By increasing contact and exchanges with foreigners in Korea, we can not deny the augmentation of accommodation between them. However, it is difficult to make sure that means move toward inclusion of acceptance and integrity. Because it shows that Koreans have ambivalent attitude of inclusion and exclusion to foreigners’ accommodation.
In this project, I’ve studied on international marriages, foreign students, and specified multicultural district with comparative approaches to see the possibilities of inclusive development and exclusive regression toward Korea’s multicultural society.
This study, to show the coordinates of multiculturality in Korean society, presents the following conclusions: the first, the multiculturality in international marriages have the inclusive direction as a whole, although it tends to be exclusive occasionally. Regarding the international marriage, it has been established based on the exchange mechanism, in reality, due to cultural differences and miscommunications, potential conflicts can be caused as varied forms. Nevertheless, by the efforts of the parties in international marriages, who strive to maintain long-term relationship, the multiculturality in international marriages shows inclusive direction.
The second, foreign students stay in Korea for shorter term than marriage migrants. Therefore, foreign students accept what they need, while, reveal negative attitude not in case of necessity, instead of adapting to Korean society and trying to form a friendship actively. Thus, their multiculturality is situated in the border line between inclusion and exclusion.
The third, the specified multicultural district of ‘Bukbu Bus Terminal’ in Seogu district, Daegu is urban cultural spaces that coexist with inclusion and exclusion. Although government has the diverse policy for the coexistence of different cultures, indigenous people and foreign immigrants within the space are indifferent to each other. Koreans understand this place as a kind of foreign settlement on the basis of prejudice and inaccessible area. It shows that the specified multicultural district does not obtain the inclusive direction. In sum, foreign settlement has an exclusive direction that shows sign of developing ghetto.

Key Words: multiculturality, inclusion, exclusion, ghettoize, international marriages, foreign students, specified multicultural district