메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김영경 (부산대학교, 부산대학교 대학원)

지도교수
정인숙
발행연도
2015
저작권
부산대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수22

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
연구목적: 수술동의서에 기술된 용어에 대한 환자의 이해도와 설명만족도를 파악하여 환자의 이해도 향상에 도움을 줄 수 있는 요인과 효과적인 방법을 알아보고자 수행된 조사연구이다.
연구방법: 본 연구는 2014년 7월 1일부터 2014년 8년 30일 까지 울산에 소재한 일개 정형외과 병원에 수술을 목적으로 입원한 환자 243명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 조사 내용은 수술 동의서에 기술된 용어에 대한 인지, 주관적 이해도, 객관적 이해도, 설명만족도이다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS 22.0 프로그램을 이용하여 기술통계, χ2-test, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test, 상관관계 분석을 시행하였다
연구결과: 수술동의서에 기술된 10개의 용어 중 인지하고 있는 용어는 평균 6.23개였다. 주관적 이해도는 평균 100점 기준 74점이었고, 객관적 이해도는 평균 89점, 설명만족도는 평균 68점이었다. 수술동의서에 기술된 용어의 인지에 따른 주관적 이해도는 유의한 차이가 있었다. 수술동의서에 기술된 용어의 인지에 따른 객관적 이해도는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 일반적 특성에 따른 용어의 인지는 연령(p<.001), 교육수준(p=<.001), 직업(p<.001)에 유의한 차이가 있었다. 주관적 이해도는 교육수준(p<.001), 가구당 월수입(p=<.001), 직업(p<.001), 객관적 이해도는 연령(p=.003), 교육수준(p=.001), 가구당월수입(p<.001)에 유의한 차이가 있었다. 설명만족도는 연령(p=.005)에 유의한 차이가 있었다. 수술동의서에 기술된 용어의 인지는 주관적 이해도(r=.301, p<.001)와 객관적 이해도(r=.255, p<.001), 설명만족도(r=.168, p=.009)간에 주관적 이해도는 객관적 이해도(r=.329, p<.001)와 설명만족도(r=.136, p=.034)간에 유의한 상관관계가 있었다.
결론: 수술동의서 용어에 대한 환자의 이해도와 설명만족도 향상을 위한 효과적인 방법이 필요하다고 생각된다. 특히 환자와 가까운 거리에 있는 간호사의 역할이 중요하다.

목차

I. 서론 ···························································································· 1
1. 연구의 필요성 ·········································································· 1
2. 연구의 목적 ·············································································· 3
3. 용어의 정의 ·············································································· 4
II. 문헌고찰 ··················································································· 6
III. 연구방법 ················································································· 11
1. 연구설계 ·················································································· 11
2. 연구대상 ·················································································· 11
3. 연구도구 ·················································································· 11
4. 자료 수집 기간 및 방법 ························································ 15
5. 자료 분석 방법 ······································································· 16
IV. 연구결과 ··············································································· 17
1. 대상자의 일반적 특성 ·························································· 17
2. 수술동의서에 기술된 용어의 인지 ····································· 19
3. 수술동의서에 기술된 용어의 주관적 이해도 ···················· 20
4. 수술동의서에 기술된 용어의 객관적 이해도 ···················· 21
5. 수술동의서 설명만족도 ························································ 22
6. 용어의 인지에 따른 주관적 이해도 ···································· 23
7. 용어의 인지에 따른 객관적 이해도 ···································· 24
8. 일반적 특성에 따른 용어의 인지 ········································ 25
9. 일반적 특성에 따른 주관적 이해도 ···································· 27
10. 일반적 특성에 따른 객관적 이해도 ·································· 29
11. 일반적 특성에 따른 설명만족도 ········································ 31
12. 용어의 인지, 주관적 이해도, 객관적 이해도,
설명만족도 상관관계 ··························································· 33
V. 논의 ·························································································· 34
VI. 결론 및 제언 ·········································································· 39
참고문헌 ························································································ 41
부록 ································································································ 46
Abstract ························································································· 57

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0