본 연구는 요양병원 간호사를 대상으로 치매간호지식, 치매태도 및 인간중심 돌봄과의 관계를 파악하여 요양병원 간호사의 치매노인을 대상으로 인간중심의 질 높은 돌봄를 제공하기 위한 기초자료로 활용하고자 시도된 서술적 조사연구이다. 2018년 9월 5일부터 9월 21일까지 B광역시 소재 1등급 요양병원에서 근무하는 치매환자를 돌본 경험이 1개월 이상 있는 간호사를 대상으로 구조화된 설문지를 이용하여 자료를 수집하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS/WIN 25.0 프로그램을 이용하여 기술적 통계, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe''s test, Pearson 상관관계로 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 대상자의 치매간호지식의 평균 점수는 11.69점이었다. 치매간호지식은 대상자의 특성 중에서 종교(F=2.23, p=.028), 최종학력(F=3.92, p=.023)에 따라 유의한 차이를 보였다. 2. 대상자의 치매태도의 평균 점수는 4.70점이었다. 치매태도는 대상자의 특성 중에서 성별(F=-2.12, p=.036), 간호관리자 만족도(F=3.51, p=.033), 치매관심정도(F=3.78,p<.001)에 따라 유의한 차이를 보였다. 3. 대상자의 인간중심 돌봄의 평균 점수는 3.34점이었다. 하부영역인 ‘개별화된 돌봄’ 은 3.24점, ‘조직적 및 환경적지지’ 는 3.46점이었다. 인간중심 돌봄은 근무병원 특성 중에서 직원의견 행정실무 반영정도(F=10.74, p<.001), 병원운영진의 병원운영 만족도(F=23.47, p<.001), 행정관리자의 리더십 및 업무처리 만족도(F=13.16, p<.001), 간호 관리자의 리더십 및 업무처리 만족도(F=3.51,p=.033), 임금 만족도(F=12.27, p<.001), 요양병원 임상경력(F=2.14, p=.047)에 따 라 유의한 차이를 보였다. 4. 대상자의 치매간호지식, 치매태도, 인간중심 돌봄과의 상관관계를 분석한결과, 치매태도는 인간중심 돌봄과 양의 상관관계가 있었다(r=.24,p=.011). 반면, 치매간호지식은 치매태도와 인간중심 돌봄과는 유의한 상관관계가 없었다. 이상의 연구결과 치매태도가 인간중심 돌봄과 상관관계가 있다. 따라서 요양병원의 치매환자에 대한 인간중심 돌봄을 위한 간호사의 바람직한 태도형성과 태도 개선을 위한 실무교육과정 개발 및 연구가 필요할 것이다.
This study is a descriptive study carried out subject to nurses in Geriatric hospitals to use as basic data for Geriatric hospital nurses to provide high-quality person-centered care towards to elderly people with dementia by grasping the relationship between knowledge of dementia care, attitude to dementia and person-centered care. Data were collected by using a structured questionnaire subjected to nurses working at a first class Geriatric hospital located in B metropolitan city with more than a month of experience taking care of dementia patients from September 5th to 21st in 2018. Collected data were analyzed based on technical statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe’s test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient by using SPSS/WIN 25.0 program. The results of the study are as follow; 1. The mean score of dementia care knowledge of subjects was 11.69. There was a significant difference on dementia care knowledge according to religion (F=2.23, p=.028), final education level among characteristics of subjects. 2. The mean score of attitude to dementia of subjects was 4.70. There was a significant differences on attitude of dementia according to gender (F=-2.12, p=0.036), satisfaction of nursing manager (F=3.51, p=0.033), degree of interest in dementia (F=3.78, p<0.001). 3. The mean score of person-centered care of subjects was 3.34. The two sub-areas, ‘Individualized nursing’ and Organized and environmental support, were 3.34 and 3.46 respectively. Person-centered care showed a significant difference according to reflection degree of employee’s opinion on administrative business (F=10.74, p<0.001), level of satisfaction on Hospital operation of Hospital management (F=23.47, p<0.001), level of satisfaction on leadership and business handling of administrator (F=13.16, v<0.001), level of satisfaction on leadership and business handling of nursing manager (F=3.51, p<0.033), wage satisfaction level (F=12.27, p<0.001), Geriatric hospital clinical history (F=2.14, p<0.047) among ‘Working hospital characteristics’. 4. As a result of analyzing correlation of subjects’ dementia care knowledge, attitude to dementia and person-centered care that the ‘attitude to dementia’ has a positive correlation with person-centered care (r=0.24, p<0.011) of person-centered care. On the other hand, dementia care knowledge does not have any correlation with attitude to dementia and person-centered care. According to above findings, there is a correlation between ‘attitude to dementia’ and person-centered care. Therefore, on the job training course development and research are needed for the development and the improvement of attitude of nurses for person-centered care on dementia patients of Geriatric hospital.
목차
국문초록 ······························……………………………………………ⅰI. 서론 ·············································································11. 연구의 필요성 ············……………………………………………······12. 연구의 목적 ·············……………………··………………………······33. 용어정의 ············……………………………………··……………······3Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 ·························………··…………………………………·51. 인간중심 돌봄 ··········………………………………………·············52. 치매간호지식과 치매태도 ·············…………………………………··7Ⅲ. 연구 방법 ······················……………………………………………·101. 연구 설계 ················………………………………………………···102. 연구 대상 ·····················…………………………………………···103. 연구 도구 ·····················…………………………………………··114. 자료 수집 절차와 연구윤리 ·············………………………………·125. 자료 분석 ·····················…………………………………………···13Ⅳ. 연구 결과 ······················……………………………………………141. 대상자의 특성 ·····················………………………………………142. 치매간호지식 정도 ································………………………203. 치매태도 정도 ································……………………………224. 인간중심 돌봄 정도 ···················…………………………………245. 대상자 특성에 따른 치매간호지식, 태도 및 인간중심 돌봄 정도의 차이 ·266. 대상자의 치매간호지식, 태도 및 인간중심 돌봄과의 관계 ·········32Ⅴ. 논 의 ························……………………………·····………………33Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 ·······································……………···………381. 결론 ···········…………………………………………………………382. 제언 ···········…………………………………………………………39참고문헌 ·····················……………………………………………………40부록 ······················…………………………………………………………48영문초록 ·····················……………………………………………………55