메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

한희주 (대전대학교, 대전대학교 대학원)

지도교수
김선엽
발행연도
2020
저작권
대전대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수18

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Pregnancy-related low back pain(PLBP) had few systematic guidelines compared to pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain(PPGP); previous studies have not evaluated physical therapy for this ailment in Korea. Women-health physical therapy has been in spotlight recently in Korea and accordingly, basic information is needed for further research in this field.
Objects: This study aimed to provide a detailed account of clinical decision making for the treatment of PLBP by Korean physiotherapists. Also, it aimed to compare awareness of women’s health physiotherapy by various measures.
Methods: A total of 955 questionnaires were distributed mainly in the places of maintenance education by the Korean Physical Therapy Association(KPTA) from April to July 2019. The same questionnaire was posted on the homepage used by physiotherapists. The questionnaire aimed at collecting subject information, a specific vignette typically represent symptoms of PLBP, and responses to multiple questions about decision making, subjective recognition and interest level in women’s health physiotherapy(WHPT) field. Awareness of WHPT was analyzed with various methods.
Results: The overall response rate was 56%(537); of these, responses to 520 questionnaires were analyzed. Most respondents chose various combinations of physical therapy methods. There were significant differences in the subjective recognition level of WHPT according to gender(p=.039), age(p=.004), education level(p=.000), and clinical experience(p=.019). There was a significant difference in interest according to gender(p=.000) and education level(p=.001). With respect to the types of treatment, significant differences were noted in selective rates in “manual therapy”, “pain control”, and “supportive devices”, based on gender. Manual therapy tended to have a higher proportion of choices with increasing age(Spearman’s rho=.148**) and clinical experience(=153**). Pain treatment had a lower selection weight as education level increased(=-.143**).
Conclusion: This is the first survey data about how Korean physiotherapist manage PLBP patient by vignette method. We were able to recognize the Korean physical therapist''s decision on PLBP patients got some interesting correlations that were statistically significant. This may aid in developing future research and education plans in WHPT field.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론 1
Ⅱ. 연구 방법 4
1. 연구대상자 4
2. 설문구성과 설문방법 및 절차 5
1) 설문구성 5
2) 설문방법 및 절차 7
3. 분석 방법 8
Ⅲ. 연구 결과 9
1. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 9
2. 임신관련 요통 환자(비네트 환자)에 대한 임상적 의사결정 11
3. 일반적 특성에 따른 여성건강 물리치료 분야에 대한 주관적 인지 및 관심수준 14
4. 다중응답 분석을 이용한 일반적 특성에 따른 물리치료 유형 16
5. 여성건강 물리치료에 대한 인식 18
1) 설문의 타당도 및 신뢰도 18
2) 여성건강 물리치료 인식도 23
(1) 명목척도에 따른 여성건강 물리치료 인식도 차이 분석 24
(2) 등간척도와 서열척도에 따른 여성건강 물리치료 인식도 상관분석 26
3) 임상에서 여성건강 물리치료 수행에 관한 애로사항 29
(1) 애로 사항 29
(2) 해결 방안 30
(3) 여성건강 물리치료 전문가 양성 32
① 여성건강 물리치료 전문가 양성과정 교과목 및 교육시간 32
② 여성건강 물리치료 전문가 양성에 적합한 교육기관 34
③ 여성건강 물리치료 학회 인식 수준 36
Ⅳ. 고 찰 37
Ⅴ. 결 론 42
참 고 문 헌 43
영 문 초 록 47
부 록 49
감 사 의 글 56

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0