메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김형기 (순천향대학교, 순천향대학교 대학원)

지도교수
김영석
발행연도
2014
저작권
순천향대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수13

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: TIPS procedure is an option for managing portal hypertension. We assessed the clinical outcome of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for managing portal hypertension in Koreans with liver cirrhosis.
Methods: Between January 2003 and July 2013, 230 patients underwent TIPS in 13 university-based hospitals.
Results: Of the 229 (99.6%) patients who successfully underwent TIPS placement, 142 underwent TIPS for variceal bleeding, 84 for refractory ascites, and three for other indications. The mean follow-up was 24.9 ± 30.2 months. Of the stents, 74.7% were covered. The primary patency rate at the 1-year follow-up was 78.7%. During the follow-up, 30 (21.1%) patients hemorrhaged. Of these, 28 (93.3%) cases of rebleeding were associated with stent dysfunction. Fifty-four (23.6%) patients newly developed hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and most of these patients were successfully managed conservatively. The cumulative survival rates at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months were 87.5, 75.0, 66.8, and 57.5%, respectively. High MELD score (P = 0.018) were significantly associated to the risk of death within the first month after TIPS. Old age (P < 0.001), indication for TIPS (ascites vs. bleeding; P = 0.005), low serum albumin (P < 0.001), and high MELD score (P = 0.006) were associated with overall mortality.
Conclusions: Patients with high MELD score showed significantly associated with early and overall mortality rate. Proper indication is warranted to improve survival in patients with TIPS.

목차

CONTENTS
Table content ii
Figure content iii
Abstract 1
Abstract (Korean) 3
I. Introduction 5
II. Patients and Methods 6
A. Patients 6
B. TIPS procedure and follow-up 6
C. Measured outcomes 7
D. Statistical analysis 8
III. results 8
A. Patients’ characteristics 8
B. Shunt procedure and procedure related
complication 9
C. Shunt patency 10
D. Recurrent bleeding after TIPS placement 10
E. Ascites response 11
F. Hepatic encephalopathy 11
G. Mortality 11
IV. Discussion 14
V. Conclusion 17
References 18
Tables 22
Figure 28

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0