메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

장이슬 (과학기술연합대학원대학교, 과학기술연합대학원대학교 대학원)

발행연도
2014
저작권
과학기술연합대학원대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수2

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The IODP (Integrated Ocean ?Drilling Program) Expedition 336 had explored North Pond located in the western flank of Mid-Atlantic Ridge. The principal objective of IODP Expedition 336 is to explain the fundamental microbiology containing the nature of the subseafloor deep biosphere by using the relationship of oceanic hydrology, geology and biogeochemistry. As a part of the principal objective, the chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the three holes (U1382B, U1383D and U1384A) drilled in North Pond were studied in this thesis.
The major minerals of North Pond are calcite and quartz, which are main skeletal components of the calcareous microfossil and a constituent of clay minerals respectively. The minor amount of clay minerals (illite, kaolinite and chlorite) might be derived from adjacent continent by wind and/or oceanic current. Therefore, the sediments of North Pond are mainly composed of pelagic biogenic sediment with minor terrigenous clay mineral.
The major elements of North Pond are CaO and SiO2 and they are mostly originated from calcareous microfossils and diatoms respectively. The minor amount of Al2O3 and Fe2O3 may indicate the input of clay minerals into North Pond. The sediments of North Pond are divided into three units based on XRF results. Unit Ch1 represented by the high content of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and low CaO might be affected by basement contact sediments. Unit Ch2 represented by the increase of CaO and decrease of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 mainly consist of pelagic biogenic sediment. Unit Ch3 characterized by the increase of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and decrease of CaO is considered to be strongly affected by eolian matter
The common species of the calcareous nannofossils of North Pond sediments are Discoaster brouweri, D. quinqueramus and Ceratolithus telesmus with minor amount of D. challengeri, which are used for biostratigraphic boundary.
NN9-NN11B Zone (Unit N1) is represented by the conjunction of D. challengeri and D. quinqueramus with D. brouweri and is considered to be an age of Late Miocene. NN11-NN16 Zone (Unit N2) indicating late-Late Miocene to Middle Pliocene is characterized by the conjunction of D. brouweri and D. quinqueramus. NN16-NN21 Zone (Unit N3) is recognized by the conjunction of C. telsmus and D. brouweri and is thought to be an age of Late Pliocene to Pleistocene.
The common to abundant occurrences of discoaster species in NN11-NN16 Zone and NN9-NN11B Zone indicates a warm surface water temperature during the Late Miocene-Middle Pliocene.
The results between chemo- and bio-stratigraphy are generally well correlated, that is, Unit Ch1 was deposited in Late Miocene (Unit N1), Unit Ch2 was deposited from late-Late Miocene to Middle Pliocene (Unit N2), and Unit Ch3 was deposited in Late Pliocene to Pleistocene (Unit N3).

목차

1. Introduction ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1
2. Site Description ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????3
2.1. Site U1382 ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????3
2.2. Site U1383??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????16
2.3. Site U1384??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????16
3. Materials and Methods?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????18
3.1. Materials ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????18
3.2. Methods ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????18
3.2.1. Grain size analysis ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????18
3.2.2. Geochemical analysis ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????19
3.2.3. Microscopic analysis ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????20
4. Results and Discussions ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????22
4.1. Grain size analysis ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 22
4.2. XRD analysis ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????31
4.3. XRF analysis ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????36
4.4. Chemostratigraphy ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????40
4.4.1. Hole U1382B ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????40
4.4.2. Hole U1383D ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????42
4.4.3. Hole U1384A ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????43
4.4.4. Correlation ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????48
4.5. Biostratigraphy ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????50
4.5.1. Hole U1382B ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????50
4.5.2. Hole U1383D ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????62
4.5.3. Hole U1384A ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????63
4.5.4. Correlation ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????65
4.5.5. Paleoenvironment ???????????????????????????????????????

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0