This paper analyzed the origins of North Korean nuclear policy through the concept of ''Nuclear potential strategy''. Previous studies have remained in the phenomenal analysis that in 1962 North Korea suddenly switched to strengthening its military force in order to respond to the changes in international situation. This paper sought to clarify that North Korea''s nuclear policy is not a fragmentary policy pursuing only nuclear weapons or nuclear energy, but a strategy for securing nuclear potential. The strategy of securing the nuclear potential is based on the hypothesis that any country can strategically devote its nuclear policy to the military at any time. Countries pursuing nuclear development strategies will continue to pursue advanced nuclear technologies that can achieve both economic and military objectives. The results of the analysis on North Korean nuclear policy are as follows. First, North Korea''s nuclear policy was promoted for economic and military dual purposes by analyzing the policies and development process of nuclear energy in 1950'' s. Nuclear policy in the 1950s was a policy of peaceful use of nuclear energy, and North Korea pursued nuclear policy as a socialist industrialized nation, that is, economic growth strategy. The second is the analysis result of the change of the international environment in the 1960s, the policy decision factors, the response strategy of Kim Il Sung, and the changes of nuclear policy. North Korea has been pursuing a strategy to combine peaceful use of nuclear energy and military use by 1966 and 1966. Then, in 1967, Nuclear Military Exclusivity to the full-scale. The decisive factors are the US-China Cold War system, the Northeast Asian regional system in which the Korea-US-Japan Triangular Military Alliance and the North Korea-China-the Soviet Union Triangular Military Alliances collide, the nuclear threat of the United States, Small conflicts, the emergence of Park Chung-hee''s military, and changes in international affairs, such as the Vietnam War and the nuclear development of China. Third, it is the analysis result of the correlation between the translation line and the nuclear policy. The translation route was Kim Il Sung''s national strategy to secure ''deterrence of war''. In 1966, the "strengthening of the defense force" was a transition of nuclear policy in a practical sense. The ''Defense Construction'' route can be said to be the transfer of nuclear power to the military. In other words, the translating route was a secret military-only policy that was pursued by the secret police. The translational route was adopted internally and secretly in 1962. This period was promoted from 1962 to 1966 with the aim of ‘Economy Construction’ at the first stage. During that time, North Korea, with its ambition for the "nuclear energy revolution", focused on securing nuclear technology centered on the nuclear power industry. The second - stage translation line has been in full swing since 1967 with the aim of constructing a national defense. ''Defense construction'' was a long-term nuclear development strategy based on nuclear policy. The approach was to replicate nuclear and missile technology and to secure nuclear deterrence. Fourth, the results of analysis of the contents of the continuation and change of nuclear policy in 1950 ~ 1960s. The translating route was a strategy of securing the nuclear potential that dreams of ''nuclear future'' and ''nuclear energy revolution'' at the same time. Nuclear Potential Strategy is a strategy to reinforce nuclear technology until it establishes a nuclear power system that is militarily meaningful in nuclear technology acquired through the peaceful use policy of nuclear energy. From 1957 to 1966, North Korea pursued the ''10-year plan for science development''. As a result, it has acquired a rudimentary nuclear technology. The 10-year plan for science development is a science and technology development strategy implemented since 1957. It is noteworthy that at the end of the 10-year plan of science development, in 1966, North Korea formulated the translation line as a strategic route. This suggests that the ''10-year plan for science development'' was a policy to pursue ''Nuclear potential strategy''. On the other hand, it demonstrates that North Korea has made ''defense construction'' in earnest based on the achievements of nuclear science and technology accumulated over 10 years. Therefore, the strategy of securing the potential of nuclear weapons is an important keyword that clarifies the correlation between the translation route and the nuclear policy. The strategy for securing the nuclear potential was tied to the "Declaration of Completion of Nuclear Armed Forces" on November 29, 2017, 50 years after the ''Defense Construction'' in 1967. Although peaceful use of nuclear energy has been reserved for 50 years, ''defense construction'' has yielded a successful outcome of nuclear deterrence. In interpreting the translational route in terms of securing the potential for nuclear weapons, the declaration of the completion of nuclear armed forces on November 29, 2017 achieved the "defense construction". At the same time, we have reached a condition where we can switch to a peaceful utilization strategy of nuclear energy, which is another part of our strategy to secure our nuclear potential. This means that North Korea''s nuclear policy will return to its peaceful use of nuclear energy in 50 years after its transition to a nuclear development strategy in 1967. Kim Il-sung has pursued a strategy to secure nuclear potential under weak conditions of nuclear technology and as a ''long-term idea for the future''. On the other hand, Kim Jung-eun is a qualitatively different condition that secures the deterrence of the US and the high level of nuclear technology. In addition, it is the stage of consolidation of the national strategy of 60 years or the realization phase. Kim Jung Eun''s ''New Era Industrial Revolution'' is bound to translating routes. The ''New Era Industrial Revolution'' is an economic revolution strategy through nuclear energy. As North Korea expresses, it is ''the completion of the economic construction and nuclear armed construction transfer line''. The ''New Era Industrial Revolution'' declared by Kim Jong Eun is to open the era of commercialization of nuclear energy, the era of nuclear energy revolution that Kim Il Sung dreamed of in the 1950s. Kim Jong Eun''s "Economy and Nuclear Translation line" confirms that Kim Il-sung''s translational route was a strategic route for implementing the nuclear potential strategy. This is supported by the dual logic of the economy and defense, the realization of defense construction completed by building a nuclear power system, and the declaration of commercialization of nuclear energy.
제1장 서론 11절 연구목적 12절 선행연구 검토 83절 연구범위 및 방법 12제2장 핵의 이중성과 핵 잠재력 확보전략 151절 핵의 이중성과 핵전략 개념의 재구성 151. 핵의 이중성: 핵에너지와 핵무기 152. 인도의 이중 핵전략 사례: 경제군사 병행전략 173. 북한의 이중 핵전략 사례: 김정은 시대 경제핵병진노선 202절 원자력의 평화적 이용전략과 핵 잠재력 확보전략 개념의 재구성 271. 원자력의 평화적 이용전략: 평화적 핵확산과 군사적 핵 비확산 272. 북한의 핵 잠재력 확보전략: 평화적 이용과 군사적 전용(轉用) 32제3장 1950~1960년대 국제정세 변화와 핵 잠재력 확보전략 371절 1950~1960년대 동북아 지역 정세 변화 결정요인 371. 동북아 지역 정세 변화 요인 371) 중소 갈등 372) 베트남 전쟁 463) 중국의 핵개발 532. 박정희 군사정권의 등장과 김일성의 대응전략 621) 박정희 군사정권의 등장 622) 김일성의 정세인식 변화와 대응전략 662절 핵 잠재력 확보전략의 결정요인 701. 경제적 측면 701) 원자력의 평화적 이용에 대한 김일성의 낙관적 인식 702) 소련의 원자력의 평화적 이용전략으로의 편승 752. 군사적 측면 831) 김일성의 대미(對美) 핵위협인식 832) 핵 기술력 확보와 군사적 전용(轉用) 모색 87제4장 1950~1960년대 북한의 경제계획과 핵정책의 상관성 931절 1950년대 북한의 경제계획과 핵정책의 상관성 931. 북한의 대소(對蘇) 편승전략과 소련의 핵기술 지원 931) 북한의 대소(對蘇) 편승전략 932) 1950년대 조소 핵기술협력 952. 1950년대 북한의 5개년 경제계획과 핵정책의 상관성 1101) 1950년대 북한의 핵정책의 의미와 전개과정 1102) 1950년대 5개년 경제계획과 원자력의 평화적 이용정책 1172절 1960년대 북한의 핵정책과 병진노선의 상관성 1331. 1960년대 북한의 7개년 경제계획과 핵정책의 상관성 1331) 1960년대 조소핵미사일 기술협력 1332) 1960년대 7개년 경제계획과 원자력의 평화적 이용정책 1392. 1960년대 경제건설국방건설 병진노선과 핵정책의 상관성 1501) 1962년 병진노선 비공식 채택의 의미와 전개과정 1502) 1966년 병진노선 공식 채택의 의미와 핵정책의 상관성 158제5장 1960년대 원자력의 군사적 전용과 핵정책의 지속과 변화 1711절 1960년대 원자력의 군사적 전용 정책의 전개와 특징 1711. 국방건설의 결정요인과 원자력의 군사적 전용의 의미 1711) 병진노선의 국방건설 계획의 결정요인 1712) 국방건설 과 군사적 전용의 상관성 1832. 원자력 군사적 전용의 전개과정 1871) 북한의 복제적 핵미사일 기술과 핵정책 1872) 중소 군사지원 1952절 북한 핵정책의 지속과 변화 1991. 1950~1960년대 핵정책의 특징 1991) 1950년대 핵정책의 특징: 핵기술도입 및 핵 인프라 구축기 1992) 1960년대 핵정책의 특징: 핵미사일 복제기술 실험기 2012. 1950~1960년대 핵정책의 지속과 변화 2031) 지속성 측면: 계획경제 차원의 핵정책 추진 2032) 변화의 측면: 핵 경제정책에서 핵 군사정책으로의 전환 207제6장 결론 212<참고문헌> 217ABSTRACT 249