지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 이동언
- 발행연도
- 2015
- 저작권
- 부산대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수27
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between abstraction and re-presentation. The two terms abstraction and re-presentation here originated from the difference of attitudes towards tradition: Abstraction refers to attitude turning away from tradition. It is a creative will to withdraw a new quality into the existing context. Re-presentation is the tendency to imitate tradition. Here, tradition indicates lived experience based on memories immanent within the tradition, as well as the styles which are shown on the surface. Both abstraction and re-presentation act as contradictory to each other, but they also exist together.
This paper aims to show that abstraction and re-presentation benefit architecture from being revealed in balance. It looked at this relationship by comparing the ''pilotis space'' in Le Corbusier''s architectural works with those of Kim Jung-Up. Pilotis space is shown through architectural history from ancient times, and in this paper, it refers to space created through separation from the ground by the use of pillars. By looking into the differences of pilotis space by Le Corbusier and Kim Jung-Up, this paper compares and analyses the view of nature of the east and the west. Through this comparative analysis, this paper further explores the constitutive balance between abstraction and re-presentation shown in the architectural works of both architects.
Finally, through this exploration, this paper argues that abstraction always co-exist with re-presentation which is based on the past, and that re-presentation is an adventurous process to look for novelty in memories and present these memories in an arbitrary abstraction, creative, way.
This paper aims to show that abstraction and re-presentation benefit architecture from being revealed in balance. It looked at this relationship by comparing the ''pilotis space'' in Le Corbusier''s architectural works with those of Kim Jung-Up. Pilotis space is shown through architectural history from ancient times, and in this paper, it refers to space created through separation from the ground by the use of pillars. By looking into the differences of pilotis space by Le Corbusier and Kim Jung-Up, this paper compares and analyses the view of nature of the east and the west. Through this comparative analysis, this paper further explores the constitutive balance between abstraction and re-presentation shown in the architectural works of both architects.
Finally, through this exploration, this paper argues that abstraction always co-exist with re-presentation which is based on the past, and that re-presentation is an adventurous process to look for novelty in memories and present these memories in an arbitrary abstraction, creative, way.
목차
제 1 장 서 론 11 - 1. 연구의 배경과 목적 11 - 2. 연구의 범위와 방법 5제 2 장 추상과 재현 82 - 1. 추상 122-1-1. 근대예술과 추상 132-1-2. 근대건축과 추상 202 - 2. 재현 252-2-1. 근대예술과 재현 282-2-2. 근대건축과 재현 312 - 3. 추상과 재현의 관계 34제 3 장 필로티공간의 추상과 재현 423 - 1. 필로티공간 423 - 2. 서양의 자연관과 필로티공간 483 - 3. 동양의 자연관과 필로티공간 56제 4 장 르 꼬르뷔지에와 김중업 건축의 필로티공간에서 추상과 재현 674 - 1. 르 꼬르뷔지에와 김중업 674 - 2. 르 꼬르뷔지에 건축의 필로티공간 724-2-1. 서양 고전건축에 대한 탐구 744-2-2. 근대건축으로 재해석한 필로티공간 834-2-3. 순수주의 회화연구와 필로티공간의 추상화 874 - 3. 김중업 건축의 필로티공간 984-3-1. 근대적 필로티공간과의 유사성과 차이 1044-3-2. 한국전통건축의 재현적 형상화 1094-3-3. 전통건축의 재해석을 통한 추상화 120제 5 장 결론 133참 고 문 헌 137Abstract 141
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0