지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 박영신
- 발행연도
- 2014
- 저작권
- 경북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수4
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
대학생들의 위험행동에 대해 정서적 측면의 영향을 살펴보기 위하여 긍정 및 부정 정서에서 대학생의 위험인식과 위험행동이 어떻게 달라지는지를 확인하였고, 성별의 차이도 살펴보았다. 또한 이 관계에 의도적 통제와 감각추구 성향이 미치는 영향에 대해서도 확인해보았다. 대구 지역의 대학교에 재학 중인 남녀 학생 176명이 연구에 참여하였다. 긍정 및 부정 정서는 국제정서그림체계의 사진자극에 음악을 결합한 동영상을 통해 유발하였고, 위험 인식은 영역에 대한 위험 인식과 가상 상황에서의 위험 인식 두 가지를 측정하였으며 위험행동은 드라이빙 게임을 통해 측정하였다. 마지막으로 의도적 통제 척도와 감각추구 성향 척도를 사용하여 정서와 위험인식, 위험행동 사이에 의도적 통제와 감각추구 성향이 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 긍정 및 부정 정서와 성별은 대학생들의 위험인식과 관계가 있었다. 여자들은 남자보다 위험인식을 더 높게 했고, 주로 긍정적인 정서가 유발될 때 위험인식을 더 높게 했다. 남자들은 긍정 또는 부정 정서가 유발되었을 때 위험인식을 더 낮게 했다. 둘째, 긍정 및 부정 정서와 성별은 위험행동과 관계가 있었다. 남자 대학생들은 긍정적인 정서가 유발되었을 때 위험행동을 더 많이 했다. 마지막으로, 대학생들의 의도적 통제 수준은 위험인식, 위험행동과 관계가 없었지만 감각추구 성향이 높을수록 위험인식을 낮게 하였고, 위험행동을 많이 하였다.
목차
I. 서론················································································································· 1II. 이론적 배경 ································································································ 51. 위험행동······································································································· 52. 정서와 위험인식, 위험행동 ································································· 123. 연구 문제··································································································· 16III. 연구방법···································································································· 171. 연구대상 ··································································································· 172. 측정도구 ··································································································· 173. 연구절차 ··································································································· 244. 분석방법 ··································································································· 25IV. 연구결과 및 해석··················································································· 261. 동영상을 통한 정서조작에 따른 정서 조건별 정서의 차이 ······· 262. 정서 조건과 성별에 따른 대학생들의 위험인식 ··························· 273. 정서 조건과 성별에 따른 대학생들의 위험행동 ··························· 324. 대학생의 성별, 의도적 통제, 감각추구 성향과 위험인식, 위험행동의 관계 ··········································································································· 335. 의도적 통제, 감각추구 성향을 통한 위험인식, 위험행동의 예측 ··························································································································· 35V. 논의 및 결론 ···························································································· 39참고문헌 ········································································································ 44영문초록 ········································································································ 54부록·················································································································· 55
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0