It was unimaginable for Korea to catch up with technical level of materials and parts industry in Japan even 20 years ago. With the gradually increased trade between the two countries after the normalization of diplomatic relations between Korea and Japan in 1956, Korea had posted a slowly increasing trade deficit for the materials and parts industry. After the diplomatic relations between Korea and China were normalized in 1992, the trade deficit with Japan for materials and parts industry had rapidly increased leading to deficit of $12.4 billion in 1996 and $24.3 billion in 2010. While the trade deficit with Japan for materials and parts industry ballooned dangerously, materials and parts industry of Korea was compared to cormorant. Profit earned by selling complete unit to China was spent to import core parts from Japan, and it is analogous to that when a cormorant has caught a fish in its throat, the fisherman has the bird spit the fish up. Meanwhile, Korea''s trade deficit in the area of manufacturing industry with Japan has been Achilles'' heel. Furthermore, it was even believed that Korea would never be able to keep up with materials and parts industry of Japan. In 2011, Korea posted the first decrease of trade deficit with Japan for materials and parts industry from $24.3 billion in 2010 to $22.8 billion. Trade deficit had been decreased for two consecutive years, $22.2 billion in 2012, $20.5 billion in 2013 and $16.3 billion in 2014. Furthermore, decrease in the trade deficit to $14.0 billion in 2015 is being predicted. As the trade deficit with Japan stays constant around $15.0 billion and the trade surplus of $100.0 billion was achieved in 2014, trade between Korea and Japan is not compared to cormorant anymore, and materials and parts industry in Korea is emerging as a promising business for the next generation. Structural changes in trade from 1996 to 2013 were investigated and multiple regression analysis were conducted in order to figure out the reasons for the improved balance of trade that Korea showed with Japan in the field of parts and material industry during that period. By doing so, research about whether the balance of trade was affected by the structural changes or it was a temporary phenomenon was achieved. In the analysis, the balance of Intra-industry trade was used as a dependent variable. Also, seven independent variables were selected; the average of the gross domestic product (GDP) between Korea and Japan, the investment in research and development (R&D) that two countries made, the investment in production facilities that they made, foreign direct investment in Korea, Korea''s outward direct investment, exchange rate changes between two countries, and dummy variables for the policy evaluation. From 1996 to 2013, Korea gradually developed parts and material industry whereas the industry in Japan shrank significantly after the peak in 2011. It means that considerably declined parts and material industry in Japan led to the reduction in the balance of trade deficit, rather than excellent performance of Korea in that field. According to the results of the analysis on the balance of intra-industry trade, the intra-industry generally increased, the vertical intra-industry of high quality products significantly increased, the intra-industry of low quality products also grew a little. However, the horizontal intra-industry rather decreased. According to the result of the multiple regression analysis, investment in R&D, exchange rate changes, foreign direct investment in Korea and Korea''s outward direct investment showed positive relationships. However, GDP turned out to have a negative relationship unexpectedly. In addition, the investment in production facilities was not deemed statistically significant. The implication of this research is that, in order to reduce the trade deficit in parts and material industry with Japan, Korea should not only expand investment in R&D with a long-term plan but also cope with variation of exchange rate in this low yen era. Moreover, special efforts should be made to develop advanced materials so as to attract more foreign direct investment in Korea.
제1장 서 론 1제1절 연구의 필요성과 목적 11. 연구의 필요성 12. 연구의 목적 3제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 41. 연구의 대상 및 범위 42. 연구의 방법 9제2장 소재부품산업에 관한 이론적 배경 11제1절 소재부품산업과 정부의 역할 111. 소재부품산업의 개념 112. 소재부품산업의 특성과 중요성 123. 소재부품산업의 정부개입방식 16제2절 소재부품산업 정책의 역사적 전개과정 211. 소재부품산업 정책의 의의 212. 특별법 제정 이전 223. 특별법 제정 이후 234. 소재부품 관련예산 추이 26제3절 국가간 소재부품산업 분업관계 변동요인 281. 분업관계 변동의 의의 282. 분업관계 변동의 유형 293. 분업관계 변동요인 36제4절 소재부품산업의 선행연구의 검토 371. 한·일간 무역구조에 관한 선행연구 372. 한·일간 분업관계에 관한 선행연구 423. 선행연구와의 차이점 48제5절 연구의 분석틀 491. 기본모형 492. 종속변수 523. 독립변수 58제3장 한·일간 소재부품산업의 무역구조 변화에 관한 분석 61제1절 우리나라 소재부품산업의 무역구조 611. 소재부품산업의 일반현황 612. 소재부품산업의 수출입 현황 및 추이 643. 지역별 수출입 추이와 구조적 특징 88제2절 일본 소재부품산업의 무역구조 941. 소재부품산업의 일반현황 942. 소재부품산업의 수출입 현황 및 추이 973. 지역별 수출입 추이와 구조적 특징 120제3절 한·일간 소재부품산업의 무역구조 변화 비교분석 126제4장 한국 소재부품산업의 분업관계 변동요인에 관한 분석 133제1절 모형의 타당성 검증 1331. 분석방법 1332. 모형의 타당성 검증 135제2절 기술통계 분석 1371. 종속변수 기술통계 분석 1372. 품목수 기준 산업내무역지수 분석 1433. 독립변수 기술통계 분석 151제3절 한국 소재부품산업의 분업관계 변동요인 분석 1611. 통합분석 결과 1612. 대분류 기준 분석 1623. 중분류 기준 분석 168제5장 결론 175제1절 연구결과의 요약 175제2절 연구결과의 정책적 시사점 178참고문헌 181Abstract 187부표 190