지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수19
목 차요 약 iLIST OF TABLES viLIST OF FIGURES viii1. 서 론 11-1. 연구배경 및 문헌연구 12. 연구지역 및 방법 112-1. 연구지역 112-1-1. 인공함양 시범지역 112-1-2. 토양시료 채취지역 122-2. 토양 용출실험 132-2-1. 실험방법 132-3. 시료 전처리 142-4. 성분분석 152-4-1. 이온분석 152-4-2. 용존유기탄소량(DOC) 분석 172-5. 분광분석 182-5-1. 자외선흡광도(UV absorbance) 분석 182-5-2. 고유흡광도(SUVA) 분석 192-5-3. 형광 3차원 여기-방출 맵핑(3D-EEM) 분석 202-6. 평균분자량분석 222-6-1. 겔 크로마토그래피(GPC) 분석 222-7. 다변량통계(PARAFAC) 분석 253. 결과 및 토의 283-1. 지하수 및 지표수 수리지화학적 특성 283-2. 지하수 및 지표수 용존유기물 화학구조적 특성 373-2-1. 용존유기탄소량(DOC) 373-2-2. 자외선흡광도(UV absorbance) 403-2-3. 고유흡광도(SUVA) 423-2-4. DOC 및 SUVA 상관관계 453-3. 지하수 및 지표수 용존유기물 기원 유추 463-3-1. 형광지표(Fluorescence Index) 463-3-2. 휴믹화지수(Humification Index) 483-3-3. 생물학적지수(Biological Index) 503-4. 지하수 및 지표수 용존유기물 유형 분류 523-4-1. 형광 3차원 여기-방출 맵핑(3D-EEM) 523-4-2. Synchronous 형광스펙트럼 563-4-3. 다변량통계(PARAFAC) 분석 583-5. 양수시험에 따른 용존유기물 특성 변동 603-5-1. 지하수-지표수 모니터링 603-5-2. 지하수-지하수 모니터링 623-5-3. 회복시험에 따른 단백질계물질 변동 특성 633-6. 토양 용출에 따른 용존유기물 특성 변동 643-6-1. 용출 방법별 용출 이온 변화 643-6-2. 염효과에 따른 토양 용출액 화학구조적 특성 683-6-3. 산효과에 따른 토양 용출액 화학구조적 특성 703-6-4. 용출 방법별 평균분자량 분포 특성 743-6-5. 용출 방법별 3D-EEM 변화 양상 804. 결론 88참고문헌 92LIST OF TABLESTable PageTable 1. Natural organic matter fraction and chemical groups 3Table 2. Acidic groups of humic-like substances present in secondary effluents 5Table 3. DOM types by fluorescence 3D excitation-emission wavelength 10Table 4. Aquatic system of study area 11Table 5. Soil sample names by rock type 12Table 6. ICP-OES analysis conditions 15Table 7. IC analysis conditions 16Table 8. Alkalinity analysis conditions 16Table 9. TOC analysis conditions 17Table 10. 3D-EEM analysis conditions 21Table 11. GPC analysis conditions 23Table 12. Fluorescence indices(1) 26Table 13. Fluorescence indices(2) 27Table 14. Water quality measurement of study field (08/2015) 31Table 15. Water quality measurement of study field (11/2015) 31Table 16. Results of major ion and trace element (08/2015) 34Table 17. Results of major ion and trace element (11/2015) 35Table 18. DOC results of study area 38Table 19. DOC and absorbance results of study area (11/2015) 43Table 20. Results of fluorescence index 46Table 21. Results of humification index 48Table 22. Results of biological index 50Table 23. pH and EC by 4 type extraction methods 65Table 24. Extractable heavy metal concentration of WEOM 66Table 25. Extractable heavy metal concentration of SEOM 66Table 26. Extractable heavy metal concentration of AEOM-1 67Table 27. Extractable heavy metal concentration of AEOM-2 67Table 28. DOC and SUVA by 4 type extraction methods 71Table 29. AMW and PDI of WEOM 77Table 30. AMW and PDI of AEOM-1 78LIST OF FIGURESFigure PageFig. 1. Hypothetical structures of common aquatic fluorophores 2Fig. 2. Influence of pH on the removal of fulvic-like acid and humic-like acid 5Fig. 3. 3D-EEM reference peaks 8Fig. 4. GPC calibration 24Fig. 5. Principle of PARAFAC 25Fig. 6. Box plots of water quality measurement of study area 30Fig. 7. Piper diagram by water quality types of study area 36Fig. 8. DOC of groundwater and surfacewater 38Fig. 9. DOC comparison of aquatic system by seasons 39Fig. 10. Results of UV254nm absorbance (11/2015) 41Fig. 11. Results of UV254nm absorbance by water type 41Fig. 12. Results of SUVA (11/2015) 42Fig. 13. Results of SUVA by water type 43Fig. 14. Ratio of UV254nm absorbance/DOC by water type 44Fig. 15. Comparison between DOC/UV254nm absorbance and DOC/SUVA 45Fig. 16. Fluorescence spectrums of study area 47Fig. 17. Correlation of FI and HIX 49Fig. 18. Correlation of BIX and HIX 51Fig. 19. Results of 3D-EEMs (11/2015) 55Fig. 20. Results of synchronous fluorescence spectrum 57Fig. 21. Results of PARAFAC 59Fig. 22. 3D-EEMs change of SPW-1 and IK2 by pumping test 61Fig. 23. 3D-EEMs change of SPW-2 and IK5 by pumping test 62Fig. 24. 3D-EEMs change of protein-like substances by recharge test 63Fig. 25. Results of DOC by 4 type extraction methods 72Fig. 26. Results of SUVA by 4 type extraction methods 72Fig. 27. Correlation between DOC and SUVA 73Fig. 28. GPC results of WEOM 75Fig. 29. GPC results of AEOM-1 76Fig. 30. Comparison between Mn and Mw (WEOM) 77Fig. 31. Comparison between Mn and Mw (AEOM-1) 78Fig. 32. Comparison between PDI (WEOM and AEOM-1) 79Fig. 33. Humic-like substances group 3D-EEMs of WEOM 83Fig. 34. Protein-like substances group 3D-EEMs of WEOM 83Fig. 35. Humic-like substances group 3D-EEMs of SEOM 84Fig. 36. Protein-like substances group 3D-EEMs of SEOM 84Fig. 37. Humic-like substances group 3D-EEMs of AEOM-1 85Fig. 38. Protein-like substances group 3D-EEMs of AEOM-1 85Fig. 39. Humic-like substances group 3D-EEMs of AEOM-2 86Fig. 40. Protein-like substances group 3D-EEMs of AEOM-2 86Fig. 41. Results of synchronous fluorescence spectrum (Δ=30nm) 87
0