지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 탁양주
- 발행연도
- 2017
- 저작권
- 한국교통대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수1
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives : A bag squeezing technique is commonly used in cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR). However, conventional bag squeezing technique is not specified and emergency medical providers can not maintain correct tidal volume. The aim of this study was to compare the tidal volume of two different bag squeezing techniques in endotracheal intubation settings.
Methods : A total of 38 emergency medical technician(EMT) students who are confident of airway management techniques participated in this study. We measured tidal volume of two different bag squeezing techniques. One is conventional bag squeezing technique(CBT) according to 2015 AHA guideline and another is finger-marked bag squeezing technique(FBT) which marked finger position on the surface of ambu-bag in an intubated manikin. For the FBT, the bag is squeezed until the thumb and the middle finger touch. Subject’s characteristics such as hand size, grip strength were measured and the data were analyzed statistically.
Results : The mean tidal volumes provided by the FBT was significantly higher than that provided by the CBT(542.6±35.9ml vs 338.0±111.1ml, p<0.001). There was a correlation between the two types of bag squeezing techniques(Pearson x2=1.160, p<0.001) and the subject’s characteristics including gender, hand size, grip strength showed no correlation with volume.
Conclusion : Finger-marked bag squeezing technique can provides adequate and correct tidal volume during artificial ventilation.
Methods : A total of 38 emergency medical technician(EMT) students who are confident of airway management techniques participated in this study. We measured tidal volume of two different bag squeezing techniques. One is conventional bag squeezing technique(CBT) according to 2015 AHA guideline and another is finger-marked bag squeezing technique(FBT) which marked finger position on the surface of ambu-bag in an intubated manikin. For the FBT, the bag is squeezed until the thumb and the middle finger touch. Subject’s characteristics such as hand size, grip strength were measured and the data were analyzed statistically.
Results : The mean tidal volumes provided by the FBT was significantly higher than that provided by the CBT(542.6±35.9ml vs 338.0±111.1ml, p<0.001). There was a correlation between the two types of bag squeezing techniques(Pearson x2=1.160, p<0.001) and the subject’s characteristics including gender, hand size, grip strength showed no correlation with volume.
Conclusion : Finger-marked bag squeezing technique can provides adequate and correct tidal volume during artificial ventilation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론 11. 연구의 필요성 12. 연구의 목적 8Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 91. 인공호흡 92. 압착 백을 이용한 인공호흡 13Ⅲ. 연구방법 181. 연구 설계 182. 연구 대상 183. 연구 도구 194. 자료 수집 225. 자료 분석 236. 용어의 정의 24Ⅳ. 연구 결과 271. 대상자의 일반적 특성 272. 백 압착법에 따른 일회호흡량의 차이 283. 적절/부적절 일회호흡량 제공율 비교 284. 일회호흡량의 산점도 비교 295. 압착법과 횟수에 따른 일회호흡량 비교 306. 일회호흡량에 영향을 미치는 요인 31Ⅴ. 고찰 32Ⅵ. 결론 35참고문헌 36Abstract 41부 록 43
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0