A Study on Bankers’ Documents Examination Criteria in Letter of Credit Transaction -Focused on Practical Usage Analysis-
Kim, Sang Jo Dept. of International Trade Graduate School Gyeongsang National University Directed by Professor Choi, Keun -Bae
This study aims to review and analyze the compliance criteria of a letter of credit(L/C) by investigating bankers’procedures for examining document conditions in practice. Under the base of letter of credit transaction, the payment of bank depends upon just only documents requested in it. Banks require sellers to make a presentation of documents in strictly compliance and matching with the information contained in letter of credit. However, the inconsistency of documents does not ensure prompt payment to the importer and exporter, and causes concerned parties a big loss in practice. In this study, the researcher tries to grasp and understand the actual condition of strictness on documents which has been applying by practitioners of bank on matching transaction documents under the letter of credit base. In order to perform practical usage analysis, a questionnaire survey targeted 190 bankers who in charge of the payment for an export and import procedure was conducted, and both frequency analysis and cross-tab analysis using statistical process program, an SPSS 18.0 version were performed. The goodness of fit of cross-tab was verified by Pearson chi-square test, and by statistical significance at the 0.05 level in verification. The analysis results of documents’examination carried out in practice by banking practitioners are as follows: Firstly, bankers’document examine practitioners pay a considerable caution on letter of credit inspection, when slight discrepancy taken place, it can be treated as compliance of document. Secondly, in particular, bankers’document examine practitioners make use of UCP provisions as an international standard banking practices instead of using, such as, an ICC(International Chamber of Commerce) opinion in practical aspect. Thirdly, any of aggressive attempts does not seem to be existed on recognition by exploring the international standard banking practices, when there is no explicit international standard banking practice. Fourthly, because UCP 600 arranges the extremely relaxed concept of compliance, if only there is no conflict with the documents in the letter of credit agreement, there seems to be thought to reduce the discrepancy in practice. Fifthly, bankers’document examine practitioners can not treat anything that without written messages, such as, important documents or intention for originality as an exception of strict compliance during the document review. Sixthly, because bankers’document examine practitioners can not find out clear standards for document review in UCP at any moment, they can not help examining the document in subjective and arbitrary manner. Therefore the researcher tries to propose the compliance criteria of bankers’document examine practitioners for rapid document review as follows: Firstly, for the purpose of wide utilizing the evidence against discrepancies bankers’document examine practitioners have to use the ICC Statement Policy, ICC Opinion, and so forth. Secondly, bankers’document examine practitioners have to take active examination of documents after exploring the international standard banking practice, rather than to take a defensive position during the document examination in practice. Thirdly, bankers’document examine practitioners have to maintain the flexibility in dealing with international standard banking practices with the ISBP, without excessive biased judgement with the UCP in practical use. Fourthly, bankers’document examine practitioners should have the elasticity not only for judging the severity of the condition, but treating the matching principle to exception of letter of credit. Fifthly, bankers’document examine practitioners have to take some treatment to reduce discrepancies within the scope of their discretion recognized by UCP. The compliance criteria of bankers’document examine practitioners proposed in the research will secure prompt payment, avoiding disputes on discrepancy criteria in practice. Thus, the researcher expects to expand the usage of letter of credit transaction, to make a delayed payment for a long term to prompt settlement in practice.
목차
ABSTRACT ⅵⅠ. 서 론 11. 연구목적 12. 연구방법 2Ⅱ. 신용장 서류심사의 기초적 원리 41. 독립·추상성의 원칙 41) 신용장의 독립성 42) 신용장의 추상성 53) 독립 ? 추상성의 효과 64) 독립·추상성의 예외 82. 은행의 서류심사기준 101) 엄격일치 원칙 102) 상당일치의 원칙 223) 국제표준은행관행의 도입 263. 엄격일치 원칙의 예외 281) 신용장 문면에 대한 엄격일치의 예외 282) 계약법 상 엄격일치 원칙의 예외 304. 제시서류 적용범위와 일치성요건 351) 제시서류의 적용범위 352) 제시서류의 일치성요건 405. 우리나라 대법원의 서류심사의 일치성 판단 근거 431) UCP 432) 국제표준은행관행 483) ICC의 Policy Statement, ICC Opinion 534) 국제적 신용장전문가의 의견 555) 국내 ? 외 판례 566) 은행실무 57Ⅲ. 국내·외의 서류심사 일치성의 적용 사례분석 581. 엄격일치 사례분석 581) 1933년 UCP 제정 이전의 외국사례 582) 1933년 UCP제정 이후의 사례 593) 1951년 제1차 UCP 개정 이후의 사례 604) 1962년 제2차 개정 이후의 사례 615) 1974년 제3차 UCP 개정 이후의 사례 612. 엄격일치 완화 사례분석 621) 1983년 제4차 개정 이후의 사례 622) 1993년 제5차 개정 이후의 엄격일치 완화 사례 643) 2002년 제정된 ISBP 645 이후의 사례 724) 2007년 제6차 개정 이후의 최근의 사례 763. 사례분석의 시사점 784. 실태분석을 위한 측정변수 도출 81Ⅳ. 국내 은행 서류심사자의 서류심사 실태분석 841. 국내 은행 서류심사자의 실무상 서류심사의 실태분석 841) 실태 분석의 필요성과 목적 842) 표본의 특성 및 일반현황 843) 신용장 서류심사의 요인분석 및 신뢰성 분석 874) 금융기관별 요인별 교차분석 905) 일치성 판단기준과 서류의 불일치율 간의 회귀분석 1022. 실태분석 결과와 문제점 1031) 실태분석결과 1032) 은행 서류심사자의 서류심사 실무상의 문제점 및 그 개선방향 112Ⅴ. 결 론 122<참고문헌> 125<부록> 설문지 131