메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김희정 (경북대학교, 경북대학교 대학원)

지도교수
권소희
발행연도
2020
저작권
경북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수20

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

2021

개념지도와 PASS-BAR를 활용한 인수인계 교육의 효과
김희정 ,  권소희 기본간호학회지 2021.02 학술저널

2020

개념지도와 PASS-BAR를 활용한 인수인계 교육의 효과
김희정 간호학과 2020.01 학위논문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the effects of handoff education using concept mapping and PASS-BAR(HECPAR) for new nurses.
Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial in a tertiary hospital with 41 new nurses from July 6th to August 31st 2019. Twenty two new nurses were randomly allocated into an experimental and control group, respectively. The experimental group were received a standardized education using concept mapping and PASS-BAR for 1 hour, then individualized monitoring for a week. The control group continued usual informal handoffs. The outcomes included clinical reasoning competence, handoff ability, and self-efficacy of handoff. Pre-test and post-test assessed clinical reasoning competence, handoff ability and self-efficacy of hadnoff at intervals of two weeks. The data are analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and independent t-test using the SPSS WIN 26.0 program.
Result: The experimental group improved significantly in clinical reasoning competence(z=-2.29, p=.022), handoff ability(z=-2.23, p=.026), self-efficacy of handoff(t=3.47, p=.001) versus the control group.
Conclusion: Handoff education using Concept Mapping and PASS-BAR has been found a effectiveness in improving clinical reasoning competence, handoff ability, and self-efficacy of handoff. It also confirmed that education is possible by incorporating Concept Mapping, PASS-BAR, and mentoring. Therefore, it is believed that it can be used as an effective educational intervention to improve the handoff capability of new nurses.

목차

서론 ·····················································································································1
연구의 필요성 ·····································································································1
연구목적 ············································································································4
연구가설 ············································································································4
용어정의 ············································································································5
문헌고찰 ··············································································································7
간호사의 인수인계 ······························································································7
인수인계 교육 ···································································································11
개념지도를 활용한 간호교육 ···············································································14
연구의 개념적 기틀 ····························································································17
연구방법 ·············································································································18
연구설계 ···········································································································18
연구대상 ···········································································································19
자료수집 ···········································································································21
연구도구 ···········································································································22
실험처치 ···········································································································26
자료분석 ···········································································································28
연구결과 ·············································································································29
일반적 특성에 대한 동질성 검증 ··········································································29
종속변수에 대한 동질성 검증 ··············································································31
가설 검증 ··········································································································32
논의 ···················································································································35
결론 및 제언 ·······································································································38
참고문헌 ············································································································39
Abstract ············································································································47
부록1. 연구참여 동의서, 설문지 ···········································································48
부록2. 연구도구 - 인수인계 수행능력 ···································································53
부록3. 시나리오1 ·······························································································54
부록4. 시나리오2 ·······························································································58
부록5. 개념지도 작성 시범 ··················································································64
부록6. 실험군 개념지도 작성 사례 ·······································································65
부록7. 생명윤리심의 결과통지서 ·························································· ··············66
부록8. 도구사용승인 ··························································································67

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0