메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

정선화, Jeong, Seon Hwa (충북대학교, 충북대학교 대학원)

지도교수
서상택
발행연도
2020
저작권
충북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수6

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to provide comparative information that can help to measure efficiency and select appropriate benchmarking targets of inefficient farms by securing homogeneity with the characteristics of farms in efficiency analysis. The farm income data of apple and pear farms obtained from Rural Development Administration(RDA) were analyzed using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) model and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, which are representative methods of efficiency analysis. For the analysis, fertilizer, pesticide, material, labor and fixed costs were selected as input factors. and total income was selected as the output factor. In addition, we divided the farms into several groups with different practice types to secure homogeneity in each crop.
First, the result of the SFA estimation showed that both pear farms and apple farms had technical inefficiency. As for the pear farms, the material cost and labor cost were statistically significant in all groups. Pesticide costs were also found to be significant in some groups with their own practice types. Apple farms had statistically significant material and labor costs. As a result of farmhouse analysis by cultivation type, fixed costs were also significant.
There are differences in efficiency values due to methodological differences between SFA efficiency and DEA efficiency. In both methods, the more efficient the farms were, the more they were classified into varieties and cultivation types.
Although there were differences among the analysis groups, pear and apple farms were caused by Pure Technical Efficiency (PTE) because of the inefficiency of most farms. Result of over-investment and benchmarking of inefficient farms according to DEA analysis results, According to the characteristics of the farmhouse, the more the group analysis, It was clear that over-injection factors that required savings by farms. It can also be seen that the benchmark target reference set and reference rank are different.
Finally, as a result of efficiency analysis by group, a comparison of farm efficiency and ranking showed, how farm efficiency varied. Both pear farms and apple farms showed differences in efficiency as they were segmented based on the homogeneity of analysis group.
The more the farm characteristics are segmented, the higher the farm efficiency. This suggests that farming techniques among homogeneous farms are leveled.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
1.1 연구배경
1.2 연구목적
1.3 선행연구 검토
1.3.1 농가 경영관리에 관한 연구
1.3.2 농가 효율성 분석에 관한 연구
1.3.3 효율성 분석의 변수 선정
Ⅱ.이론적 고찰
2.1 효율성(efficiency)
2.2 효율성 분석 방법
2.3 생산 가능 집합(feasible production set)과 생산 가능 경계(production possibility frontier)
2.4 분석기법
2.4.1 자료포락분석(DEA: Data Envelopment Analysis)
2.4.2 확률변경분석(SFA: Stochastic Frontier Analysis)
2.5 적정 DMU의 수
Ⅲ. 연구방법 및 절차
3.1 DEA 모형을 이용한 효율성 추정
3.2 SFA 모형을 이용한 효율성 추정
Ⅳ. 분석자료
4.1 변수 및 분석자료
4.2 배 표본농가 일반현황
4.3 사과 표본농가 일반현황
Ⅴ. 실증분석
5.1 효율성 분석 결과
5.1.1 DEA에 의한 효율성 추정
5.1.2 SFA에 의한 효율성 추정
5.2 농가 경영효율 방안
5.2.1 효율성 분포 및 비효율성 분석
5.2.2 규모수익분석(return to scale analysis)
5.2.3 비효율농가의 과다투입분
5.2.4 참조집합 및 참조횟수 분석
5.2.5 분석집단 간 농가 효율성 비교
Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0