메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

염혜리 (서울여자대학교, 서울여자대학교 일반대학원)

지도교수
주신하
발행연도
2017
저작권
서울여자대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수12

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
If the gardens were a space centered on contemplation in the past, nowadays the functions of the garden have been diversified as a space for relaxation, healing and communication and people''s interest is increasing. The social awareness of the Garden Expo increased from the Suncheon Bay International Garden Expo in 2013. Starting from Gyeonggi Garden Culture Expo in 2010, various garden exhibitions are held like Seoul Garden Show, Korea Garden Show, Suncheon Hanpyeong Garden Festival, and living garden in Arboretum. As a result, the social interest in the garden has increased, and many people
are now volunteering in garden activities and willing to take citizien gardener course. There is also a tendency to create and specialize a garden within an apartment. As many fairs have been held, many garden entries have appeared. Although many studies have been conducted on the International Garden of Suncheon Bay in 2013, the research on the tendency through the analysis of the status of the other fairs is insufficient. Therefore, this study has done research on analysis of garden shows in korea from 2014 to 2016 looking forward for the tendency of the new gardens. This study’s purpose is firstly, analyzing detail of the garden through classification for the growth of the garden culture. Secondly, finding trends by analyzing current status of garden shows in korea. Lastly, suggesting basic information by analyzing garden expo for future garden expo and activation of the garden. To accomplish this, data were collected according to three types of analysis frameworks: facilities, plants, and style types of garden entries through literature review and field survey on existing garden and garden fairs. After analyzing the planting materials, facilities and analyzing the style types of the entries, In order to supplement the subjective interpretation of the results, the garden designers interview was conducted.
Overall, in the case of introduction facilities, sculptures, resting facilities, and space division type facilities were introduced the most in the last three years.
For the planting, maple trees were introduced, maple trees, pine trees and birch trees. The shrubs were mostly used as the boundary using winged spinndle, boxwood, and Namcheon. The harbaceous ornamentals were mostly Korean chrysanthemum, flame grass, Gaura, Maple-leaf mukdenia, hostas. It is considered that the characteristics of the garden facilities according to the exposition are used differentially in accordance with the theme and characteristics of the exposition. Korea Garden Show 2016 ‘s theme was ''K-garden'', and Seoul Garden Show 2015’s theme was ''Where is the garden? It is a garden that lives in Seoul. These two exhibitions’ entries used much of traditional sculpture because the theme was not a daily life, but rather a traditional related theme. The characteristics of the introduced planting material were not different depending on the theme and characteristics, although the difference of the planting species by spring or autumn was observed. Although introducing the subject that shows the traditionality as the introduction facilities, the introduction of the horticultural species, which is currently popular, has
become more prominent than the use of the native species.
This is the result of comparative analysis between Suncheon Hanpyeong Garden Festival and Seoul holding fairs. And this can be explained by the formation of Suncheon ''s regional base market and the activity area of the artist.
The tendency of the overall exhibition is that the theme is held every year as a theme related to ''everyday life'' that can be familiarized to the general public, so resting facilities in the garden facilities part has been increased and many living garden style gardens are exhibiting.
In addition, the use of grasses, which were popular overseas, began to be used variously starting from 2015.
The most diverse species were introduced by year 2015 according to the characteristics of each exhibition. This is because the arboretum workers exhibited by themselves of by collaborating with the garden designers in the year.
Finally, by analyzing by classification of the garden styles, it is confirmed that the style is simplified to "living garden style" as the current year is repeated. As such, it is considered that domestic garden fairs need to develop
separate garden related events by separating themes or inducing good competition through the characterization of local cities like foreign garden shows do.
This study has the significance as the garden historical data which can read the flow of domestic garden expo entries. And it is a research of using quantitative method on classification of garden style of 97 entries from 2014 to
2016. Lastly, by analyzing the current status of the garden facilities and planting by style types, it is meaningful to provide basic garden vocabulary which can be easily accessed from the viewpoint of the garden users.

목차

1. 서론 1
1.1 연구배경 및 목적 1
1.2 연구내용 2
2. 연구사 5
2.1. 정원박람회 선행 연구 5
2.2. 인접분야 관련연구 7
3. 이론적 고찰 11
3.1. 정원박람회 11
3.1.1. 정원박람회의 개념 및 역사 11
3.1.2. 박람회 유형 구분 12
3.2. 해외박람회 13
4. 연구범위 및 연구방법 18
4.1. 연구범위 18
4.1.1. 시간적 범위 18
4.1.2. 공간적 범위 18
4.2. 연구방법 19
5. 연구결과 22
5.1. 정원 도입 요소 분석 22
5.1.1. 도입 시설물 분석 22
5.1.2. 도입 식재 식물 분석 23
1) 교목 23
2) 관목 24
3) 초화류 25
5.2. 박람회별 출품작 특성 분석 25
5.2.1. 코리아가든쇼 26
1) 제1회 코리아가든쇼 (2014년) 26
2) 제2회 코리아가든쇼 (2015년) 28
3) 제3회 코리아가든쇼 (2016년) 31
5.2.2 서울정원박람회 33
1) 제1회 서울정원박람회 (2015년) 33
2) 제2회 서울정원박람회 (2016년) 35
5.2.3 경기정원문화박람회 37
1) 제3회 경기정원문화박람회 (2015년) 37
2) 제4회 경기정원문화박람회 (2016년) 39
5.2.4 제3회 순천 한평정원 페스티벌 (2016년) 41
5.2.5 박람회별 특성 분석 44
1) 박람회별 도입 시설물 분석 44
2) 박람회별 도입 식재 식물 분석 46
5.3. 정원스타일별 출품작 특성 분석 51
5.3.1. 최근 3년간 정원스타일 분포 현황 분석 52
5.3.2. 연도별 정원스타일 분포 현황 분석 53
5.3.3. 박람회별 정원스타일 분포 현황 분석 54
5.4. 정원스타일별 세부요소 분석 57
5.4.1. 아티션스타일 57
5.4.2. 모던스타일 59
5.4.3. 미니멀스타일 61
5.4.4. 한국적스타일 63
5.4.5. 리빙가든스타일 65
5.4.6. 캐주얼스타일 67
5.5. 소결 69
6. 결론 72
6.1 요약 및 고찰 72
6.2 연구의의 및 한계 76
참고문헌 77
부록 81
1. 정원스타일별 종합 자료 81
2. 전체 출품작 정보 87
3. 시설물 유형 구분 117
4. 작가인터뷰 121
Abstract 138

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0