메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

문영진 (울산대학교, 울산대학교 대학원)

지도교수
이유미
발행연도
2014
저작권
울산대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수0

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Introduction : In pediatric patients, dynamic preload indices to predict fluid responsiveness have conflicting results in comparison with adults. A recent study demonstrated that pulse pressure variation (PPV) ≥16% has provided an accurate method for predicting fluid responsiveness in pediatric congenital heart surgery. The present study was designed to compare PPV and respiratory systolic, diastolic and pulse transit time interval variation (STV, DTV and PTTV, respectively) as predictors of fluid responsiveness during pediatric liver transplantation.
Methods : A total of 61 data from 16 pediatric patients, median age 8.5 months (range 0.1 - 7 yr), were retrospectively evaluated from electrically recorded radial arterial and central venous pressure (CVP) waveform. The time from the onset of systolic upstroke to the dicrotic notch was defined as the systolic time interval (STI), and the time from dicrotic notch to the beginning of systolic upstroke was defined as the diastolic time interval (DTI). The time from peak R wave on electrocardiography to the onset of systolic upstroke was defined as the pulse transit time (PTT) interval. STV was calculated by averaging of three consecutive respiratory cycles with the following: (STImaximum - STIminimum) / STImean. Same method was used for calculating DTV, PTTV and PPV. STV, DTV and PTTV were corrected by cardiac period. Averaged CVP was used as a static preload index. PPV threshold of ≥16% was used to discriminate fluid responsiveness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Pearson’s correlation analysis were used for the comparison.
Results : PPV showed correlations with STV, DTV and PTTV (r = 0.65, 0.57 and 0.60, respectively), but less with CVP (r = - 0.30). Area under ROC curves (AUC) of STV, DTV, PTTV and CVP were 0.834, 0.872, 0.832 and 0.613, respectively. Cut-off values of STV, DTV and PTTV were 7.7% (sensitivity/specificity, 0.80/0.83), 7.7% (sensitivity/specificity, 0.70/0.88) and 8.7% (sensitivity/specificity 0.67/1.0), respectively.
Conclusion : This study shows that STV, DTV and PTTV showed correlation with PPV, suggesting that this novel method may have a potential to predict hemodynamic response during pediatric surgery.

목차

Abstract
List of figures and tables
Introduction
Method
Result
Discussion
Reference

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0