석 대상 선정 ··········································································· 252) 조사 내용 및 범위 ··············································································· 273) 외식공간의 복고요소 ·············································································272. 실내디자인 복고 요소 분석 ·················································· 301) 구조적 요소 ··························································································· 312) 가구적 요소 ························································································· 313) 장식적 요소 ··························································································· 323. 실내디자인 복고유형 분석 ························································ 331) 원형 재현 ······························································································· 332) 원형 변형 ······························································································· 343) 시대 재조합 ··························································································· 35Ⅳ. 우리나라 외식공간의 복고적 경향분석 ························ 381. 사례별 실내디자인 복고 분석 ················································ 381) 1970년대 외식 공간 분석 ································································· 382) 2010년대 외식 공간 분석 ································································· 512. 외식공간의 복고적 경향 및 종합분석 ···································· 691) 시대별 외식공간 복고분석 ····························································· 692) 외식공간의 복고적 경향 종합분석 ················································· 723. 소결 ······························································································ 75Ⅴ. 결론 ························································································· 77참고문헌 ························································································ 81
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0