메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김현정 (부산대학교, 부산대학교 대학원)

지도교수
손문
발행연도
2015
저작권
부산대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수0

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Gusandong Tuff is an extensive rhyolitic ignimbrite that has been used as an excellent key bed in the Cretaceous Gyeongsang Basin, SE Korea. Magnetic fabric analysis in the tuff, using AMS (Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility) technique, shows an anomalous fabric which has horizontal k3 and vertical k1 axes in several sites. We attempted a stepwise thermal treatment to investigate the changes of AMS axes and parameters (T, PJ) in four sites (KT11B, KT11M, KT18B, KT18M). The changing patterns of magnetic fabric during heating are classified into 4 main types: (1) Type-0 is characterized by unchanged three principal axes (k1, k2, k3) overall heating steps. (2) Type-I shows the exchange of k1 and k2 axes each other. Type-I can be classified as subtype Type-IS (axes are suddenly changed) and Type-IG (axes are gradually changed). (3) Type-II is characterized by the exchange of k2 and k3 axes each other. (4) Type-III shows that three principal axes switch their positions with one another. Type-III can be classified as subtype Type-IIIA (k1→k2, k2→k3, k3→k1) and Type-IIIB (k1→k3, k3→k2, k2→k3). The directional changes of the axes begin between 500-580°C and then terminate near 670°C. Except for Type-0 and Type-IS, most of the magnetic fabrics are transformed gradually. The changes of axis orientation and magnitude observed in this study can be reasonably explained with the theoretical inverse fabric model proposed by Rochette et al. (1992) and Ferre (2002). The magnetic fabrics of before heating, therefore, are inverse fabrics and the inverse fabric can be transformed gradually into the normal fabrics through thermal treatment. Other analysis (rock fabric analysis, rock magnetism and BSE images) are support this interpretation too. Before heating, rock magnetism shows that the main carrier of the AMS fabric is paramagnetic minerals with small amount of ferromagnetic mineral (except Type-0). The fabric is interpreted to be an inverse one attributed to single-domain (SD) or superparamagnetic (SP) magnetites based on day diagram analysis. Heating helps growing new pseudo-single domain (PSD) or multi-domain (MD) magnetites that are mimetic with respect to the biotite cleavage. This result indicates that the thermal treatment can be a strongly useful tool for eliminating the inverse AMS magnetic fabric of natural rocks.

목차

1. 서 언
2. 구산동응회암
3. 연구방법
3.1. 대자율이방성(AMS)
3.2. 역미세구조(inverse fabric)
3.3. 실험방법
4. 분석결과
4.1. 열처리에 따른 AMS 변화
4.1.1. 열처리 전 결과
4.1.2. KT11B
4.1.3. KT11M
4.1.4. KT18B
4.1.5. KT18M
4.1.6. 열처리에 따른 AMS 변화의 유형별 분류
4.2. 열처리에 따른 AARM 변화
4.2.1. 유형별 AMS와 AARM 비교
4.2.2. 지점별 AMS와 AARM 비교
4.3. 열처리에 따른 자성광물 변화
4.3.1. Type 0
4.3.2. Type I
4.3.3. Type II
4.3.4. Type III
4.3.5. 자기구역 분석
4.4. EMPA 분석결과
4.5. 골격입자 분석
5. 토 의
5.1. 자기미세구조의(AMS) 변화 유형
5.2. 자성광물의 변화와 Thermal enhancement 효과
6. 결 론
참 고 문 헌

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0