메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

조재만 (충남대학교, 충남대학교 행정대학원)

지도교수
박대식
발행연도
2014
저작권
충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수5

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze factors affecting organizational effectiveness based on integration of public agencies focusing on cases of the Korea Rural Community Corporation.
The author of this study investigated significant differences in number of employees, number of organizations, total expenditure, sales, and net income from the aspect of structural function before and after the integration.
The results showed that the number of employees and the number of organizations were lower in after than in before the integration, while the total expenditure and the sales were higher in after than in before the integration. The net income did not show significant difference before and after the integration, indicating that it may be caused by the characteristics of the case organization that regard public interest as more important than profitability. The total expenditure and the sales were not reduced even when the organization and the human resource were reduced maybe because of effects of organization integration.
As for the effects of the number of employees and the number of organizations on the total expenditure, the sales, and the net income, the number of employees after the integration had negative effects on the total expenditure, the sales, and the net income, indicating that reduction in number of employees is the most effective factor on integration effects.
The number of organizations did not affect the total expenditure and the sales, while having positive effects on the net income, a result that may be caused by the characteristics of public agencies that should consider profitability as well as public interest.
In this study, independent variables included organization credibility, organization expertise, leadership, and organization culture, while dependent variables included policy coordination, organization learning, organization efficiency, and organization satisfaction.
As a result of analysis, personnel management fairness, goal specificity, and collective culture were shown to be factors having positive effects on policy coordination, indicating that policy coordination may be more favorable as personnel management is fairer, organizational goals are more specified, and scope of job is more limited in collective organization culture more strongly.
Member credibility, goal specificity, reasonable culture, and hierarchical culture were shown to be factors having positive effects on organization learning, indicating that the levels of organization learning may be higher as credibility on members is higher, organizational goals are more specified, and organization culture is more reasonable and hierarchical.
Leadership was shown not to affect organization learning; it may be caused by the fact that effects of leadership were not sufficient due to frequent changes of the chief administrators, a position that is politically affected in appointment.
It was collective culture that was a factor having positive effects on organization efficiency.
Personnel management fairness, goal specificity, collective culture, and reasonable culture were shown to be factors having positive effects on organization satisfaction, Indicating that satisfaction may be higher as personnel management fairness and organizational goals are more specified and scope of job is more limited in collective and reasonable organization culture more strongly.
It is particular that expansion in job scope had negative effects on organizational effectiveness based on the results of this study. The results are worthy of notice in that, though reduction in human resource and organization is considered a byword for integration, monolithic reduction may have negative effects on organizational effectiveness.
The results of this study also suggest from a political aspect that the term of the chief administrators should be respected in order for responsibility management because the effects of leadership are hard to be realized when the chief administrators are frequently changed due to political appointment.
Previous studies of organization integration and organizational effectiveness have focused on types of cultures, but further studies are needed to expand their research scope with comprehensive approaches, including external participating factors such as the National Assembly, the government, farmers, and groups of the persons concerned.

목차

제 1 장 서론 . 1
제1절 연구의 목적 . 1
제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 . 4
제 2 장 이론적 배경과 선행연구 . 7
제1절 조직통합의 의의 . 7
1. 조직설계의 원리 7
2. 조직통합의 개념 및 조직개편 접근법 9
3. 조직통합의 목적 11
4. 한국농어촌공사 통합개요 13
제2절 조직통합의 영향요인 및 효과성 . 22
1. 조직통합의 영향요인 22
2. 조직통합의 효과성 26
제3절 선행연구 . 29
1. 선행연구 검토 29
2. 선행연구의 한계점 39
제 3 장 연구의 설계 . 41
제1절 분석틀 . 41
제2절 가설의 설정과 변수의 조작적 정의 44
1. 가설의 설정 . 44
2. 변수의 조작적 정의와 측정 . 49
제3절 조사 및 자료처리 57
1. 표본의 선정 및 자료수집 . 57
2. 설문지 구성 . 58
3. 자료처리 59
제 4 장 연구의 결과 . 60
제1절 구조 기능적 측면 연구의 결과 60
1. 지표의 환산 . 60
2. 구조 기능적 측면 가설의 검증 . 64
제2절 조직 관리적 측면 연구의 결과 91
1. 표본의 특성 및 신뢰성 검증 . 91
2. 조직 관리적 측면 가설의 검증 . 96
제 5 장 결론 . 110
제1절 연구결과의 요약 . 110
제2절 연구의 제언 및 한계 . 114
참고문헌 . 117
설문지 . 122
ABSTRACT . 129

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0