This study set out to investigate what kind of impact corporate social responsibility(CSR) perceived by individual organizational employees would have on their attitude and behavior within the organization and identify the factors mediating such impacts, thus providing new implications for the roles of CSR activities from the perspective of human resources management and the contribution plans of CSR activities from the perspective of organizational effectiveness. The study focused on the attitude and behavior variables, namely organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior, in the analysis of connections between organizational members'' CSR perception and response and examined the mediating roles of organizational prestige and organizational trust in those influential relations. The research findings were summarized as follows: first, empirical analysis results confirm positive influential relations between all the subdimensions of CSR, which include economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility, and organizational prestige perceived by organizational members. In other words, when organizational members perceive that their organization fulfills its economic responsibility to continue to generate profits within the legal framework of compliance management, practices ethical and moral ethics management, and performs activities contributing to the community sincerely, they get to believe that the organizational prestige of their organization is high among the stakeholders outside the organization. Second, the organizational members'' perceptions of the fulfillment of the subdimensions of CSR, namely economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility, by the organization turned out to have positive influence on their organizational trust. Third, the organizational members'' perceptions of economic, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility of the subdimensions of CSR turned out to have positive effects on their organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Since legal responsibility connotes "enforcement," organizational members regard the organization''s activities to fulfill legal responsibility as a responsibility that the organization must fulfill naturally and justly for its survival. Negative effects stemming from the nonfulfillment of the responsibility will be more sensitive than positive effects stemming from the fulfillment of the responsibility. Therefore, its importance cannot be ignored just because the hypothesis has been dismissed. Fourth, the organizational members'' perceptions of organizational prestige among external stakeholders turned out to have significant positive(+) effects on their organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior measured in the study as part of organizational members'' attitude and behavior. Fifth, the organizational members'' support and conviction for the organization or organizational trust turned out to have significant positive(+) impacts on their organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Sixth, organizational prestige was proven to have mediating effects between the organizational members'' perceptions of economic, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility of the four subvariables of CSR and their organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Ethical and philanthropic responsibility, in particular, fully mediated between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior, which are the representative attitude and behavior variables of organizational members, which highlights the importance of organizational prestige perceived by organizational members outside the organization in ethical and moral responsibility and philanthropic activities that are not prescribed in law but are actively performed by the organization. Finally, organizational trust was proven to have partial mediating effects on the influential relations between the organizational members'' perceptions of economic, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility of the four subvariables of CSR and their organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. This study sheds light on the relationships of CSR and employees’ attitudes and behaviors. We propose that many researches are needed regarding a variety of situational variables which could have impact on the relationships of CSR and employees’ attitudes and behaviors.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 11. 문제의 제기 12. 연구 목적 3Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 51. 기업의 사회적 책임 5(1) 기업의 사회적 책임의 개념 5(2) 기업의 사회적 책임의 개념의 발전과정 12(3) 기업의 사회적 책임의 개념의 다양성 13(4) 기업의 사회적 책임의 측정과 표준화 동향 14(5) 기업의 사회적 책임의 선행연구 172. 조직평판 23(1) 개념 23(2) 조직평판에 대한 선행연구 273. 조직신뢰 29(1) 개념 29(2) 조직신뢰 선행 연구 324. 조직몰입 34(1) 개념 34(2) 조직몰입 선행연구 365. 조직시민행동 39(1) 개념 39(2) 조직시민행동 선행연구 41Ⅲ. 연구설계 441. 연구모형 442. 연구가설 44(1) 지각된 기업의 사회적 책임과 조직평판과의 관계 45(2) 지각된 기업의 사회적 책임과 조직신뢰와의 관계 47(3) 지각된 기업의 사회적 책임과 조직구성원의 태도 및 행동과의 관계 49(4) 조직평판과 조직구성원의 태도 및 행동과의 관계 53(5) 조직신뢰와 조직구성원의 태도 및 행동과의 관계 54(6) 지각된 CSR과 조직구성원의 태도 및 행동과의 관계에서 조직평판의 매개 역할 58(7) 지각된 CSR과 조직구성원의 태도?행동과의 관계에서 조직신뢰의 매개 역할 60Ⅳ. 조사설계 621. 표본 선정 622. 변수의 조작적 정의와 측정 63(1) 기업의 사회적 책임 63(2) 조직평판 63(3) 조직신뢰 64(4) 조직구성원의 태도 및 행동 64(5) 통제변수 663. 설문의 구성 664. 분석방법 68Ⅴ. 실증분석 711. 기초통계분석 712. 타당도와 신뢰도 분석 72(1) 타당성 검증 72(2) 신뢰성 검증 743. 상관관계 분석 754. 연구가설 검증 77(1) 지각된 기업의 사회적 책임과 조직평판과의 관계에 대한 분석 77(2) 지각된 기업의 사회적 책임과 조직신뢰 간의 관계에 대한 분석 78(3) 지각된 기업의 사회적 책임과 조직구성원의 태도 및 행동 간의 관계에 대한 분석 79(4) 조직평판과 조직구성원의 태도 및 행동 간의 관계에 대한 분석 80(5) 조직신뢰와 조직구성원의 태도 및 행동 간의 관계에 대한 분석 81(6) 지각된 기업의 사회적 책임과 조직구성원의 태도?행동과의 관계에서 조직평판의 매개 효과 분석 83(7) 지각된 기업의 사회적 책임과 조직구성원의 태도?행동 간의 관계에서 조직신뢰의 매개 효과 분석 865. 연구가설 검증 요약 89Ⅵ. 토의 및 결론 921. 연구요약 및 시사점 92(1) 연구요약 92(2) 시사점 972. 연구의 한계 및 제언 98<참고문헌> 1001. 국내문헌 1002. 국외문헌 105부록 : 설문지 122