응급구조(학)과 학생들의 방사선 방어에 대한 지식, 태도와 교육요구 제 출 자 : 김 승 국 지도교수 : 고 대 식 이 연구는 응급구조(학)과 학생들을 대상으로 방사선 방어에 대한 지식, 태도 및 교육요구도를 파악하여 방사선 방어의 중요성을 인식하게 하고, 응급구조(학)과 학생들에게 방사선 방어를 위한 안전관리의 맞춤형 교육프로그램 개발에 기초자료를 제공하기 위하여 시도되었다. 이 연구는 G 광역시에 소재한 대학교에서 임상실습 경험이 있는 3학년, 4학년 학생을 대상으로 하였다. 자료수집은 2019년 11월 9일부터 11월 11일까지 시행하였으며, 총 254부의 설문지를 배부하였다. 회수된 설문지 중 불성실한 응답, 무응답한 10부를 제외하고 총 244부의 설문지가 분석에 사용되었다. 이 연구의 설문지는 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 6문항, 방사선 방어에 대한 지식 15문항, 방사선 방어에 대한 태도 7문항, 방사선 방어에 대한 교육요구도 9문항으로 총 37문항으로 구성하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS 21.0 ver. for Window 통계 프로그램을 사용하여 통계처리를 하였으며, 빈도수와 백분율, 평균과 표준편차, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson''s correlation coefficient를 실시하였다. 이 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성에서 성별은 여자가 50.4%, 연령은 22세 이상이 58.2%, 학년은 3학년이 49.6%로 가장 많았다. 성적은 중위권이 61.1%이었고, 응급실 실습 기간은 4주 이상이 83.2%로 가장 많았고, 방사선 방어 교육 경험은 ‘없다’가 93.9%로 가장 많았다. 연구대상자의 방사선 방어에 대한 지식 점수는 총 15점 만점에 평균 9.50점이었고 문항 중 ‘방사선 피폭으로 인해 인체에 장해가 나타날 수 있다’가 96.7%, ‘방사선 피폭이 유전적인 영향을 줄 수 있다’가 90.2% 순으로 높았고, ‘방사선 방어용 납 앞치마는 영구히 사용할 수 있다’가 30.7%로 가장 점수가 낮았다. 방사선 방어의 지식 점수는 방사선 방어 교육을 받은 군이 받지 않은 군에 비해 통계학적으로 유의하게 높았다(t=-2.437, p=.042). 방사선 방어 태도 점수는 총 35점 만점으로 평균 30.24점이었다. 문항 중 ‘방사선 조사지역에서 작업 시 방호복을 착용해야 한다’ 문항이 가장 적극적인 태도를 보였고(M=4.57, SD=.59), ‘방사선 피폭과 관련하여 매년 정기적인 건강진단을 받아야 한다’ 문항이 가장 소극적인 태도를 보였다(M=4.13, SD=.83). 방사선 방어의 태도 점수는 방사선 방어 교육을 받은 군이 받지 않은 군에 비해 통계학적으로 유의하게 높았다(t=2.843, p=.040). 방사선 방어에 대한 교육 여부와 교육요구에서 교육을 받은 대상자 15명 중 1회는 93.33%, 2회는 6.67%이었고, 교육의 필요성에 대한 설문에서 ‘예’라고 대답한 응답자가 87.3%, ‘아니요’라고 대답한 응답자가 12.7%이었다. 방사선 방어 교육의 참여 의향은 응답자의 82%가 참여 의향이 있다고 응답하였고, 교육시기는 2학년이 54.9%로 가장 높았고, 교육방법은 시청각 교재를 활용한 강의가 59.04%로 가장 높았고, 강연자는 방사선사가 77.45%로 가장 높았다. 방사선 방어에 대한 지식과 태도 간의 상관관계에서는 방사선 방어에 대한 태도 점수와 지식 점수와는 양의 상관관계를 보였다(r=.472, p<.000). 즉, 응급구조학과 학생들의 지식점수가 높아질수록 태도 점수가 높아진다는 것을 의미한다. 이 연구의 결과를 토대로 응급구조(학)과 학생들의 방사선 방어에 대한 교육요구와 참여 의도가 높음을 알 수 있었고, 방사선 방어에 대한 정확한 지식과 적극적인 태도를 가지고 방사선 방어 안전관리 교육프로그램 개발이 요구되며, 교육 효과를 높이기 위해서는 방사선사가 시청각 교재를 활용하여 교육을 실시하는 것이 가장 효과적이라는 결론을 얻었다. 주제어 : 응급구조학과 학생, 방사선 방어, 지식, 태도, 교육요구
ABSTRACT Knowledge, Attitude, and Educational Needs of Radiation protection Among Paramedic students Seong-Guk. Kim Supervised by Professor Dae-Sik Ko
This study was attempted to identify the knowledge of radiation protection, attitude, and education needs in Emergency Rescue Department students to recognize the importance of radiation protection and provide the basic data for developing personalized educational programs for safety management in radiation protection for Emergency Rescue Department students. This study was conducted in juniors and seniors who had clinical experience at the universities located in G Metropolitan City. The data collection was conducted from Nov. 9 to Nov. 11, 2019 and a total of 254 questionnaires were distributed. Among the questionnaires collected, a total of 244 questionnaires were used for analysis except 10 copies of the questionnaire having unfaithful and non-responses. The survey questionnaire for this study is composed of total 37 question items: 6 for general characteristics of subjects, 15 for knowledge about radiation protection, 7 for attitude toward radiation protection, and 9 for education needs for radiation protection. The data collected were analyzed with SPSS 21.0 for statistical processing, and frequency and percentage, mean and standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson''s correlation coefficient were conducted. The study findings are as follows. To look at the general characteristics of study subjects, it was found that in gender females occupied 50.4% and in age, 22 years or higher occupied 58.2%, and in school year, third graders(or juniors) were the most at 49.6%. In school grade, middle rank was 61.1% and in period of actual training at the emergency rooms, 4 weeks or higher was the most at 83.2%, and in education about radiation protection, ‘none’ was the most at 93.9%. Study subjects’ knowledge about radiation protection score was 9.50 point on average in a total of 15 points, among the question items ‘Disability to human body can appear due to radiation exposure’ was 96.7% and ‘Radiation exposure can have heredity effects’ 90.2% in order and ‘Lead apron for radiation protection can be used for ever’ was the lowest at 30.7%, and knowledge about radiation protection score was statistically significantly higher in the group who received instruction about radiation protection than in the group who didn’t (t=-2.437, p=.042). The attitude toward radiation protection was 30.24 point on average in a total of 35 points. Among the question items, the item ‘Should wear protective clothing before work at the radiated area’ showed the most positive attitude (M=4.57, SD=.59) and ‘Should take a regular medical checkup regarding the radiation exposure’ showed the most passive attitude (M=4.13, SD=.83), and the knowledge about radiation protection score was statistically significantly higher in the group who received instruction about radiation protection than the group who didn’t (t=2.843, p=.040). Among the subjects (15 individuals) who received instruction in education about radiation protection and education needs, one time was 93.33% and twice 6.67%, and in the questionnaire about the necessity of education, the responders who said ‘Yes’ occupied 87.3% and those who said ‘No’ 12.7%. In participation intention into the education about the radiation protection, 82% of the responders said that they had participation intention. In time when they are to be educated, 2nd graders was the highest at 54.9%, in instructional method, lecture with audiovisual materials was the highest at 59.04%, and in lecturer, radiological technologist was the highest at 77.45%. In the correlation between knowledge about radiation protection and attitude toward it, there was a positive correlation between attitude score and knowledge score regarding the radiation protection (r=.472, p<.000). In other words, this suggests that the higher the Emergency Rescue Department students’ knowledge score becomes, the higher the students’ attitude score becomes. It could be found from such findings that Emergency Rescue Department students’ education needs for radiation protection and participation intention were high and concluded that safety management educational program development for radiation protection is required with accurate knowledge about radiation protection and positive attitude and to increase the educational effects, radiological technologist’s utilizing the audiovisual materials for instruction is the most effective.
목 차제 1장 서론 ·························································· 1제 1절 연구의 필요성 ·············································· 1제 2절 연구의 목적 ················································ 4제 3절 용어정의 ···················································· 51. 방사선 방어에 대한 지식 ······································· 52. 방사선 방어에 대한 태도 ······································· 53. 방사선 방어에 대한 교육요구 ·································· 6제 2장 연구 방법 ···················································· 7제1절 연구 설계 ···················································· 7제2절 연구 대상 ···················································· 7제3절 연구 도구 ···················································· 71. 일반적 특성 ···················································· 72. 방사선 방어에 대한 지식 ······································· 73. 방사선 방어에 대한 태도 ······································· 84. 방사선 방어에 대한 교육요구도 ································ 8제 4절 자료수집 및 절차 ·········································· 8제 5절 자료분석 방법 ·············································· 9제3장 연구결과 ······················································ 101. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성 ·································· 102. 방사선 방어 지식 ············································· 123. 방사선 방어 태도·············································· 154. 방사선 방어에 대한 교육 여부와 교육요구····················· 185. 방사선 방어에 대한 지식과 태도간의 상관관계················· 24제4장 고찰 ··························································· 25제5장 결론 및 제언 ················································ 29제 1절 결론 ······················································· 29제 2절 제언 ························································ 30참고문헌 ······························································ 31부록 ··································································· 351. 연구 대상자 참여 동의서 ··································· 352. 설문지 ······················································· 36Abstract ······························································ 41