지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 이정원
- 발행연도
- 2019
- 저작권
- 동의대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수12
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
본 연구는 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치와 직업선택의도에 대해 알아보기 위하여 자가 보고식 설문 조사법을 이용한 서술적 조사 연구이다.
자료수집 기간은 2018년 6월 1일부터 6월 16일까지였다.
본 연구는 부산광역시에 소재하고 있는 4년제 대학교 3곳의 의료경영계열 대학생을 대상으로 조사하였다. 총 148부의 설문지를 배포하여 142부가 회수되었으며, 회수된 설문지 중 응답이 불성실한 설문지 3부를 제외한 총139부의 유효설문지를 통계분석 자료로 이용하였다.
본 연구에서 수집된 자료는 IBM SPSS statistics version 25.0 for windows를 이용하여 분석하였다.
연구의 결과는 다음과 같다.
첫째, 각 변수의 기술통계 분석결과 직업가치의 항목별 평균점수는 지식추구의 평균은 3.376±0.713점, 사회헌신의 평균은 3.577±0.646점, 인간관계 중심의 평균은 4.266±0.524점, 경제우선의 평균은 3.559±0.766점, 체면유지의 평균은 3.488±0.718점, 안정추구의 평균은 4.207±0.675점이었다.
둘째, 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치가 병원 원무·행정직 직업선택의도에 있어 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과 사회헌신(ß=0.554, p<0.001)과 안정추구(ß=0.473, p=0.001)가 병원원무·행정직을 선택하는 데 있어 통계적으로 유의하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.
셋째, 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치가 의무기록사 직업선택의도에 있어 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과 사회헌신(ß=0.349, p=0.010)과 안정추구(ß=0.409, p=0.004)가 의무기록사를 선택하는 데 있어 통계적으로 유의하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.
넷째, 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치가 국제의료관광 코디네이터 직업선택의도에 있어 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과 인간관계 중심(ß=0.632, p<0.001), 체면유지(ß=0.264, p=0.032), 안정추구(ß=-0.193, p=0.049)가 국제의료관광 코디네이터를 선택하는 데 있어 통계적으로 유의하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.
다섯째, 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치가 보건교육사 직업선택의도에 있어 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과사회헌신(ß=0.233, p=0.016)이 보건교육사를 선택하는 데 있어 통계적으로유의하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.
여섯째, 일반적 특성에 따른 직업가치를 비교한 결과, 성별의 경우 지식추구(P=0.046)와 사회헌신(p=0.033)만이 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 학년에 따른 직업가치의 경우 사회헌신(p=0.001), 안정추구(p=0.024)가 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 종교 유·무의차이에 따른 경우 모든 항목이 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 경제적 수준의 경우 경제우선(p=0.020)의 항목을 제외한 모든 항목에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다.
자료수집 기간은 2018년 6월 1일부터 6월 16일까지였다.
본 연구는 부산광역시에 소재하고 있는 4년제 대학교 3곳의 의료경영계열 대학생을 대상으로 조사하였다. 총 148부의 설문지를 배포하여 142부가 회수되었으며, 회수된 설문지 중 응답이 불성실한 설문지 3부를 제외한 총139부의 유효설문지를 통계분석 자료로 이용하였다.
본 연구에서 수집된 자료는 IBM SPSS statistics version 25.0 for windows를 이용하여 분석하였다.
연구의 결과는 다음과 같다.
첫째, 각 변수의 기술통계 분석결과 직업가치의 항목별 평균점수는 지식추구의 평균은 3.376±0.713점, 사회헌신의 평균은 3.577±0.646점, 인간관계 중심의 평균은 4.266±0.524점, 경제우선의 평균은 3.559±0.766점, 체면유지의 평균은 3.488±0.718점, 안정추구의 평균은 4.207±0.675점이었다.
둘째, 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치가 병원 원무·행정직 직업선택의도에 있어 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과 사회헌신(ß=0.554, p<0.001)과 안정추구(ß=0.473, p=0.001)가 병원원무·행정직을 선택하는 데 있어 통계적으로 유의하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.
셋째, 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치가 의무기록사 직업선택의도에 있어 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과 사회헌신(ß=0.349, p=0.010)과 안정추구(ß=0.409, p=0.004)가 의무기록사를 선택하는 데 있어 통계적으로 유의하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.
넷째, 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치가 국제의료관광 코디네이터 직업선택의도에 있어 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과 인간관계 중심(ß=0.632, p<0.001), 체면유지(ß=0.264, p=0.032), 안정추구(ß=-0.193, p=0.049)가 국제의료관광 코디네이터를 선택하는 데 있어 통계적으로 유의하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.
다섯째, 의료경영계열 대학생의 직업가치가 보건교육사 직업선택의도에 있어 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과사회헌신(ß=0.233, p=0.016)이 보건교육사를 선택하는 데 있어 통계적으로유의하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.
여섯째, 일반적 특성에 따른 직업가치를 비교한 결과, 성별의 경우 지식추구(P=0.046)와 사회헌신(p=0.033)만이 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 학년에 따른 직업가치의 경우 사회헌신(p=0.001), 안정추구(p=0.024)가 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 종교 유·무의차이에 따른 경우 모든 항목이 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 경제적 수준의 경우 경제우선(p=0.020)의 항목을 제외한 모든 항목에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다.
목차
I. 서론····························································································································11. 연구의 필요성 ·····································································································12. 연구의 목적·········································································································3II. 이론적배경··············································································································41. 의료서비스와 직업가치·····················································································41) 의료서비스의 특성···························································································42) 직업가치 개념 및 기능···················································································53) 직업가치 구성요소···························································································64) 직업가치 선행연구···························································································82. 직업선택의도·····································································································101) 직업선택의도 개념·························································································102) 직업선택의도 선행연구·················································································113. 직업가치와 직업선택 선행연구 ·····································································12Ⅲ. 연구설계 ···············································································································141. 연구모형과 가설·······························································································141) 연구모형···········································································································142) 연구가설···········································································································152. 자료수집방법·····································································································183. 연구도구·············································································································191) 직업가치···········································································································192) 직업선택의도···································································································194. 측정도구의 신뢰성 검증 ·················································································195. 자료분석방법·····································································································206. 연구의 윤리적 측면·························································································21Ⅳ. 연구결과 ···············································································································221. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성·············································································222. 각 변수의 기술적 통계 분석·········································································233. 직업가치와 직업선택의도···············································································241) 직업가치와 직업선택의도·············································································242) 직업가치와 병원원무?행정직에 대한 직업선택의도·····························253) 직업가치와 의무기록사에 대한 직업선택의도·········································264) 직업가치와 국제의료관광 코디네이터에 대한 직업선택의도···············275) 직업가치와 보건교육사에 대한 직업선택의도·········································284. 일반적 특성에 따른 직업가치·······································································291) 성별에 따른 직업가치···················································································292) 학년에 따른 직업가치···················································································303) 종교에 따른 직업가치···················································································314) 경제적 수준에 따른 직업가치·····································································325. 가설검정결과·····································································································34Ⅴ. 고찰·······················································································································37Ⅵ. 결론·······················································································································421. 결론 ·····················································································································422. 제언 및 연구의 제한점···················································································44참고문헌······················································································································46영문초록설문지
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0