지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2025.2
- 수록면
- 49 - 83 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2025.2.36.1.49
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Due to the occurrence of commercial gentrification, existing small business owners who have contributed to the formation of a unique commercial area lose their livelihoods due to rising rents and are forced to relocate involuntarily.
In its place, the entry of large-scale distributors and franchises that have become uniform disappears the unique characteristics of the commercial area, which in turn reduces the commercial area, negatively affecting all parties in the local community, such as landlords, tenants, and business operators.
As commercial gentrification in commercial spaces has reached a serious state across the country, the government feels the need to voluntarily participate in the voluntary participation of landlords and tenants in responding to commercial gentrification, revitalizing commercial areas, and protecting small businesses, as well as establishing a legal basis to protect local commercial rights.
Against this backdrop, the "Act on the Coexistence and Revitalization of Regional Commercial Areas (hereinafter referred to as the Regional Commercial Zone Act)" was enacted on July 27, 2021, and came into effect on April 28, 2022.
This course analyzes whether the Local Commercial Zone Act, which was enacted to respond to commercial gentrification, revitalize commercial rights, and protect small business owners, is effectively working in the field of life of small business owners.
As a method of judging effectiveness, post-hoc legislative impact analysis is used during legislative impact analysis, and appropriate improvement plans and policy recommendations are presented accordingly.
First, it is a precedent for the designation of regional coexistence zones and autonomous commercial zones. As of November 2024, there is not a single area that has been designated as a regional coexistence zone and is protected by the Regional Commercial Zone Act. The fact that there are no areas designated as regional coexistence zones until two years have elapsed can be judged to be ineffective in the law. As a result, the Local Commercial Zone Act is ineffective and does not achieve its intended purpose of being the first law to protect small business owners such as landlords, tenants, and landowners. In addition, as of November 28, 2024, there are a total of 8 autonomous commercial zones formed to revitalize the relatively declining commercial area, and they are limited to Hamyang-gun in Gyeongsangnam-do, Gimcheon-si in Gyeongsangbuk-do, Gijang-gun in Busan Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Gangjin-gun in Jeollanam-do, Naju-si, and Yeongam-gun. Therefore, with the active participation and encouragement of the government and local governments, the designation of regional coexistence zones and autonomous commercial zones should be preceded.
Second, amendments should be made regarding the provisions that overlap with the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act. Currently, Article 11(1) of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act and Article 27 of the Local Commercial Zone Act are in effect redundantly. Since small business owners are subject to dual protection for commercial leases under the Regional Commercial Zone Act and the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act, it is necessary to analyze the effectiveness of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act first, and to make up for the deficiencies in the Regional Commercial Zone Act.
Third, studies should be conducted to predict areas where commercial gentrification is expected to occur. The report that analyzes the areas where commercial gentrification occurs and is expected to occur is the "Comprehensive Measures for Gentrification in Seoul in 2015", and there are no studies that predict and analyze areas that are expected to occur after 2015. Since preemptive response to commercial gentrification is the most important, it is necessary for the government to take active measures to protect the areas where it is expected to occur based on the results of analyzing and deriving how the patterns, patterns, and stages of occurrence appear in each region.
In its place, the entry of large-scale distributors and franchises that have become uniform disappears the unique characteristics of the commercial area, which in turn reduces the commercial area, negatively affecting all parties in the local community, such as landlords, tenants, and business operators.
As commercial gentrification in commercial spaces has reached a serious state across the country, the government feels the need to voluntarily participate in the voluntary participation of landlords and tenants in responding to commercial gentrification, revitalizing commercial areas, and protecting small businesses, as well as establishing a legal basis to protect local commercial rights.
Against this backdrop, the "Act on the Coexistence and Revitalization of Regional Commercial Areas (hereinafter referred to as the Regional Commercial Zone Act)" was enacted on July 27, 2021, and came into effect on April 28, 2022.
This course analyzes whether the Local Commercial Zone Act, which was enacted to respond to commercial gentrification, revitalize commercial rights, and protect small business owners, is effectively working in the field of life of small business owners.
As a method of judging effectiveness, post-hoc legislative impact analysis is used during legislative impact analysis, and appropriate improvement plans and policy recommendations are presented accordingly.
First, it is a precedent for the designation of regional coexistence zones and autonomous commercial zones. As of November 2024, there is not a single area that has been designated as a regional coexistence zone and is protected by the Regional Commercial Zone Act. The fact that there are no areas designated as regional coexistence zones until two years have elapsed can be judged to be ineffective in the law. As a result, the Local Commercial Zone Act is ineffective and does not achieve its intended purpose of being the first law to protect small business owners such as landlords, tenants, and landowners. In addition, as of November 28, 2024, there are a total of 8 autonomous commercial zones formed to revitalize the relatively declining commercial area, and they are limited to Hamyang-gun in Gyeongsangnam-do, Gimcheon-si in Gyeongsangbuk-do, Gijang-gun in Busan Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Gangjin-gun in Jeollanam-do, Naju-si, and Yeongam-gun. Therefore, with the active participation and encouragement of the government and local governments, the designation of regional coexistence zones and autonomous commercial zones should be preceded.
Second, amendments should be made regarding the provisions that overlap with the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act. Currently, Article 11(1) of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act and Article 27 of the Local Commercial Zone Act are in effect redundantly. Since small business owners are subject to dual protection for commercial leases under the Regional Commercial Zone Act and the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act, it is necessary to analyze the effectiveness of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act first, and to make up for the deficiencies in the Regional Commercial Zone Act.
Third, studies should be conducted to predict areas where commercial gentrification is expected to occur. The report that analyzes the areas where commercial gentrification occurs and is expected to occur is the "Comprehensive Measures for Gentrification in Seoul in 2015", and there are no studies that predict and analyze areas that are expected to occur after 2015. Since preemptive response to commercial gentrification is the most important, it is necessary for the government to take active measures to protect the areas where it is expected to occur based on the results of analyzing and deriving how the patterns, patterns, and stages of occurrence appear in each region.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 선행연구 검토
Ⅲ. 연구설계
Ⅳ. 「지역상권법」의 입법영향분석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
젠트리피케이션의 개선 정책에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2022 .02
-
젠트리피케이션 지역의 상가권리금 분쟁에 관한 연구
주거환경
2019 .03
-
서울시 상업지역의 기술적 효율성에 관한 연구
부동산경영
2017 .01
-
상업 젠트리피케이션에 따른 임차인 이동에 관한 연구
주거환경
2022 .12
-
구조방정식을 이용한 권역별 상업가로요인과 유동인구수가 상가매출액에 미치는 영향 분석
주택도시연구
2016 .12
-
상업 젠트리피케이션 발생지역에서 소유자 변화의 공간적 분포 - 인사동을 중심으로 -
주거환경
2020 .12
-
A Study on the Use of Empty Stores to Prevent Gentrification in Commercial Regeneration
유통과학연구
2019 .01
-
서울시 상업 젠트리피케이션 실태와 정책적 쟁점
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2016 .01
-
상가 업종 다양성에 따른 상권 변화 실증 분석
주거환경
2018 .07
-
지방 광역시 도시재생사업 상업 젠트리피케이션 특성에 관한 연구
도시재생
2023 .04
-
젠트리피케이션의 영역 설정 및 제도적 접근 방안에 관한 연구 : 상업적 젠트리피케이션을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2022 .02
-
Applying the tourist life cycle concept to the evolution of commercial areas using density, diversity, and land price
관광연구저널
2020 .04
-
상업 젠트리피케이션의 시공간 특성과 단계 분석 - 우리나라 7대 광역시의 주요 상업 재생지를 대상으로 -
대한지리학회지
2023 .08
-
A Study on the Appropriate Size of Stores and Countermeasures in Decline Commercial Area in the Original Downtown
유통과학연구
2021 .11
-
도시공간구조 특성에 따른 젠트리피케이션의 공간구문론적 해석-서울시 상업 젠트리피케이션 발생지역을 중심으로
도시정책연구
2021 .12
-
경기도 상권활성화 지원정책 개선방안 연구
정책연구
2022 .09
-
개별공시지가와 상업용 부동산 임대료 간의 상관관계 분석 -서울시를 중심으로
도시정책연구
2018 .01
-
코로나 팬데믹이 상가 매출과 임대료 부담에 미치는 영향
주거환경
2021 .09
-
프랜차이즈 빅데이터 상권정보시스템과 가맹점 경영성과와의 관계 연구 : 소상공인시장진흥공단 상권정보시스템을 중심으로
한국외식산업학회지
2019 .03
-
《中国商法通则》立法体系构建研究
원광법학
2018 .01
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
자산가 ‘투자1순위’ 꼬마빌딩 꿈틀 : 상권 분석 철저히…긴 호흡으로 접근해야
손동우
매경럭스맨
2025
.04
상권 활성화 도시재생사업의 주민 체감도 연구: 청주시 도시재생사업을 중심으로
김영균
,
조민경
,
황재훈
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2025
.02
[상권 분석] 11년 만에 차 다니는 연세로… 신촌·이대 상권 부활할까
황창희
한경MONEY
2025
.03
서울시 상권 매출에 주차공급이 미치는 영향 분석 -용산구 상권을 대상으로-
최홍근
,
윤진성
,
이승일
한국산학기술학회 논문지
2025
.01
[상권 분석] 사라지는 ‘강남의 밤’… 20대 주니 밤 매출도‘주춤’
황창희
한경MONEY
2025
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092472000