메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이재홍 (가천대학교) 이재욱 (가천대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회논문집 大韓建築學會論文集 第41卷 第3號(通卷 第437號)
발행연도
2025.3
수록면
113 - 124 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Many studies have analyzed hospital location selection using methods such as the analytic hierarchy process, focus group interviews, or kernel density tools, and have proposed optimal site selection models. However, these methods are difficult to apply to essential healthcare facilities like regional children’s hospitals, as they often fail to account for diverse socio-demographic characteristics of communities and architectural factors, including legal constraints. This study aims to develop practical and efficient site assessment criteria and evaluate their effectiveness through case studies of seven proposed sites for a children’s hospital in Busan, Korea. The literature review identified 13 site assessment criteria, divided into two main categories. The first category, focused on medical demand, resources, and usage, includes healthcare indicators such as the number of children, the ratio of children with disabilities, the number of general and acute hospital beds, the availability of obstetrics, gynecology, and pediatrics specialists, as well as the Timely Relevance Index (TRI) and Relevance Index (RI). The second category, centered on site characteristics, includes architectural indicators such as compliance with site area requirements, development efficiency, timely approval of building permits, potential for future expansion, and economic feasibility. Case studies concluded that healthcare indicators are effective for identifying vulnerable regions at a macro scale, while architectural indicators provide detailed insights into the feasibility of specific sites at a micro scale.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 문헌고찰
3. 입지 선정을 위한 평가지표
4. 의료수요/자원/이용 평가지표 적용
5. 부지특성 평가지표 적용
6. 평가지표 종합
7. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092447016