메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

이광희 (충북대학교, 충북대학교 대학원)

지도교수
최재호
발행연도
2015
저작권
충북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수34

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper account for 3-level NPC and T-type inverter system. A major advantage of 3-level inverter system is the lower current THD than 2-level inverter. Because 3-level inverter has lower voltage rating of power switches than 2-level inverter. So low voltage rated switches which are used in 3-level inverters are faster, smaller, and cheaper than high voltage rated switches used in 2-level inverters. Above all, 3-level inverter is the possibility to use IGBTs with breakdown-voltage that are lower than the DC-link voltage. So the lower blocking voltage devices have a lower losses and the efficiency can be increased. By using same blocking voltage as in a 2-level inverter higher DC-link voltage can be realized.
Conventionally, there have been some studies about the calculation of power losses in the inverter system and it has been recommended that the well known topologies are the NPC(Neutral Point Clamped) and T-type inverter. A power loss analysis based on discrete type module. Discrete type module has a only two IGBTs. So, this module formed in inverter which has a line impedance more than inverter module. On the other hand, among the IGBTs in inverter type module are optimizing the manufacturing process, so inner loss is lower than discrete IGBT module. Thus, this paper choose inverter type modules then, analysis power losses for 3-level NPC and T-type inverters. T-type inverter (called by 3-level T-type inverter) compared with NPC inverter, the count of switch is reduced. So T-type inverter is better than the 3-level NPC inverter (called by 3-level NPC inverter) based on the power loss analyses. In a material way the T-type inverter with the NPC inverter, it has the advantage of the short conducting path and the small number of switches due to no clamping diodes. But the comparative study about the power losses is not simple and it may lead some different results depending on the parameter characteristics of the switching devices, the switching frequency. Estimates of switching losses have been obtained using approximations of IGBT and diode I-V switching characteristics. However, a more convenient approach based on calculating switching loss using the switching energy-current characteristics curve, reveals that the switching losses of an IGBT-diode pair are approximately proportional to the switching voltage and current. This observation can be verified based on IGBT-Diode module data sheets. The conduction loss depends on the modulation index(MI) and power factor(PF), whereas the switching loss depends on the switching frequency. Power losses for the T-type and NPC inverters are analyzed and calculated at the different operating points of MI, PF and the switching frequency.
In this paper, the power loss analysis for the 3-level inverter has been analyzed. Also, the conducting loss and the switching loss in the switching devices as the different switching state are analyzed with the change of the switching frequency based on the previous works. Through these analyses, it can be confirmed that the total losses in NPC and T-type inverter may be different as the choice of switching devices with the different parameter characteristics. To prove the above, the power losses are calculated using the technical report and compared with the simulation results from the PSIM thermal module analysis. Then, power losses of the three different devices for 3-level NPC and T-type inverter modules are adopted. Finally, the total power losses of these devices in the inverters are mainly compared with conduction and switching loss. And then select to the most loss less device.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론 1
1.1 연구의 배경 1
1.2 연구의 필요성 및 내용 2
1.3 논문의 구성 3
Ⅱ. IGBT 모듈의 전력 손실 5
2.1 3-레벨 NPC 및 T-type 인버터 모듈의 전력손실 5
2.2 NPC 및 T-type 인버터의 스위치 동작과정 7
2.3 동작 영역별 Commutation path 9
2.4 IGBT 모듈의 전력 손실 계산방법 12
Ⅲ. PSIM 시뮬레이션 21
3.1 PSIM Thermal Module 21
3.2 시뮬레이션 24
3.3 Thermal Module에서의 손실계산과정 28
Ⅳ. 인버터 전력 손실비교 29
4.1 NPC 및 T-타입 인버터 손실비교 29
4.1.1 시뮬레이션 조건 30
4.1.2 Vincotech 모듈 파라미터 30
4.1.3 PSiM Thermal Module 32
4.1.4 결과 비교 38
4.2 회사별 모듈 손실비교 40
4.2.1 모듈의 손실결과 분석 및 비교 40
Ⅴ. 결론 46
참고문헌 48
부록 51

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0