메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김동욱 (부산대학교, 부산대학교 대학원)

지도교수
조흥국
발행연도
2016
저작권
부산대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수3

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
(A) Study of Korea Social Enterprise ODA Model in International Development Cooperation

Kim Dong Uk

Major of International and Area Studies
The Graduate School of International Studies
Pusan National University

Abstract

This study focuses on developing Korean social enterprise ODA model by analyzing advanced donor countries’ social enterprise models and Korean social enterprise ODA projects initiated in 2015.
The reason why international society pays attention to social enterprise is because when using market-based approaches to address social issues in developing country, although the region has insufficient public and private fund support, it helps vulnerable social groups to enhance their will by themselves. So it is expected to contribute in order to ensure their future sustainability. Thus, policy makers in developing countries as well as international development experts take notice of social enterprise as a comprehensive economic development method, which consequently achieves poverty reduction and ensures decent work standards.
However, one of the main obstacles to the spread of social enterprise is that although a modern movement for social enterprise appears to be developing simultaneously in many places around the world, important regional differences result in variance in understanding of what the term means, and how it is supported and developed. Thus, by collecting the concepts from preceding research, the paper suggests that the definition of social enterprise in International Development Cooperation(IDC) is ‘an economically sustainable organization which produces social· environmental impact in recipient country or for the people of recipient country.’
Based on this understanding, the paper discussed the way to develop the ‘Korean Social Enterprise ODA Model.’ In fact, several public institutions initiated some projects related to social enterprise since 2014. Compared to the models of advanced donor countries such as Development Innovation Ventures(DIV), Business Innovation Facilitate(BIF) and Innovations Against Poverty(IAP), however, the projects do not introduce the characteristics of Korean social enterprise and do not consider the trend of IDC actively. Therefore, the paper suggests 6 steps to develop the ‘Korean Social Enterprise ODA Model’under 3 condition. First, as Korean social enterprise developed through a top to bottom discourse, the model should be a policy transfer model. Second, considering the trend of IDC, the people of the recipient country should be the main agent. Third, the model should reflect the results of strategies for advancing Korean IDC, the ‘Korean ODA Model’, and ‘Country Partnership Strategy(CPS).’
Meanwhile, the study has two limitations. First, although there were similar projects in the past, the paper considered social enterprise ODA projects as projects which include ‘social enterprise’ in the name. Second, considering that Korean social enterprise ODA projects started in 2015, it was hard to do a case analysis. Therefore, in future research, a broad approach of social enterprise ODA and analyzation of current Korean social enterprise projects are needed.

목차

< 목 차 >
약어표 ⅲ
표 목차 ⅵ
그림 목차 ⅶ
Ⅰ. 서 론 1
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
2. 연구의 필요성 및 선행연구 검토 3
3. 연구 구성 4
Ⅱ. 사회적기업의 이해 6
1. 사회적기업의 개념 5
2. 사회적기업의 등장배경 11
3. 사회적기업의 관련 개념들 15
Ⅲ. 국제개발협력과 사회적기업 19
1. 국제개발협력의 동향 19
2. 국제개발협력에서 사회적기업의 대두 배경 23
3. 국제개발협력에서 사회적기업의 개념 28
Ⅵ. 국제개발협력에서 사회적기업의 시대적 발달과정 35
1. 1990년대 35
2. 2000년대 37
3. 2010년대 39
Ⅴ, 한국형 사회적기업 ODA 모델에 관한 논의 44
1. 한국의 사회적기업 ODA 현황 44
1) 국제개발형 사회적기업 지원 및 발굴 사업 45
2) 해외 사회적기업 창업 및 지원 사업 46
3) 대학의 국제개발협력 참여 사업 47
2. 한국형 사회적기업 ODA 모델 논의 49
3. 한국형 사회적기업 ODA 모델 수립 방안 57
1) 사업대상국 선정 57
2) 거버넌스 전이 58
3) 사회적기업가정신 확산 61
4) 사업주체 선정 63
5) 사회적기업 육성교육 65
6) 사회적기업 설립 및 지원 67
7) 사업 평가 68
Ⅵ. 결론 71
참고문헌 75
첨부 83
Abstract 106

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0