메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

최상현 (한양대학교, 한양대학교 대학원)

지도교수
김찬형
발행연도
2014
저작권
한양대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수0

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Liquid ionization chamber has superior characteristics than air-filled ionization chamber due to small size, high signal-to-noise and perturbation effect. Especially in small field dosimetry, the liquid ionization cahmber may potentially become a proper tool as the reference dosimeter. Currently, however, the methodologies, and physical quantities, and the limitations for use in the clinical radiation dosimetry are not clearly described for the relative and reference dosimeter using the liquid ionization chamber.
In the present work, we studied the dosimetric characteristics of the microLion chamber, which is a commercial liquid ionization chamber, and determined the correction factors for the absorbed dose to water measurement. In addition, we verified the experimental method to acquire the beam quality correction factor by Monte Carlo simulations. For the dosimetric characteristics of the micrioLion cahmber, the results were compared with those of semiflex, pinpoint and diode chambers and evaluated to be suitable for small fields. This study was performed using the 6MV photon beam from a Varian iX linac accelerator and a MP3 water phantom (PTW, Freiburg) was used for measurements of the dose rate and dose linearity dependency, spatial resolution and output factors.
For the absorbed dose to water measurement, we determined the absorbed dose to water calibration factor, the beam quality correction factor and the influence quantities using a cobalt-60 gamma ray beam, a Clinac iX with 6 and 10 MV photon beams and an Oncor impression with 6 and 15 MV photon beams. For the ion recombination correction, the method presented in the present study was developed and compared with the existing theoretical and two-dose-rate methods. Finally, the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code was used to estimate the beam quality correction factor of the microLion chamber.
Our results show that the readings of the chamber were proportional to the dose. The dose rate dependency showed a maximum difference of 5.0% from 100 MU/min to 600 MU/min. The spatial resolutions determined by comparing profiles for the field sizes of 0.5x0.5 cm2 to 10x10 cm2 agreed among the detectors except for the semiflex chamber to within 2 %. Outputs of the detectors showed good agreement (< 2 %) for all the detectors considered in this study.
The N_(D,W,Q_0 ) factor of the microLion chamber acquired in the present study was 0.094342 ± 0.00158 Gy/nc. The beam quality correction factors (k_(Q,Q_0 )) calculated for the 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams for the Clinac iX were 1.0021±0.0116 and 1.0015±0.0114, respectively. For the 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams from the Oncor impression, the k_(Q,Q_0 ) factors were 1.0027±0.012 and 1.0022±0.0123, respectively. For ion recombination correction, our method showed a good result compared to the theoretical and the two-dose-rate methods.
Finally, our Monte Carlo calculation results (1.0183±0.58%) agreed, within 0.56%, with experimental results (1.024±0.58%). The results from these two methods were in good agreements, i.e., within acceptable uncertainties.
With these results, we believe that the microLion ionization chamber can be used to measure the absorbed dose to water not only in reference conditions, but also in small field or non-standard field condition. We also belive that the methodologies and physical quantities presented in the present study will be a good guide to use the liquid ionization chamber as reference dosimeter.

목차

TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES ix
ABSTRACT xi
CHAPTER
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. THEORY AND METHOD 4
2.1. Dosimetric characteristics of microLion chamber 4
2.2 Determination of factors for absorbed dose to water measurement 9
2.2.1 Radiation setup 9
2.2.2 Absorbed dose to water calibration factor 12
2.2.3 Beam quality correction factor 12
2.2.4 Temperature and pressure correction 15
2.2.5 Polarity correction 15
2.2.6 Ion recombination 16
2.3 Monte Carlo simulation for beam quality correction factor 23
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSTION 34
3.1 Dosimetric characteristics of microLion chamber 34
3.2 Absorbed dose to water calibration factor 42
3.3 Beam quality correction factor 42
3.4 Temperature and pressure correction factor 43
3.5 Polarity correction factor 43
3.6 Ion recombination correction factor 46
3.7 Correction factors for the absorbed dose to water 60
3.8 Verification beam quality correction factor using Monte Carlo simulation 63
V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 69
ANNEX. MATLAB CODE FOR DETERMINATION OF ION RECOMBINATION FOR TWO-DOSE-RATE
MEHTOD 71
REFERENCES 72
ABSTRACT (In Korean) 76
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (In Korean) 78

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0